[Д♠] S. v. Johnstone: 5 x 'Crimen Injuria'

Frank Ellis: BBC's Reporting on White Farm Murders in South Africa & Zimbabwe

2009-12-05T03:20:00.000-08:00

What are we and they to understand as the connection between population and security? Population is a central element in nearly any concept of national security.
And in many regions the potential for conflict arising from simple overpopulation and starvation is large and growing. There is, of course, nothing simple about these problems; those who feel inclined to dismiss the seriousness of this potential should consider the question: "How does one say `Lebensraum' in Chinese?"
It should also be clear that solutions to the pressures created by population growth and movement, pressures that threaten the security of so many states, are beyond the means of any single state. Migration today can be controlled only by international agreement.
~ US Army War College: People Wars: Ruminations on Population and Security: How Does One Say 'Lebensraum' in Chinese? ~

BBC's Reporting on White Farm Murders in South Africa & Zimbabwe

Email from Dr. Ellis to BBC Radio 5

The following e-mail (excl. images) was sent by Dr Frank Ellis to Radio 5's Victoria Derbyshire in advance of her forthcoming visit to Zimbabwe and South Africa.

From: Frank Ellis
To: Victoria Derbyshire, BBC Radio 5
Date: 2nd December 2009
Re: Your visit to Zimbabwe and South Africa

I am contacting you in the hope that during your visits to Zimbabwe and South Africa you will confront head on with your black interlocutors (some of whom will be regime stooges) the racist and murderous behaviour of Mugabe’s regime and the tacit encouragement given by Zuma’s regime to black racist murderers in South Africa. There exists the very real danger – you work for the BBC after all – that you will refuse to tackle these questions since the organisation for which you work insists on presenting an anodyne, rainbow-coloured picture of South Africa to the rest of the world rather than the gruesome and savage reality that exists.

Some six years ago I met a farmer’s wife, Betty her name was, who had just been thrown out of Zimbabwe. Her crime consisted in the fact that her husband and she were successful, white farmers. Here is what happened. One day a gang of so-called “war veterans” (“war veterans” is the term used by Mugabe’s regime to describe the roving gangs who plunder white-owned farms and kill the owners) turned up at her farm. She was told that her husband and she would be thrown out of the country in one hour. Her husband died on the spot of a heart attack. Betty was only permitted to gather up enough personal effects sufficient to fill a small, hand-held suitcase. She was then taken to the airport and put on a plane. Betty and her husband had lived all their lives in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe. Not long after Betty related this harrowing account to me she died, broken-hearted and alone.

People’s War: New Light on the Struggle for South Africa, by Anthea Jeffery, author of The Truth About the Truth Commission (PDF:379K)

There is absolutely no doubt at all that Mugabe’s policy of dispossessing capable, productive white farmers and handing over the land and assets to incompetent blacks in the hope that blacks will simply continue what whites have created, nurtured and improved is the major cause of Zimbabwe’s miserable plight today. Indeed, inspired by Mugabe’s grotesque, Marxist policies of murder and mayhem, South Africa is already repeating the whole experiment and on a much bigger scale (see below). It is important that you and your masters understand these facts since Mugabe is solely responsible for turning a once thriving farming industry, with healthy surpluses for export, into a typical, Third-World basket case. No white person, man or woman, is responsible for this precipitate and dramatic decline. Mugabe and his fellow blacks confirm that when blacks are left to their own de(vices) regardless of any superior legacy bequeathed to them by the white man, the descent into murderousness and squalor is rapid and inevitable. Whites are not responsible for black failure. Nor do whites have any moral obligation whatsoever to make good the damage inflicted on Zimbabwe – disease, starvation, political violence and rampant inflation – by a deranged criminal and his peculiar brand of tribal, Marxist mumbo-jumbo.

If anything the situation is much worse in South Africa. The policies of the Marxist African National Congress (ANC) towards whites are racist, violent and entirely consistent with the way left-wing and communist regimes behave towards talented and competent minorities. Consider the fate of white farmers in South Africa. Since 1994, over 3,000 farmers and owners of small holdings have been murdered by black racist thugs. These murders frequently involve the most dreadful tortures being inflicted on the white victims before they die. Wives and daughters are raped in front of their men, tortured and then shot or hacked to pieces with machetes. The men are then tortured and eventually after the torturers have had enough are shot and left for dead. Babies, young children and the very old are not spared by these degenerates. In fact, the word “torture” cannot convey the unspeakable torments to which the victims - wives, women, girls, boys and fathers - were subjected before death released them. I have personally seen high definition digital images of white victims taken at the scene of crime by a Scenes of Crime Officer (SOCO). They are the most terrible images I have ever seen in my life. Nothing in my military service could ever have prepared me for what I saw.

Publicly, the ANC tries to play down these racist atrocities by claiming that violent crime affects everyone in South Africa, black and white. Up to a point this ANC claim is true but this claim hides, as it is intended to hide, the racial dimension of black-on-white crimes: the deliberate targeting of white farmers and others by black racists. Now, imagine the politically-correct, anti-racist fervour which would consume the BBC if some 3,000 black farmers had been robbed, tortured, raped, sodomised and executed by whites since 1994. One thing we can take for granted: FIFA would never have awarded the 2010 World Cup to South Africa.

In an interview with CNN over the weekend, Robert Mugabe stated once again, his support for the Final Solution and Extermination of White Farmers from Zimbabwe, as the ‘best thing to have happened to an African nation’. “Africa for the Africans”... » » » » » » » Only 70 miles from a 2010 World Cup football stadium, a farmer's wife and a boy aged 13 learn to defend themselves with lethal weapons... There are comparisons here with Zimbabwe and other calamitous reforms under the banner of “Africa for the Africans.” Special Investigation: The Secret Race War you won't read about in your World Cup brochure

I recently encountered white South Africans who maintain that whites in South Africa are the targets of genocide. Initially, I was sceptical. I have now changed my mind. There is no doubt that much of what is happening to whites in South Africa meets the criteria necessary to satisfy the definition of genocide: a group of people (whites) are the subject of deliberate violence which the government (ANC) either refuses to acknowledge or tacitly encourages (and does not prevent); whites are routinely denied employment and other opportunities so that low-IQ and poorly qualified blacks can be employed in place of whites; white culture (above all Boer) is denigrated, attacked and cultural artefacts are vandalised; the government media encourage a climate of hatred towards whites which makes it much easier for black racist killers to rob, to rape, to murder and to torture whites since they believe they have ANC approval. Here we can note a disturbing parallel with the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany. Long before the communists started to slaughter the peasants in the Soviet Union and the Nazis implemented the mass murder of Jews in Eastern Europe the state propaganda apparatus in both states targeted their respective “enemies of the people”. In the Soviet Union hard-working peasants were denounced as “parasites” and in Nazi Germany Jews as “agents of Zionism” plotting to stab Germany in the back. And what do we hear in South Africa: “One bullet, one settler”. The languages are not the same but the malevolent, genocidal spirit is identical.

Your visit to Zimbabwe and South Africa provides you with a unique opportunity to highlight what is happening to whites. It is high time that the BBC behaved in a way demanded by its charter. The BBC has an obligation to speak out honestly and openly, without fear or favour, and far as the fate of whites in Zimbabwe and South Africa is concerned it has so far failed to do so.

Source: Email
More Frank Ellis:

Nick Griffin on Question Time, BBC1
Time to Face the Truth about Multiculturalism
The teaching establishment is bad for our schoolchildren

Dr. Frank Ellis vs Victoria Derbyshire on the Logic of Multiculturalism

Farm Murders in South Africa

Carte Blanche Documentary, 2002

Nothing has changed for the better since then, to the contrary.
Note: NOT FOR SENSITIVE VIEWERS, CONTAIN GRAPHIC IMAGES.

Sounding an Alarm on Oil: In Search of a Presidential Energy Policy...

2009-11-20T17:01:00.001-08:00

If each human family were dependent only on its own resources; if the children of improvident parents starved to death; if thus, over breeding brought its own "punishment" to the germ line -- then there would be no public interest in controlling the breeding of families. But our society is deeply committed to the welfare state, and hence is confronted with another aspect of the tragedy of the commons.
In a welfare state, how shall we deal with the family, the religion, the race, or the class (or indeed any distinguishable and cohesive group) that adopts over breeding as a policy to secure its own aggrandizement? To couple the concept of freedom to breed with the belief that everyone born has an equal right to the commons is to lock the world into a tragic course of action.
~ Killing Times: The Killing Times are Here: Population Policy || Depopulation or Perish || Tragedy of the Commons ~

Michael Ruppert (FTW) Sounding an Alarm on Oil

Wall Street Journal

By Anthony Kaufman
04 November 2009

Michael Ruppert, at home with his friend, Rags, by Clara Tomkins.
Star of Collapse, Author of A Presidential Energy Policy, et al

Independent journalist Michael Ruppert predicted the global recession. Now he's foreseeing an imminent energy crisis

Michael Ruppert proudly claims that he predicted the global economic slump more than four years ago in his self-published "From the Wilderness," a monthly news publication and Web site. A narcotics investigator for the Los Angeles police department in the 1970s, Mr. Ruppert left the department and spent years trying to expose links between the CIA and drug smuggling; after 9/11, he wrote the 2004 bestseller "Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil," published by New Society Publishers and a favorite among conspiracy theorists.

Mr. Ruppert, 58 years old, has since moved on to what he believes are more pressing matters: oil and energy. ("I walked away from 9/11 five years ago," he says. "I have nothing to do with the 9/11 truth movement.") He has a new self-published book, "A Presidential Energy Policy: Twenty-five Points Addressing the Siamese Twins of Energy and Money," and a critically acclaimed new movie, "Collapse," in which he is the sole star and commentator.

Michael Ruppert, Collapse

Directed by documentarian Chris Smith ("American Movie"), the film consists mostly of Mr. Ruppert speaking about the dangers of peak oil and the looming catastrophe that declining oil reserves could bring. The film opens Nov. 6 in New York and on the new video-on-demand channel FilmBuff.

"The power of 'Collapse' is that Ruppert ... never sounds like a crackpot," Entertainment Weekly critic Owen Gleiberman wrote after the movie's Toronto International Film Festival premiere in September. "You may want to dispute him, but more than that you'll want to hear him, because what he says—right or wrong, prophecy or paranoia—takes up residence in your mind."

But as with "Fog of War," the Oscar-winning documentary about former Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara, Mr. Ruppert comes across in the film as both authoritative and dubious, leaving the audience open to make its own judgment of the man and his ideas. The Wall Street Journal sat down with Mr. Ruppert to discuss oil, Wall Street and the "imminent collapse of human industrialized civilization."

The Wall Street Journal: What is the central message of your movie?

Mr. Ruppert: It is not possible to continue infinite consumption and infinite population growth on a finite planet.

WSJ: So what do you believe needs to be done first?

Mr. Ruppert: Two things are critically important: A real worldwide transparent effort to determine how much oil is really left. Screw state secrets. I don't care what the Saudis, Russians, BP or Chavez want to hide. We have to clean up those books just exactly as the same way that we need to clean up the books on Wall Street. Secondly, we need to establish a second strategic petroleum reserve of refined product for state, county and municipal use because I really foresee a serious oil shock coming as soon as this ersatz recovery starts to push up the global GDP and demand for electricity. We have to make sure we have basic services.

WSJ: In no uncertain terms, you discount all alternative fuel options in the film, calling clean coal a contradiction and ethanol a "joke." How can you be so sure?

Mr. Ruppert: With 800 million internal combustion-powered vehicles on the planet and the fact that oil powers 90% of transportation, there is nothing that replaces what oil does. And transportation, of course, is what makes everything work, from shipping products to shipping people. And you cannot plug any alternative technologies into a 2008 GMC SUV or a 747 airplane. One of the things that I've also stressed is how much energy goes into making products: There's seven gallons of oil in every tire, and all plastics, paints and resins are made from oil.

WSJ: Do you think there's a greater chance of things turning around under the Obama administration?

Mr. Ruppert: No, it's not a matter of political party. It's a matter of energy. And money is useless without energy and money has no respect for power or ideology. We have to reconnect with the requirements that we're living on a planet that's falling apart. And we have to maintain some relationship that's separate from the illusory power of money. Clearly, the power in this country is not in Washington, it's in New York, with the Fed and with Wall Street.

WSJ: How do you see Wall Street playing a role?

Mr. Ruppert: Until you change the way money works, you change nothing. The current economic paradigm calls for infinite growth, from fractional reserve banking to compact interest. So Wall Street needs to somehow help us find an economy that works without requiring more and more consumption.

Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of The American Empire at The End of The Age of Oil, by Michael Ruppert

WSJ: You've been called "a purveyor of amazing tales" as well as a crusading investigative journalist. What's your response?

Mr. Ruppert: I have two responses: One is that I don't matter. You can focus on me or not, or you can focus on the likely imminent collapse of human industrialized civilization, and I think that's the more important story. On the other hand, I have been severely mistreated. I have been tied up with legal attacks for five to six years and there's only so many I can take on at a time. So I can take away time from reporting and spend time protecting my reputation. And I just made the tactical decision that getting the message out was more important.

WSJ: There's a great irony revealed in the film where we learn about your own economic collapse. Are you still behind in your rent?

Mr. Ruppert: Yes. But people are stepping up to help. We raised $17,000-$18,000 for the legal defense fund for this absolutely crazy ruling in Oregon. [Orgeon's Bureau of Labor and Industries has ordered Mr. Ruppert to pay damages for an incident of workplace sexual harassment.] So I have a lot of support out there. I'll just do whatever I have to do.

Source: Wall Street Journal
Mike Ruppert Documentaries: Denial Stops Here ** Truth & Lies of 9/11 ** Collapse
From the Wilderness: Archives :: Blog

Amazon Purchase: Presidential Energy Policy :: Crossing the Rubicon :: Denial Stops Here :: Truth & Lies of 911

Review of A Presidential Energy Policy, by Michael Ruppert, by Carolyn Baker

Energy Bulletin

Energy Bulletin
May 3, 2009

A Presidential Energy Policy by Michael Ruppert

American culture and consumption has become Public Enemy Number One in the global growth paradigm. People are realizing that the American Dream is murder....Unless a fundamental change is made-and quickly-the only available option is collapse and implosion; the bursting of the human population bubble; or, as people in the Peak Oil movement call it-the Dieoff. The sole purpose of this book (and my life) is to prevent that, or as much of that death and misery, as is humanly possible.
~ Michael C. Ruppert~

This is probably the most important book review I've ever written because A Presidential Energy Policy is unquestionably the most crucial book for anyone aware of the collapse of civilization, which is well underway, to read and understand. It is second only to Mike's first masterpiece, Crossing The Rubicon: The Decline of The American Empire at The End of The Age of Oil (2004).

I could have said, "Ruppert's first masterpiece", but Mike is my friend, yet that does not in any way deter my objectivity when assessing the inestimable value of what this book offers the world.

I do have a small quibble with one concept near the book's end on which I will comment later, but first, we need to acknowledge what Mike establishes in the first pages: "...oil price spikes in June and July of 2008 broke the backs of over-extended consumers who could no longer meet their (sub-prime) mortgage payments and that this-and this alone-triggered the great economic crash which began in September and October. Energy and money are inextricably connected in very profound ways...." Furthermore he notes, "The current economic implosion will and can only result in the greatest-and longest lasting-economic depression in human history-a new Dark Age, especially if some fundamental sea changes are not made immediately."

LEADERSHIP

Is gross mismanagement of the nation's energy policy an impeachable offense? 18July2006 :: PeakOilRSA :: BriefingPaper

In the first chapter, the connection between money and energy is solidly established, but more importantly, the need for leadership and the reality that the plan to deal with the problem has been kept secret from us largely, as Mike documented in Crossing The Rubicon, by the National Energy Policy Development Group of 2001, chaired by Dick Cheney. Presumably, one of the first steps in providing leadership to address the inevitable catastrophic consequences of Peak Oil would be to uncover the truth about oil supply and what contingency plans were formulated by Cheney's group.

Mike asserts that his status as a non-partisan expert on energy depletion with lifelong experience with government, frees him from having to "play nice" with political groups and parties. Consequently, the contents of this book and his expertise offer the leadership desperately needed to authentically address the crisis. Fundamental to doing so, he says, is the need to abandon arguments about offshore drilling and face head-on the reality that the current economic crisis "is a global economic meltdown. No nation gets out unscathed. Nothing can grow forever."

Not willing to ever consider himself a candidate for any elected office, Mike states unequivocally that A Presidential Energy Policy has been written for Barack Obama and will be successful even if it does nothing more than open the door to genuine dialog on energy and money; "one cannot be discussed without the other."

Nor does this book adhere to the agenda of any political party. As with nearly all of Mike's writing over the years, some parts are resoundingly liberal and resemble FDR's New Deal, and some parts echo a conservative Republican or Libertarian approach simply because Mike's overarching concern has always been to "implement policies that will keep the nation functioning and that will protect the American people and the world as a whole." Having said this, he asserts that no president can protect corporations and banks with taxpayer money and at the same time allow the nation and its working and middle class citizens to fail. Unfortunately, that is currently what Barack Obama, despite political rhetoric to the contrary, appears to be doing.

POPULATION

Today, 6.5 billion humans depend entirely on oil for food, energy, plastics & chemicals. Population growth is on a collision course with the inevitable decline in oil production.
Oil Factor: Behind the War on Terror

Concluding Chapter One is the familiar hockey stick diagram depicting population growth which of course correlates exactly with the dawn of the age of oil. While the reader may be tempted to overlook this important diagram, Mike returns to the population issue later in the book, and no reader should take the correlation lightly. The fact remains that human population has grown to its present level precisely because of cheap and abundant petroleum, and when that form of energy is no longer available to our species, the consequences in terms of how many of our numbers endure is obvious-a reality reiterated many times in A Presidential Energy Policy. It is therefore crucial that human beings begin to openly and honestly discuss the issue of population and commit to reducing it through means that are as humane as possible lest through our resistance to doing so, nature takes the matter into its hands and reduces population in ways that are horrific and unimaginable.

In this book Mike is thinking like a president and asks the reader to do the same. He also asks us to abandon all of the hype about alternative energies, green technology, and magic bullet solutions to the realities of Peak Oil and boldly confront the fact that "It is not possible to use enormous amounts of resources to address a resource shortage." While Obama and subsequent presidents will be faced with unprecedented energy crises, Mike reminds us that this is not just an American crisis and that the ramifications of burgeoning population growth alongside a decline in cheap fossil fuel energy spells nothing but doom for the human race unless it begins immediately to intelligently and humanely navigate what Mike calls two sides of a giant claw tightening its grip around all of us.

Therefore, the energy policy of the United States cannot be created in a vacuum. All countries, not just our own, depend on petroleum from other countries, and any president must thoughtfully ponder this fact and detach from wishful thinking about so-called energy breakthroughs, especially since the United States represents 5% of the world's population but uses 25% of its energy. He or she must also understand that oil depletion is happening far too rapidly to naively believe that switching to some attractive alternative is even possible.

SIAMESE TWINS, CHICKENS, AND EGGS

Truth & Lies of 9/11, by Michael Ruppert

In this book Mike is thinking like a president and asks the reader to do the same. He also asks us to abandon all of the hype about alternative energies, green technology, and magic bullet solutions to the realities of Peak Oil and boldly confront the fact that "It is not possible to use enormous amounts of resources to address a resource shortage."

In the "End of Suburbia", Richard Heinberg states unambiguously that Peak Oil will bring about a recession that never ends. In A Presidential Energy Policy, Mike Ruppert points out that:
All the new money being printed out of thin air is going to service a $700 trillion derivatives bubble to keep banks and lending institutions afloat. All that money is doing is enabling the financials to try and make their minimum monthly payments on a credit bubble they created.

In numerous places, including "The End of Suburbia", Mike has reminded us that the books on oil have been as cooked as the books on Enron, but it is now time for every country to know with certainty how much oil it has left. A key player in the ongoing mystery of how much oil remains on earth has been Saudi Arabia, and there is abundant evidence that that nation's oil supply has peaked, thanks to the brilliant research of Matt Simons, chairman of the world's largest energy investment bank and author of Twilight In The Desert: The Coming Saudi Oil Shock and The World Economy.

But not only must a president know how much oil his/her country has, that chief executive must carefully assess the limitations and disrepair of America's energy grid. While much of the nation's infrastructure has been and is being privatized, this does not mean that grid efficiency can be achieved within the next few decades, especially when skyrocketing energy prices will exclude many citizens from being able to afford the delivery of that energy at all. For as Mike notes, "A spike, even back to $3 a gallon will cause more hardship in 2009 than $4 gasoline did in 2008." Additionally, when assessing infrastructure, a president must include the costs of asphalt (highly petroleum intensive) and the loss of land which is very likely going to be needed for growing food. When infrastructure isn't rebuilt because of "lack of money or materiel, civilization starts to break down."

GEOPOLITICS, FOOD, CLIMATE CHANGE

Lest the reader infer that A Presidential Energy Policy deals only with domestic energy issues, Mike has included a chapter on Iraq and on Saudi Arabia, a separate chapter on foreign policy, and numerous articles by Mike regarding energy and geopolitics written in recent years are archived at the From The Wilderness website. In fact, he may know more about pipelines throughout the world and the geopolitical implications of them than anyone.

I must also mention that for me, no discussion of the collapse of industrial civilization, energy depletion, or economic meltdown can be complete without a discussion of climate change. In this book, Mike integrates the relevance of climate change in both his consideration of Peak Oil and the current economic depression. In this way, he offers a holistic assessment of what I have been calling for years the Toxic Triangle of collapse and what others have been labeling the "Triple Crisis": energy, economics, and the environment.

Eating Fossil Fuels, by Dale Allen Pfeiffer

And on the topic of environment, Mike says that "if there is anything that must be understood with regard to energy it is its relationship to food." Additionally, "If there is any issue which will reveal whether an American president is serving corporations or the people, it is food." Included in his chapter on food, are articles on the use of ethanol as an energy source, as well as one of the most important articles ever published by From The Wilderness, "Eating Fossil Fuels", by Dale Allen Pfeiffer. Connecting the disastrous use of ethanol with population dieoff, Pfeiffer presents us with three choices regarding population, that is: Facing and acting on our dilemma and consciously, voluntarily limiting population growth; allowing the government to regulate population growth; or allowing nature to perform unspeakable acts of suffering and death.

Having adamantly warned us for years not to be seduced by promises of alternative energies which they are incapable of delivering, Mike reiterates his cautionary assessment of them. As he has stated many times,"...there is no alternative energy or combination of alternative energies, that will permit current consumption and lifestyle to continue-let alone provide for the compound growth we are wedded to in the current economic paradigm." The supreme reality of Peak Oil is that we will be downsized, whether we intend to be or not. To deny this fact is tantamount to assuming that Disneyworld can be run on a handful of flashlight batteries.

But Mike doesn't present these facts without also clarifying specific criteria for choosing energy options. Carefully contemplating them is beyond sobering; in fact, it is chilling, especially when one considers the touting of so-called solutions like shale and the electric car-both large consumers of water, which like every other resource on earth has also dramatically peaked. Should anyone doubt this, I suggest the films "Thirst" and "Flow" which unequivocally document the decline of water worldwide. The last thing our species and the earth community needs is another form of energy usage that further depletes any of myriad disappearing resources on this planet.

LOCALIZATION

The Power of Community: How Cuba Survived Peak Oil, by Community Solution

If the rest of A Presidential Energy Policy were not so incredibly juicy, Mike's laundry list of so-called energy alternatives alone, and his analysis of them would be worth the read. But he doesn't leave us there because he takes us into what I believe is the absolute crux of the book, namely, localization as "the alternative to the alternatives." As I write that, I'm reminded of some local farmer friends of mine who are off the grid raising three children and who do all their farming with draft animals. They're fond of pointing out that what we have become accustomed to calling "alternative energy", namely solar and wind, is the only tangible energy there is and that all other forms are, in fact, alternative. They do not, however, proclaim solar and wind to be the magic bullets that many others do. What they do proclaim and live, is the localization of all resource options.

In the Localization chapter, Mike advises the president to understand that:
...your first awareness is that the federal government cannot and will not take on the role of solving problems in cities and townships. That would be inefficient and inappropriate on every conceivable level. Only the people in each locality know and can decide what they need most. Each location has different needs. Your second awareness is that if localities fail at the bottom, the nation will fail at the top.

The Pharaohs of ancient Egypt were amongst the first people to recognise the importance of the Soldiers of the Soil. In fact Cleopatra declared the earthworm sacred, and anyone trying to take them out of the country was subjected to the death penalty. Tests carried out in the Nile valley by the US Department of Agriculture in 1949 proved that the great fertility of the soil there was due largely to the work of earthworms.~ SQ Worm Sosiety

Moreover, says Mike, all local responses to a tightening of oil supply will be dictated by the degree of self-sufficiency to which each community has liberated itself from dependence on anything from outside. Dear reader, please take the time to read that sentence again. The implications of this are jaw-dropping-and-absolutely necessary for us to wrap our minds around and implement, now. One implication is that globalization is dead. How well I remember Mike's statement in "End of Suburbia" that Peak Oil would absolutely reverse globalization. So hello human race, here we are with those giant parking lot gluts of cars all over the Los Angeles area, not to mention the Port of Long Beach, that no one will buy. For the same reason, when I enter a J.C. Penny's store, the walls and doors are covered with "70% Off" signs. Globalization, R.I.P.

As Mike points out, many individuals and families have relocated to areas where they can make themselves less dependent on fossil fuels and the goods and services of civilization. What is also true is that while we have organizations like Community Solutions and the Transition Town movement with which I am deeply involved in my community, those endeavors are still largely educational and have not been fully implemented. One stellar exception to this is Willits, California which has had a head start on localization for some time.

However, Mike adds a caveat with which I could not agree more, namely, that "There is no hope for any of us outside of a community." Here, it is important to broaden our definition of community because it does not necessarily mean a living community but rather, a group of folks in our local venues who are collapse-aware, who are working to gain self-sufficiency, and to do what is necessary to support each other in the face of collapse.

Hence, at this point I must raise the only quibble I have with A Presidential Energy Policy. In this must-read articulation of everything a president, and a nation's citizens must understand about energy, Mike has left us with what I consider a scenario that is less than feasible:
Whether as a result of the collapse of industrial civilization, the total insolvency of the United States government, the economic crash that is just beginning, or climate change (or all of the above), the effects on the United States government are going to be profound. Services are going to be cut. Bureaucracies are going to remain that may not be needed any longer, while some that may be desperately needed will not exist. At some point it will become necessary to put everything on the table and reorganize the government entirely. The imperative first-place-to-begin is the Executive Branch, which should be created anew from a blank sheet of paper.

In a subsequent paragraph, Mike states we may need to design and build a new Executive Branch of government that reflects the new paradigm being born and that for this, we will need new Jeffersons and Madisons-new founding fathers and mothers. While I do not rule out the possibility of this eventuality, I certainly do not believe it is probable. The very sea change that Mike has been brilliantly describing throughout the book dictates that we are now and will be in the days ahead, traversing territory that is absolutely unprecedented in modern history. For example, if we holistically consider the Triple Crisis, Toxic Triangle, or whatever we choose to call it-energy depletion, economic meltdown, and global climate change, then we must consider that any or all of those could radically alter not only the existence of a federal government but the very geography of the continent itself.

Last year I relocated from the Southwestern United States to Vermont. My reasons for doing so are legion, and I discussed some of them in my June, 2008 article "Location, Location, Re-location." Famous for its intense winters and high unemployment even in good times, Vermont is not for the faint of heart, and I do not recommend it unless one has job security and the ability to navigate a treacherous winter.

That said, one attraction to this sparsely populated state with its abundance of water and arable land is that it has always been a bastion of independent thinking and has today one of the strongest movements for secession in the nation. No, I'm not referring to some Rick Perry quip like "Texas might secede", but rather I'm referring to a group of thoughtful individuals who have been observing and preparing for collapse for several years. I happen to serve on the editorial board of their outstanding newspaper, Vermont Commons, the only statewide independent newspaper in Vermont.

Truth & Justice!; or Secession? for the Cape Republic of Good Hope

While I am not personally a rabid secessionist, I have come to believe that preparation for the radical alteration of geography as a result of the Triple Crisis is essential for everyone who wishes to be self-sufficient. In this state, as in I would imagine all others, there are pockets which might be completely cut off from other areas as a result of natural disasters or collapsed bridges or other infrastructure which cannot be repaired-eventualities to which Mike referred in his wonderful book. I believe that not only is such fragmentation likely, but that those disconnections might become so severe that a federal government would become completely irrelevant to and out of reach for the citizens in those areas who might be cut off from the rest of the state and nation by circumstances which we cannot now fully imagine. In other words, "secession" may not the only means by which a community becomes radically self-sufficient. In my opinion, therefore, it behooves us, if we are truly committed to localization, to focus our energies accordingly, rather than on the remapping of the Executive Branch of the federal government. It is also entirely possible that no either/or will occur and that both scenarios will deserve our attention.

Revisiting The Limits to Growth, by Mathew Simmons

What Mike has emphasized repeatedly throughout the book is an urgent transformation of our thinking-a mentality that has left miles of unsold new cars sitting in lots all over Los Angeles-cars with seven gallons of oil in each tire. Only a profound soul sickness could create and maintain a civilization that is destroying everything in its path with little thought to the suicidal trajectory into which it has become locked.

I ask you to read A Presidential Energy Policy as soon as possible and share it with your friends and family. Share it with your elected officials and your neighbors and begin now to educate your community in preparation for the inevitable consequences of the Triple Crisis. Unquestionably, we are entering a new Dark Age, but the information Mike has offered, if heeded, could punctuate the darkness with a thousand points of light.

Richard Heinberg comments that "This book, recently reviewed at length by Carolyn Baker, describes the essence of our global energy predicament for a mass audience. Ruppert ties together the issues of oil depletion, resource geopolitics, population, climate, world currency/banking systems, and global food supplies, showing how perilous our current path is, and what we need to do to change direction. Short, readable, and clear, this is an ideal book to give to friends, relatives, or political representatives who don’t yet “get it.”"

Carolyn Baker, Ph.D., manages Truth to Power at http://www.carolynbaker.net/ and is the author of the just-published Sacred Demise: Walking The Spiritual Path of Industrial Civilization's Collapse. She is an adjunct professor of history and psychology and is the author of U.S. History Uncensored: What Your High School Textbook Didn't Tell You, (2006), endorsed by Mike Ruppert. Carolyn is also a former writer for and Managing Editor of From The Wilderness.

Source: Energy Bulletin
Mike Ruppert Documentaries: Denial Stops Here ** Truth & Lies of 9/11 ** Collapse
From the Wilderness: Archives :: Blog

Amazon Purchase: Presidential Energy Policy :: Crossing the Rubicon :: Denial Stops Here :: Truth & Lies of 911

Société Générale tells clients how to prepare for potential 'global collapse'

2009-11-20T13:19:00.000-08:00

“Today, people are beginning to understand that the government's account is overdrawn, that a piece of paper is not the equivalent of a gold coin, or an automobile, or a loaf of bread—and that if you attempt to falsify monetary values, you do not achieve abundance, you merely debase the currency and go bankrupt.” —Ayn Rand, ‘Moral Inflation’
For the uninitiated, the moral of the story is simply this: Politicians invariably respond to crises -- that in most cases they themselves created -- by spawning new government programs, laws and regulations. These, in turn, generate more havoc and poverty, which inspires the politicians to create more programs . . . and the downward spiral repeats itself until the productive sectors of the economy collapse under the collective weight of taxes and other burdens imposed in the name of fairness, equality and do-goodism.
~ American capitalism whimpers || 'Atlas Shrugged': From Fiction to Fact in 52 Years || Objectivism: Bridging Liberal Conservative Environment Divide ~

Société Générale tells clients how to prepare for potential 'global collapse'

Telegraph UK

By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
Published: 6:12PM GMT 18 Nov 2009

Explosion of debt: Japan's public debt could reach as much as 270pc of GDP in the next two years. A bullet train is pictured speeding past Mount Fuji in Fuji city, west of Tokyo Photo: Reuters

Société Générale has advised clients to be ready for a possible "global economic collapse" over the next two years, mapping a strategy of defensive investments to avoid wealth destruction.

In a report entitled "Worst-case debt scenario", the bank's asset team said state rescue packages over the last year have merely transferred private liabilities onto sagging sovereign shoulders, creating a fresh set of problems.

Overall debt is still far too high in almost all rich economies as a share of GDP (350pc in the US), whether public or private. It must be reduced by the hard slog of "deleveraging", for years.

"As yet, nobody can say with any certainty whether we have in fact escaped the prospect of a global economic collapse," said the 68-page report, headed by asset chief Daniel Fermon. It is an exploration of the dangers, not a forecast.

Under the French bank's "Bear Case" scenario (the gloomiest of three possible outcomes), the dollar would slide further and global equities would retest the March lows. Property prices would tumble again. Oil would fall back to $50 in 2010.

Governments have already shot their fiscal bolts. Even without fresh spending, public debt would explode within two years to 105pc of GDP in the UK, 125pc in the US and the eurozone, and 270pc in Japan. Worldwide state debt would reach $45 trillion, up two-and-a-half times in a decade.

(UK figures look low because debt started from a low base. Mr Ferman said the UK would converge with Europe at 130pc of GDP by 2015 under the bear case).

The underlying debt burden is greater than it was after the Second World War, when nominal levels looked similar. Ageing populations will make it harder to erode debt through growth. "High public debt looks entirely unsustainable in the long run. We have almost reached a point of no return for government debt," it said.

What is the Mandrake Mechanism?: It's the most important financial lesson of your life!! ... It is the method by which the Federal Reserve creates money out of nothing; the concept of usury as the payment of interest on pretended loans; the true cause of the hidden tax called inflation; the way in which the Fed creates boom-bust cycles. The Creature from Jekyll Island: The Federal Reserve Bank, by Edward Griffin

Inflating debt away might be seen by some governments as a lesser of evils.

If so, gold would go "up, and up, and up" as the only safe haven from fiat paper money. Private debt is also crippling. Even if the US savings rate stabilises at 7pc, and all of it is used to pay down debt, it will still take nine years for households to reduce debt/income ratios to the safe levels of the 1980s.

The bank said the current crisis displays "compelling similarities" with Japan during its Lost Decade (or two), with a big difference: Japan was able to stay afloat by exporting into a robust global economy and by letting the yen fall. It is not possible for half the world to pursue this strategy at the same time.

SocGen advises bears to sell the dollar and to "short" cyclical equities such as technology, auto, and travel to avoid being caught in the "inherent deflationary spiral". Emerging markets would not be spared. Paradoxically, they are more leveraged to the US growth than Wall Street itself. Farm commodities would hold up well, led by sugar.

Mr Fermon said junk bonds would lose 31pc of their value in 2010 alone. However, sovereign bonds would "generate turbo-charged returns" mimicking the secular slide in yields seen in Japan as the slump ground on. At one point Japan's 10-year yield dropped to 0.40pc. The Fed would hold down yields by purchasing more bonds. The European Central Bank would do less, for political reasons.

SocGen's case for buying sovereign bonds is controversial. A number of funds doubt whether the Japan scenario will be repeated, not least because Tokyo itself may be on the cusp of a debt compound crisis.

Mr Fermon said his report had electrified clients on both sides of the Atlantic. "Everybody wants to know what the impact will be. A lot of hedge funds and bankers are worried," he said.

Source: Telegraph UK

[Update 16-11-07] Notice of (i) Correction of Error/s & (ii) Retraction of Enclosure; re: Encl.Your Life is In Danger (www.zasucks.com/?p=6151)

2009-11-09T13:01:00.000-08:00

Today, 6.5 billion humans depend entirely on oil for food, energy, plastics & chemicals. Population growth is on a collision course with the inevitable decline in oil production.
To advocate for human rights, peace, and social justice while ignoring their necessary ecological basis --— a stable human population – at, or slightly less than – the eco-systems long term carrying capacity --- is intellectual dishonesty and hypocrisy.
The longer we put off choosing the nicer methods of achieving demographic stability, the more likely the nasty ones become, whether imposed by nature or by some fascistic regime. Urine Good Company might represent a mild version of what could actually be in store if we let the marketplace, corporations, and secretive, militaristic governments come up with eugenic solutions to our population dilemma.
~ Population, Resources, and Human Idealism, Energy Bulletin | Population Growth: Most Powerful Force on Earth, Money&Markets ~

Cape Bar & Intn'l Bar Assoc: Pro Bono Comm's: RE: Freedom of Speech Political and Cultural Rights, or Secession?; Constitutional, & Intn'l Law Issues

Notice of (i) Correction of Error/s & (ii) Retraction of Enclosure; re: Encl.Your Life is In Danger (www.zasucks.com/?p=6151)

Update 09 Nov '09: Corrections are as follows:

Letter: Notice of (i) Correction of Errors & (ii) Retraction of Enclosure; re: Encl. Your Life is In Danger (www.zasucks.com/?p=6151)
Enclosure: Annexure AA: Transparency Disclosure: Email Correspondence: Lara Johnstone to & from: SA Sucks: Doodler & Lone Wolf. Dates: Friday Oct 30, to Nov 5, 2009

Letter to SA Students Congress, Mandela Rhodes Foundation, ANC Youth League; RE: Reitz 4 & Black Culture...
» 09-11-07 Correction: PDF:49K » Encl.AA PDF:2603K
» » Sent: Sat 11/7/2009 11:18 PM
» » Honey Attorneys: Read: Mon 11/9/2009 4:16 PM

Letter to Irish Embassy, Jefferson Family & Independent Newspapers; RE: Boycott 2010 World Cup
» 09-11-07 Correction: PDF:49K » Encl.AA PDF:2603K
» » Sent: Sat 11/7/2009 10:00 PM
» » Owen Swaine Solicitors: Read: Sun 11/8/2009 6:31 PM

Letter to Austrian Embassy, Burgstaller & Symcox Families; RE: Boycott 2010 World Cup
» 09-11-07 Correction: PDF:49K » Encl.AA PDF:2603K
» » Sent: Sat 11/7/2009 9:36 PM
» » Austrian Embassy, Pta: Read: Mon 11/9/2009 8:48 AM

Boycott 2010 World Cup!: Truth & Justice; or Secession?
» 09-11-07 Correction: PDF:49K » Encl.AA PDF:2603K

PC Canada vs. IRB & Huntley: How many SA Black on White Crimes are Racially Motivated?
» 09-11-07 Correction: PDF:49K » Encl.AA PDF:2603K
» » Sent: Tue 11/10/2009 12:34 AM
» » SA HC in Canada: Read on 11/9/2009 8:32 AM
» » Min. Citizenship & Immig, Canada: Read: Mon 11/9/2009 2:31 PM
» » High. Comm. of Canada, Pta: Read: Sat 11/7/2009 11:14 PM

Cape Bar & Intn'l Bar Assoc: Pro Bono Comm's: RE: Freedom of Speech Political and Cultural Rights, or Secession?; Constitutional, & Intn'l Law Issues
» 09-11-07 Correction: PDF:55K » Encl.AA PDF:2603K
» » Sent: Mon 11/9/2009 2:26 PM
» » Cape Bar Assoc.: Read: Mon 11/9/2009 2:31 PM
» » Intn'l Bar Assoc.: Read: Mon 11/9/2009 2:27 PM
Your message
To: OTP InformationDesk; JAGCMC@navy.mil;
Cc: www.miragestorum.co.nr
Subject: RE: [Update] ICC Prosecutor: Info & Evidence Unit (CC: Dep. Judge Adv. Gen., US Navy JAG Office)
Sent: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:27:54 +0100
was read on Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:29:45 +0100
My apologies for the inconvenience and the error.

Update: 10 November '09:

ILuvSA Retractions & Corrections: Vanilla Ice: Black Swans, Misrepresentations and the Truth

Update: 16 November '09:

Ontmaskering:: ZA Sucks # 6151: Image Provocateurs?: The Context » » The Evidence
Brief Forensic Investigation Conclusion: Four of the 13 alleged 'South African crime scene photographs' posted by Uhuru Guru/Lone Wolf, to Doodler's SA Sucks post, Your Life is In Danger (#6151), are unequivocally and undoubtedly not South African crime scene photographs, from South African police files. Furthermore, three of the alleged 'crime scene' photographs, are used online by individuals pornography preferences include crime scene corpses. As a result of the distastefullness of the evidence to these allegations: The forensic evidence is only available in full on the password protected pages of the ontmaskering blog, for evidentiary purposes, in proving the allegations only.

Dear Sirs & Ladies,

Apologies for the inconvenience; but I do not intentionally distribute incorrect information. If or when I am informed with evidence that I have made an error, then my religious cultural principles of Radical Hon(our)sty , require that I take personal responsibility for my error, and correct it. This is such a case.

In aforementioned letter to you, I included a copy of the original article, from SA Sucks (www.zasucks.com): Your Life is In Danger (www.zasucks.com/?p=6151) (PDF[7]), as an enclosure/link. At the time of sharing the information with you, I fully believed, according to my efforts to confirm the information, that the information in said article was authentic and honest information shared from its authors, Doodler and Lone Wolf, of SA Sucks.

Brief Chronology of Events:

The aforementioned article including its gruesome and horrific crime scene photographs, was posted to the aforementioned SA Sucks website, by ‘Doobler’ (Article and 1 photo) and ‘Lone Wolf’ (Photo Gallery of 13 photos), on October 27th.

On Oct 30th, I contacted Lone Wolf by email, to make further enquiries regarding the crime scene photos, so as to ascertain their authenticity, and other evidence he stated he had, for submission to the International Criminal Court: Office of the Prosecutor: Information and Evidence Unit. I had submitted other – unrelated to SASucks -- South African White Refugee, and related material to the ICC; and thought the crime scene photos significant important additional evidence. His response convinced me he was genuinely concerned, and I concluded he was telling the truth about the photos: Should the ICC investigate, he would provide the ICC with the information as to his sources; and the matter could be professionally and impartially investigated.

On 04 November 2009, I was informed the ‘owner’ of the SASucks blog, ‘Uhuru Guru’ was arrested, by a Capt. van der Linde (Linden Police Station, Jhb), without any charges being filed. He was subsequently held overnight in police cells, and subsequently released the following day, when the State Prosecutor refused to lay charges, on the old crimen injuria matter, from 1993.

The initial news of the arrest shocked the blogging community, many -– like myself -- who mobilized to spread the word, about his arrest, far and wide. The arrests occurring so soon after SA Sucks crime scene photograph ‘expose’, I very strongly suspected the possibility that the arrests were directly linked, and the arrests appeared to be attempts to intimidate SA Sucks, to cease exposing ‘South African crime’ evidence which the S. A. government and police were hiding and covering up.

On 06 Nov, I was informed of a post at Litnet, (And so the Boston Stranglers victims end up on SASucks), which alleged the aforementioned South African crime scene photographs to be frauds. Unfortunately, a Google search for Boston Strangler crime scene photographs, yields the exact picture[10**] found on aforementioned original SASucks site; although the Boston Crime Scene site comments allege other crime scene realities. Irrespective of which crime scene the photo was originally from, it clearly is not as inferred and represented in the original SA Sucks article; casting serious doubt on the other photos, in the same article, as originally stated. [** See 16 Nov '09 Update.]

In compiling a transcript of the email correspondence between myself and Lone Wolf et al, on this matter, for transparency disclosure purposes; a further very strange ‘Red Flag’ occurred:
There is one email missing from my Microsoft Email Account Sent box, and I am pretty sure I sent it to Lone Wolf and [Name Withheld], sometime around Nov 3, or 4. The only other time any email has ever disappeared from my computer, that I am aware of, was an email written in May 2001, to President G.W. Bush; CC: FBI, CIA et al; requesting the suspension of Timothy McVeigh’s execution, for McVeigh and the victims of the OKC bombing to get closure, via Radical Honesty Truth and Forgiveness.

This missing email was a copy of the Molotov Cocktail, March ‘07 article: Paramilitary Training Camps in South Africa [http://whatisyourrrintelligence.blogspot.com/2009/11/paramilitary-training-camps-in-south.html], with the Cryptome PDF attachment of the alleged 2001 NIA Briefing of Pres. Thabo Mbeki, regarding alleged Hamas Paramilitary Training Camps in South Africa. I did not delete the email; and if intentionally removed by any individual, then I consider it a plausibility the removal of the email, from my computer, is yet another Plausible Deniable Crypto Message from the NSA, whom I granted permission to monitor all my written, telephonic et al communications on 28 October 2001[11].

Cryptome PDF Original at: http://cryptome.org/za-hamas.htm
Copy: https://docs.google.com/fileview?id=0B4TzWFmSUmx9ODAwZTBiMGItMTQyOC00M2ZmLWJjMmItYmE2MmJmZTM2MjBj&hl=en

Note: The Military Intelligence Agencies who were contacted (CC’d to my ICC complaint) about these Population Policy Common Sense: ‘White Refugee’ and ‘Assymetrical Resource Warfare’ matters, are listed among others, at www.miragestorum.co.nr

I accordingly include as an attachment hereto, the full Transparency Disclosure transcript of all email correspondence between myself and Lone Wolf, et al, in this matter.

Conclusion, Retraction and Apology

The arguments[12] and evidence I have submitted previously and elsewhere for the claims I have made, in regard to crime and racially motivated acts of crime in South Africa, based upon the evidence stated therein, remain. I still think the South African government are not being remotely transparent and have, and continue to, violate the Social Contract; as I have repeatedly accused them of since 2002, in various legal complaints[13] (et al). However, I do not support making accusations against anyone, based upon known false information.

I accordingly am honour bound to inform you that I herewith retract the aforementioned article provided to you. I furthermore unequivocally apologize, should the photographs have distressed you, they certainly disturbed me greatly.

Please herewith accept my unreserved apologies and retraction of aforementioned article, from the contents of my communication to you.

Respectfully Submitted,

Lara Johnstone, Pro Se Applicant
P O Box 5049, George East, 6539
Tel: (044) 870 7239

Encl. Annexure AA: Transparency Disclosure: Email Correspondence: Lara Johnstone to & from: SA Sucks: Doodler & Lone Wolf. Dates: Friday Oct 30, to Nov 5, 2009

Source: PDF:55K: Encl: PDF:2603K

Cape Bar & Intn'l Bar Assoc: Pro Bono Comm's: RE: Freedom of Speech Political and Cultural Rights, or Secession?; Constitutional, & Intn'l Law Issues

2009-11-01T14:13:00.001-08:00

“Karl Marx had it wrong. Class has, been a major factor in history; but class itself is a derivative concept that is based on the ultimate causative power in history: sex. Control -- or the claim of control -- over the means of reproduction has been even more fundamental to history than has control of the means of production.”
~ Eve's Seed: Biology, the Sexes and the Course of History ~
“Unlike plagues of the dark ages or contemporary diseases which we do not yet understand, the modern plague of overpopulation is soluble by means we have discovered and with resources we possess. What is lacking is not sufficient knowledge of the solution, but universal consciousness of the gravity of the problem and the education of the billions who are it’s victims” -- Martin Luther King
~ Africa, Don't Blame the Whites | The Problem with Africa | Africa's Leaders Need a Paradigm Shift in Their Thinking ~

Letter to Cape Bar & Intn'l Bar Assoc: Pro Bono Committees

Subject: HC-WC In Forma Pauperis (Crimen Injuria) Review Application; RE: Freedom of Speech Political and Cultural Rights, or Secession?; Constitutional, Foreign and International Law Issues

* 09-11-07 Correction Update *
Letter: Notice of (i) Correction of Errors & (ii) Retraction of Enclosure; re: Encl. Your Life is In Danger (www.zasucks.com/?p=6151) (PDF:49K)
Enclosure: Annexure AA: Transparency Disclosure: Email Correspondence: Lara Johnstone to & from: SA Sucks: Doodler & Lone Wolf. Dates: Friday Oct 30, to Nov 5, 2009 (2603K)

Honourable Sirs/Madam,

[1] I am writing to request your Pro Bono Committee’s support, as follows:
[a] [Cape/Intn’l] To peruse the brief overview of legal arguments of fact and law; upon which I wish to found my Application for Leave, and Judicial Review;
[b] [Cape] Assist Mr. Stage, Registrar of the High Court, should he wish to contact you, in suggesting a suitably practicing Attorney or Attorney’s firm, in Capetown (or as relevant), whom the High Court, can accordingly refer my In Forma Pauperis application to, in terms of the provisions of Sub-Rule 1(a) of Rule 40 of the Rules of the High Court;
[c] [Cape/Intn’l] Please forward this correspondence to any Attorney, Attorney’s firm, or as appropriate, whom your Pro Bono committee consider may be interested or suitably qualified to provide me with Pro Bono Legal Assistance, in the capacity of either: (i) representation of counsel, or (ii) assistance of counsel; or (iii) a legal expert in the particular relevant fields of issue.

[2] Brief Summary of Grounds for Leave and Review:
[a] Absence of Jurisdiction: Crimen Injuria is Unconstitutional; State’s Irretrievable Breach of Truth and Reconciliation Social Contract Principles, and Denial of International Political, Civil & Cultural Rights provides legal grounds for Secession.
The law of Crimen Injuria is unconstitutional, in that, it violates the fundamental principle which is the foundation of a ‘democracy’; namely the principle of freedom of speech. In a constitutional republic, there is no such right as the ‘right not to be offended/insulted’.[23]

Denial of International Constitutional Right to a Jury Trial: The denial to South African citizens of access to a Jury Trial, to be judged by a jury of their peers, is unconstitutional, and a violation of the principles of International Political, Civil and Cultural Rights. Furthermore, a democracy is dangerous because it is a one-vote system as opposed to a Republic, which is a three-vote system. Three votes to check tyranny, not just one. Citizens have not been informed of their other two jury votes.

Due Process Irregularity: Denial of Freedom of Religion, Belief, Opinion and Expression, Language, and Linguistic Culture, Admissible and Competent Evidence: » Secession and Self Determination:

Law of Crimen Injuria conflicts with Applicants Radical Hon(our)sty Religion, since the law of Crimen Injuria requires the Applicant to lie, pretend and be a two-faced hypocrite; whenever it may be possible, that someone either with a sensitive ego, or a vengeance minded axe to grind, may choose to pretend to feel offended or insulted, by Applicants honest opinion, shared non-violently, in person to their face (not behind their back): verbally, or in writing[24]; by filing crimen injuria charges, and abusing taxpayers money on criminal prosecutions to massage their ego’s.

Furthermore, if the constitutionality of Crimen Injuria is upheld, at the expense of Applicants Radical Hon(our)sty Cultural Religion, as founded upon (i) Radical Honesty Social Contract[25] and (ii) The Laws of Sustainability[26]; and those on behalf of whom she conducted her original civil disobedience act[27]; then such denial amounts to the final and irretrievable breach and nullification of the Truth and Reconciliation Social Contract[28]; providing for the Applicants international legal standing, for grounds for Secession and Self Determination, in accordance with the principles enunciated in Security Council Resolution of 1244, the “recognition of a human community within a sovereign state enjoying a right to self-determination.” (Radical Hon(our)sty Social Contract Offer: Revolution of “Being Black/ Being White” Consciousness; OR Minutemen Secession?[29])

[b] Gross Irregularities in the Proceedings & The Admission of the State’s Inadmissible or Incompetent Evidence, and the Rejection of Pro Se Defendant’s Admissible and Competent Evidence
Courts Rejection of Applicants Pro Se Admissible and Competent Application: Notice of Intention: Correct the Record: Withdrawal of Formal Admissions (PDF[30]; Proof of Service PDF[31])

Courts Rejection of Applicants Pro Se Admissible and Competent Application: Notice of Intention: Application for Leave, and Judicial Review (PDF[32], Proof of Service PDF[33]), filed subsequent to conviction, with supporting Affidavits, by two expert witnesses, supporting the Founding Affidavit (PDF[34]):

Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, evidencing the legal, psychological, and socio-political ‘citizens privilege’, Nuremberg Principles skills and competencies of Individual Responsibility, required for acts of civil disobedience to perceived illegitimate authority; and their application to the common law ‘reasonableness test’ (PDF[35])

Affidavit of Leonard George Horowitz evidencing the Origin of AIDS sourcing from Hepatitus B Vaccine experiments conducted by Agents and Agencies of the Federal Government of the United States of America and the Merck Pharmaceutical Company (PDF[36])

Courts Rejection of Applicants Pro Se Admissible and Competent Application Prior to Conviction: Legal Argument: Political Necessity, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF37]; Proof of Service PDF)

Courts Indifferent and Repeated Rejection of all Applicants Pro Se Applications, with the requirement that the content thereof is unworthy of serious impartial consideration, unless the legal format and application process procedures of its submittal meets the exact same legal standards as those required of qualified legal representatives, demonstrates the courts choice to act as a Critical Legal Literacy Interpreter Parasite instead of a Legal Social Engineer[39]; not to mention a confirmation of the facts, to which the court and State repeatedly demonstrated their indifference; as –- for example -- stated Applicants Application for Leave, and Judicial Review, dated 22 September 2009 [Pt 10] (PDF[40], Proof of Service PDF[41])
South African Law Commission Issue Paper Six, alleged the Criminal Justice System to have a severe Legitimacy and Inefficiency Crisis, in that:
Communities are intimidated by the legal system, and ignorant of how it works.
Legal representation is inadequate and discriminatory.
Legal aid has not been able to serve its intended purpose.
The justice system's inaccessibility means it is perceived as illegitimate, ineffective, unfriendly, resulting in alternative dispute resolution whether legal or illegal.
Unnecessary complexities brought into access to justice and the mystifying language used.

Due Process Irregularity: Denial of Nuremberg Principles Skills and Competencies in interpretation and application of common law ‘reasonableness test’ [Application and Interpretation of the Bill of Rights, in terms of the Common Law, International Law and Foreign Law; & spirit, purport and object of Bill of Rights]

Courts Incorrect Interpretation of the Unreasonableness Test, and application thereof to Crimen Injuria: The correct test the court should have applied, was not the ‘man on the Clapham omnibus test’, but the test of the ordinary skilled political activist exercising or professing to have the special skills, in non-violently, by means of civil disobedience Nuremberg and ‘citizens privilege’ principles, confronting – perceived to be -- illegal political authority[42].(Affidavit: Brad Blanton PDF[43])

Due Process Irregularity: Denial of Access to Information and Just Administrative Action Principles, and Admissible and Competent Evidence.

Plaintiff’s Use of Crimen Injuria Charges were not honourable: Plaintiffs Intentions: Political Persecution of Applicant; by means of Perjury, and Fraud.
State’s Prosecution of Crimen Injuria Charges were not honourable: Irregular and Illegal Actions of Complicity to Plaintiff’s Perjury, Fraud and Political Persecution of Applicant.

Courts Refusal to allow Applicant the opportunity to invoke the Political Necessity Defence [Civil Disobedience and the Necessity Defence, John Alan Cohen, Pierce Law Review (PDF[44])]; renders Applicants Formal Admissions -- made, as required by, the Political Necessity Defence – null and void

Court made irregular use of Applicants Null and Void Formal Admissions, as factual evidence to its findings of Guilt of the Applicant.
Courts Refusal to accept Applicants Formal Admission Facts, as sufficient proof of such facts; renders (i) Applicants Formal Admissions as null and void; (ii) shows that 84% of the politicians who received the ‘crimen injuria’ text messages, considered them to be lawful, because they did not file any charges of crimen injuria; accordingly the crimen injuria text messages do not pass the crimen injuria ‘reasonableness test’, when only one out of six text message recipients, allegedly considered them to be an ‘insult to their dignity’; the exact same recipient who committed perjury in her affidavit and on the witness stand. (SAPS: Complaint of Perjury, Fraud & Persecution against Hon. Patricia de Lille PDF[45])
Courts Refusal to Honour Applicants Notice to Correct the Record: Withdrawal of Formal Admissions, in accordance with Criminal Procedure Act § 105A Plea and Sentence Agreement principles.

[3]Crimen Injuria, Freedom of Speech (Secrecy/Transparency), Human Rights, SA Constitution, International Human Rights, Secession, Justification Defenses & Jury Nullification Legal Experts.

Furthermore, I have also CC’d the following, Legal Experts on these issues, who may, or may not, be willing to consider providing a bit of Pro Bono assistance, in regards to their particular areas of expertise, if so requested:
Prof. Jonathan Burchell[46], Professor of Law, UCT. Professor Burchell is not only a legal expert on Criminal Law and Procedure; but also on Crimen Injuria; as the co-author of Personality Rights and Freedom of Expression: The Modern Actio Injuriarum (1998) Juta & Co. Ltd;
Crimen Injuria Legal Authorities, among others:
In Primary Legal Code Word: Crimen Injuria, and Decoding Crimen Injuria & Racially Offensive Language: Legal Case Law et al, under Propositions of Law with Reference to Authorities, and Application of Facts to Propositions of Law, as found in State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF[47]; Proof of Service PDF[48])

Prof. Richard Calland[49], Assoc. Prof of Law: Constitutional, Human Rights & Administrative Law, specialising in the law and practice of the right to access to information and whistleblowing protection; in administrative justice, public ethics and constitutional design. He is a member of the Transparency Task team of the Institute for Public Dialogue at Columbia University, which is led by Professor Joseph Stiglitz.
Transparency Quotes and Argument, among others:
S v Hoho (493/05) [2008] ZASCA 98; [2009] 1 All SA 103 (SCA) ; 2009 (1) SACR 276 (SCA) (17 September 2008), as per: Decoding Crimen Injuria & Racially Offensive Language: Legal Case Law et al, under Propositions of Law with Reference to Authorities, and Application of Facts to Propositions of Law found in State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF[50]; Proof of Service[51])
Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone (PDF[52]; Proof of Service[53])
Supporting Affidavit of Dr. Len G. Horowitz (PDF[54]: Proof of Service[55])
Supporting Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D (PDF[56]: Proof of Service[57])
Complaint to SAHRC (WC-2009-0455BS): Crimes Against Peace, Crimes Against Humanity & Crime of Apartheid (PDF[58]; Service[59])

Prof. Thomas Bennet[60], Prof. Customary & Public International Law, UCT, expert on customary law and human rights; teaches principles governing foreign judgements in South African private international law; principles of public international law; and international law on disputes.
Customary Law: Radical Hon(our)sty Cultural Religion, among others:
Justification Defence: Political Necessity: (I) Freedom of Speech: Radical Hon(our)sty Cultural Religious Practice; (II) Disobedience to Legalisation of Evil/Nullification of TRC-RSA Social Contract, as found in Brief Statement of Defendant: Justification Defence: Political Necessity: (PDF[61]; Court Proceedings, 08 July 2009; et al: Proof of Service[62])
Propositions of Law with Reference to Authorities, and Application of Facts to Propositions of Law found in State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF[63]; Proof of Service[64])
Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone (PDF[65]; Proof of Service[66])
Supporting Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D (PDF[67]: Proof of Service[68])
Complaint to SAHRC (WC-2009-0455BS): Crimes Against Peace, Crimes Against Humanity & Crime of Apartheid (PDF[69]; Service[70])

Prof. Pierre de Vos[71] is the Claude Leon Foundation Chair in Constitutional Governance and teaches in the area of Constitutional Law, at UCT. He is also the chairperson of the Board of the Aids Legal Network.
Human Rights & International Law Quotes (Too many to refer to all)
Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone (PDF[72]; Proof of Service[73])
Supporting Affidavit of Dr. Len G. Horowitz (PDF[74]: Proof of Service[75])
Supporting Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D (PDF[76]: Proof of Service[77])
Complaint to SAHRC (WC-2009-0455BS): Crimes Against Peace, Crimes Against Humanity & Crime of Apartheid (PDF[78]; Service[79])

Prof. Wouter de Vos[80], teaches law of evidence and criminal procedure. He is a member of the Council of the International Association of Procedural Law and a member of the International Civil Litigation Committee of the International Law Association.

Professor Francis A. Boyle[81], Professor of Law: International Law & Human Rights, at Univ. of Chicago. He is the author of Protesting Power: War, Resistance and Law (Rowman & Littlefield Inc. 2007) which has been used successfully in anti-war protest trials. In the September 2000 issue of the prestigious The International History Review, Professor Boyle's Foundations of World Order: The Legalist Approach to International Relations (1898-1922) was proclaimed as “a major contribution to this reinterrogation of the past” and “required reading for historians, political scientists, international relations specialists, and policy-makers.”
Human Rights & International Law Quotes (Too many to refer to all)
Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone (PDF[82]; Proof of Service[83])
Supporting Affidavit of Dr. Len G. Horowitz (PDF[84]: Proof of Service[85])
Supporting Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D PDF[86]: Proof of Service[87])
Complaint to SAHRC (WC-2009-0455BS): Crimes Against Peace, Crimes Against Humanity & Crime of Apartheid (PDF[88]; Service[89])

Prof. Christian Tomuschat[90], Emeritus Professor of Public International Law and European Law at Humboldt University in Berlin; former member of the UN Human Rights Committee and the UN’s International Law Commission. He is the author of Secession and Self-Determination, in Marcelo G. Kohen, Secession: International Law Perspectives, Cambridge 2006; wherein he comments on among others, how Security Council Resolution of 1244, “displaying recognition of a human community within a sovereign state enjoying a right to self-determination” (p34).
Secession Quotes, among others:
“Radical Hon(our)sty Social Contract Offer[91]: Revolution of “Being Black/ Being White” Consciousness; OR Minutemen Secession?”, at Pt.60, stated as the Heading for the Conclusion, in Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone, in Support of Application for Leave, and Judicial Review (PDF[92]; Proof of Service[93])

Prof David Skover[94], Frederic C. Tausend Professor of Law, at University of Seattle Law School; the author of among others, The Tactics of Legal Reasoning, and The death of Discourse, and The Trials of Lenny Bruce. In 2003, Skover and his coauthor, Ron Collins, successfully petitioned Governor Pataki of New York State to posthumously pardon Lenny Bruce. In 2004, they received the Hugh Hefner First Amendment Award for The Trials of Lenny Bruce and their pardon effort.
Prof. Kover quoted:
Law: Critical Literacy Interpretation of Legal Code Words: under Propositions of Law with Reference to Authorities in State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF[95]; Proof of Service[96])

Lenny Bruce Quotes:
Consequences of Suppression of ‘Nigger’, in ‘Kaffir’: Prevailing Norms of Society: Community Values and Thinking[97]; and in
WHO: Mutual Help Destiny Control Colleagues: A Guide for Peaceful Revolution in South Africa in An Essay on Proudly South African Parasite Hypocrisy: Fraudulent 'Rehabilitation' Boomerang: Correctional Services Prison Policies As A Major Intentional Source of New South Africa's 'Kaffirs' AKA 'Criminals' (PDF[98]; Proof of Service, 2004[99]) (Proof of Service: 13 Aug 09[100]), (Proof of Service, 23 Sept 09[101]: Annex AA01c]

Prof. James Joseph Duane[102], Assoc. Professor at Regents Law School, Virginia Beach, VA: Author of among others: Jurors Handbook: A Citizens Guide to Jury Duty, which includes: Jury Nullification: The Top Secret Constitutional Right[103].
Jury Nullification Quotes:
Decoding: Legal Justification: Jury Nullification; under Propositions of Law with Reference to Authorities, and Application of Facts to Propositions of Law, as found in State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF[104; Proof of Service[105])
Jurors Handbook, submitted as Evidentiary document to Application for Leave, and Judicial Review, dated 22 September 2009 (PDF[106], Proof of Service PDF[107])

Dr. Robert Schopp[108] is Professor of Law and Psychology at Univ. of Nebraska, and the author of Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Law: Justification Defenses and Just Convictions[109]. This major study advances an interpretation of criminal justification defenses (including necessity and nullification) that views them as an integral component of the structure of criminal law. It integrates philosophical analysis with a consideration of contemporary applications, & shows how these defenses are key components of criminal law, in the relationship between legal & moral justification.
Justification Defence: Political Necessity, references, among others:
Justification Defence: Political Necessity: (I) Freedom of Speech: Radical Hon(our)sty Cultural Religious Practice; (II) Disobedience to Legalisation of Evil/Nullification of TRC-RSA Social Contract, as found in Brief Statement of Defendant: Justification Defence: Political Necessity: (PDF[110]; Court Proceedings, 08 July 2009; et al: Proof of Service[111])
Propositions of Law with Reference to Authorities, and Application of Facts to Propositions of Law found in State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF[112]; Proof of Service[113])
Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone (PDF[114]; Proof of Service[115])
Supporting Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D (PDF[116]: Proof of Service[117])
Complaint to SAHRC (WC-2009-0455BS): Crimes Against Peace, Crimes Against Humanity & Crime of Apartheid (PDF[118]; Service[119])

Attorney Lowell (Larry) Becraft, Jr.[120], is a constitutional attorney based in Huntsville, Alabama, who specializes in criminal defense cases, primarily defending federal income tax protestors. Attorney Becraft is the attorney for Dr. Leonard Horowitz, whose Affidavit as an expert witness is filed in this matter, as a Written Statement of Consent in terms of § 213 of the Criminal Procedure Act: Affidavit of Leonard George Horowitz evidencing the Origin of AIDS sourcing from Hepatitus B Vaccine experiments conducted by Agents and Agencies of the Federal Government of the United States of America and the Merck Pharmaceutical Company. (PDF[121]: Proof of Service[122]; Proof of Service to SAHRC[123])

Attorney Katya Komisaruk[124] Just Law Collective[125], Oakland, CA. Attorney Komisaruk is an ‘anarchist lawyer’, who specialises in defending and advising protestors engaged in civil disobedience tactics. She perhaps best known for her successful defense of hundreds of demonstrators arrested during the 1999 World Trade Organisation meeting in Seattle. She is a Harvard educated lawyer, who can speak with authority on the repercussions of civil disobedience, from personal experience of two years she spent in prison for vandalizing nuclear weapons navigational equipment at Vandenburg Air Force Base in 1987.

Jon Roland[126], Founder & President of the Constitution Society. He is the 2002 and 2006 Nominee of the Texas Libertarian Party for Texas Attorney General; and currently exploring a ‘Ron Paul Libertarian like’ candidacy for the U.S. Senate in Texas. He has done a great deal of work in the field of constitutional history. Speaker at We The People Congress conference in Alexandria VA, 2007: Common Constitutional Errors. Accepted by a court in Williamson County, Texas in 2005, as an expert witness on constitutional and legal history. Seeks to revive the constitutional militia system envisioned by the Founders, involving the organizing and training of the entire population to defend their communities against threats, including threats from terrorism, foreign invasion, insurrection, crime, and disasters, and to secure national borders against unlawful entry. Discussed in Jonathan Karl, The Right to Bear Arms: The Rise of America's New Militias, HarperCollins, New York (1995).

Dated at George, Southern Cape, South Africa, on this day, the 28th of October, 2009

Lara Johnstone, Pro Se Applicant
Per: P O Box 5049, George East, 6539
Tel: (044) 870 7239

» » » » [PDF Archive: In Forma Pauperis Correspondence]

George Monbiot: Credibility depleting faster than oil

2009-11-01T14:12:00.006-08:00

“... World population growth is widely recognized within the Government as a current danger of the highest magnitude calling for urgent measures...... it is of the utmost urgency that governments now recognize the facts and implications of population growth, determine the ultimate population sizes that make sense for their countries and start vigorous programs at once to achieve their desired goals.”
“... population factors are indeed critical in, and often determinants of, violent conflict in developing areas. Segmental (religious, social, racial) differences, migration, rapid population growth, differential levels of knowledge and skills, rural/urban differences, population pressure and the spatial location of population in relation to resources -- in this rough order of importance -- all appear to be important contributions to conflict and violence... Clearly, conflicts which are regarded in primarily political terms often have demographic roots. Recognition of these relationships appears crucial to any understanding or prevention of such hostilities.”
“...there is general agreement that up to the point when cost per acceptor rises rapidly, family planning expenditures are generally considered the best investment a country can make in its own future.”
~ National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth ~

George Monbiot: Credibility depleting faster than oil

Mail & Guardian, UK

Nov 17 2009 08:04

Declining respect for the instruments of collective government as they are used increasingly by the elites to preserve or increase their share of a declining resource base.Do you observe any of these symptoms in your "real world"? If you do, you should suspect that your society is in advanced stages of overshoot.
18July 2006 :: PeakOil_RSA Briefing Paper

I don't know when global oil supplies will start to decline. I do know that another resource has already peaked and gone into free fall: the credibility of the body that's meant to assess them. Last week two whistleblowers from the International Energy Agency alleged that it has deliberately upgraded its estimate of the world's oil supplies in order not to frighten the markets. Three days later, a paper published by researchers at Uppsala University in Sweden showed that the IEA's forecasts must be wrong, because it assumes a rate of extraction that appears to be impossible. The agency's assessment of the state of global oil supplies is beginning to look as reliable as Alan Greenspan's blandishments about the health of the financial markets.

Is gross mismanagement of the nation's energy policy an impeachable offense?
18 July 06 :: PeakOilRSA :: Briefing Paper

If the whistleblowers are right, we should be stockpiling ammunition. If we are taken by surprise, if we have failed to replace oil before the supply peaks then crashes, the global economy is stuffed. But nothing the whistle-blowers said has scared me as much as the conversation I had last week with a Pembrokeshire farmer.

Wyn Evans, who runs a mixed farm of 170 acres, has been trying to reduce his dependency on fossil fuels since 1977. He has installed an anaerobic digester, a wind turbine, solar panels and a ground-sourced heat pump. He has sought wherever possible to replace diesel with his own electricity. Instead of using his tractor to spread slurry, he pumps it from the digester on to nearby fields. He's replaced his tractor-driven irrigation system with an electric one, and set up a new system for drying hay indoors, which means he has to turn it in the field only once. Whatever else he does is likely to produce smaller savings. But these innovations have reduced his use of diesel by only about 25%.

According to farm scientists at Cornell University, cultivating one hectare of maize in the United States requires 40 litres of petrol and 75 litres of diesel. The amazing productivity of modern farm labour has been purchased at the cost of a dependency on oil. Unless farmers can change the way it's grown, a permanent oil shock would price food out of the mouths of many of the world's people. Any responsible government would be asking urgent questions about how long we have got.

Instead, most of them delegate this job to the International Energy Agency. I've been bellyaching about the British government's refusal to make contingency plans for the possibility that oil might peak by 2020 for the past two years, and I'm beginning to feel like a madman with a sandwich board. Perhaps I am, but how lucky do you feel? The new World Energy Outlook published by the IEA last week expects the global demand for oil to rise from 85-million barrels a day in 2008 to 105-million in 2030. Oil production will rise to 103-million barrels, it says, and biofuels will make up the shortfall. If we want the oil, it will materialise.

Today, 6.5 billion humans depend entirely on oil for food, energy, plastics & chemicals. Population growth is on a collision course with the inevitable decline in oil production.
Oil, Smoke & Mirrors

The agency does caution that conventional oil is likely to "approach a plateau" towards the end of this period, but there's no hint of the graver warning that the IEA's chief economist issued when I interviewed him last year: "We still expect that it will come around 2020 to a plateau ... I think time is not on our side here." Almost every year the agency has been forced to downgrade its forecast for the daily supply of oil in 2030: from 123-million barrels in 2004, to 120-million in 2005, 116-million in 2007, 106-million in 2008 and 103-million this year. But according to one of the whistleblowers, "even today's number is much higher than can be justified, and the International Energy Agency knows this".

The Uppsala report, published in the journal Energy Policy, anticipates that maximum global production of all kinds of oil in 2030 will be 76-million barrels per day. Analysing the IEA's figures, it finds that to meet its forecasts for supply, the world's new and undiscovered oilfields would have to be developed at a rate "never before seen in history". As many of them are in politically or physically difficult places, and as capital is short, this looks impossible. Assessing existing fields, the likely rate of discovery and the use of new techniques for extraction, the researchers find that "the peak of world oil production is probably occurring now".

Are they right? Who knows? Last month the UK Energy Research Centre published a massive review of all the available evidence on global oil supplies. It found that the date of peak oil will be determined not by the total size of the global resource but by the rate at which it can be exploited. New discoveries would have to be implausibly large to make a significant difference: even if a field the size of all the oil reserves ever struck in the US were miraculously discovered, it would delay the date of peaking by only four years. As global discoveries peaked in the 1960s, a find like this doesn't seem very likely.

Regional oil supplies have peaked when about one third of the total resource has been extracted: this is because the rate of production falls as the remaining oil becomes harder to shift when the fields are depleted. So the assumption in the IEA's new report, that oil production will hold steady when the global resource has fallen "to around one half by 2030" looks unsafe. The UK Energy Research Centre's review finds that, just to keep oil supply at present levels, "more than two thirds of current crude oil production capacity may need to be replaced by 2030 ... At best, this is likely to prove extremely challenging." There is, it says "a significant risk of a peak in conventional oil production before 2020". Unconventional oil won't save us: even a crash programme to develop the Canadian tar sands could deliver only five million barrels a day by 2030.

As a report commissioned by the US Department of Energy shows, an emergency programme to replace current energy supplies or equipment to anticipate peak oil would need about 20 years to take effect. It seems unlikely that we have it. The world economy is probably knackered, whatever we might do now. But at least we could save farming. There are two possible options: either the mass replacement of farm machinery or the development of new farming systems that don't need much labour or energy.

There are no obvious barriers to the mass production of electric tractors and combine harvesters: the weight of the batteries and an electric vehicle's low-end torque are both advantages for tractors. A switch to forest gardening and other forms of permaculture is trickier, especially for producing grain; but such is the scale of the creeping emergency that we can't afford to rule anything out.

The challenge of feeding seven or eight billion people while oil supplies are falling is stupefying. It'll be even greater if governments keep pretending that it isn't going to happen. - guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media 2009

Source: Mail & Guardian, UK

CCR5 Delta32 Gene's Black Death & AIDS Mystery

2009-11-01T14:12:00.005-08:00

“... World population growth is widely recognized within the Government as a current danger of the highest magnitude calling for urgent measures...... it is of the utmost urgency that governments now recognize the facts and implications of population growth, determine the ultimate population sizes that make sense for their countries and start vigorous programs at once to achieve their desired goals.”
“... population factors are indeed critical in, and often determinants of, violent conflict in developing areas. Segmental (religious, social, racial) differences, migration, rapid population growth, differential levels of knowledge and skills, rural/urban differences, population pressure and the spatial location of population in relation to resources -- in this rough order of importance -- all appear to be important contributions to conflict and violence... Clearly, conflicts which are regarded in primarily political terms often have demographic roots. Recognition of these relationships appears crucial to any understanding or prevention of such hostilities.”
“...there is general agreement that up to the point when cost per acceptor rises rapidly, family planning expenditures are generally considered the best investment a country can make in its own future.”
~ National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth ~

CCR5 Delta32 Gene's Black Death & AIDS Mystery

PBS: Secrets of the Dead

Frequencies of the CCR5 allele

EPIDEMIOLOGICAL STUDIES OF PERSONS WITH THE CCR5 DELTA-32 MUTATION
The delta-32 mutation of the CCR5 receptor gene is present in up to 20% of the white population worldwide.8 Persons who have 2 copies of this mutant gene have been shown to be highly resistant to HIV infection; those with a single copy can be infected but experience an attenuated course of disease.9
-- The AIDS Reader

Plaque commemorating Black Plague

CCR5: Evolving hypotheses
When the CCR5-delta32 mutation was first discovered — and when its restriction to European populations was identified — scientists hypothesized that the mutation had been favored because it offered resistance to an intense epidemic largely restricted to Europe: the bubonic plague pandemic of the Middle Ages. However, when scientists studied ancient DNA from 2900-year-old skeletal remains, they found that the mutation was common in European populations long before the plague epidemics. Further research and several lines of evidence suggested that smallpox may have been the more likely culprit. New research has offered yet another hypothesis. The genetic variation associated with the mutation is similar to the genetic variation associated with neutral mutants. Perhaps, the CCR5 mutant drifted to high frequencies in Europe through nothing more than luck. Researchers continue to investigate the possibilities — but meanwhile, there is little doubt that the CCR5 mutant offers a significant survival advantage to those at risk of HIV infection.
-- Understanding Evolution

Plague Boils on Human Skin

No one knows exactly why, but in the late 1320s or early 1330s, bubonic plague broke out in China's Gobi desert. Spread by flea-infested rats, it didn't take long for the disease to reach Europe. In October of 1347, a Genoese ship fleet returning from the Black Sea -- a key trade link with China -- landed in Messina, Sicily. Most of those on board were already dead, and the ships were ordered out of harbor. But it was too late. The town was soon overcome with pestilence, and from there, the disease quickly spread north along trade routes -- through Italy and across the European continent. By the following spring, it had reached as far north as England, and within five years, it had killed 25 million people -- one-third of the European population.

Spread of Bubonic Plague

The bubonic plague is caused by a bacterium called Yersinia pestis and is characterized by chills, fever, vomiting, diarrhea, and the formation of black boils in the armpits, neck, and groin. Though the disease was originally called the "Great Mortality" and the "Great Pestilence," the name "Black Death" was eventually adopted because of these black boils, which derive their color from dried blood under the skin caused by internal bleeding. In certain cases the bacterium spreads to the victims' lungs, causing them to fill with frothy, bloody liquid. This derivation of the disease is called pneumonic plague, and can quickly spread from person to person through the air. It is almost always lethal.

Eyam, England

The plague first spread to Britain in 1348, travelling from Bristol to Oxford and London in several days. More than three hundred years later, in 1665, perhaps the worst of the English epidemics broke out in London. That summer, the nobility and clergy fled the city, as some 7,000 people died each week. As many as 100,000 lives were lost before winter killed the fleas and the epidemic tapered off. Contemporary medicine could provide no explanation for the sickness, and most doctors were afraid to offer treatment. In an attempt to keep from being infected, the few physicians who did risk exposure wore leather masks with glass eyes and a long beak filled with herbs and spices that were thought to ward off the illness. Even one person in a household showing plague-like symptoms was enough to mandate a 40-day quarantine for the whole home -- a virtual death sentence for everyone living in it.

Hilltop View of Eyam, England

In September 1665, George Viccars, a tailor in the small, central-England village of Eyam, received a parcel of cloth ridden with plague-infected fleas from London. Four days later, Viccars died. By the end of the month, five more villagers had succumbed to the plague. The panicked town turned to their rector, William Mompesson, who persuaded them to quarantine the entire village to prevent the bacterium from spreading throughout the region. It seemed like suicide. A year later, the first outsiders ventured into Eyam, expecting a ghost town. Yet, miraculously, half the town had survived. How did so many villagers live through the most devastating disease known to man?

John Clifford examining the Eyam parish register

Local Eyam lore tells befuddling stories of plague survivors who had close contact with the bacterium but never caught the disease. Elizabeth Hancock buried six children and her husband in a week, but never became ill. The village gravedigger handled hundreds of plague-ravaged corpses, but survived as well. Could these people have somehow been immune to the Black Death?

Dr. Stephen O'Brien of the National Institutes of Health in Washington D.C. suggests they were. His work with HIV and the mutated form of the gene CCR5, called "delta 32," led him to Eyam. In 1996, research showed that delta 32 prevents HIV from entering human cells and infecting the body. O'Brien thought this principle could be applied to the plague bacteria, which affects the body in a similar manner. To determine whether the Eyam plague survivors may have carried delta 32, O'Brien tested the DNA of their modern-day descendents. What he found out was startling. ...

Joan Plant, tracing family tree

For a disease-causing microorganism to infect the human body there must be a gateway or portal through which it enters into human cells. The plague bacterium works this way, hijacking the white blood cells sent to eliminate it. Traveling inside the white blood cells to the lymph nodes, the bacteria break out and attack the focal point of the human immune system. Dr. Stephen O'Brien felt that the mutated CCR5 gene, delta 32, may have prevented the plague from being able to enter its host's white blood cells.

Eyam provided O'Brien an ideal opportunity to test this theory. Specifically, Eyam was an isolated population known to have survived a plague epidemic. Everyone in the town would have been exposed to the bacterium, so it's likely that any life-saving genetic trait would have been possessed by each of these survivors. "Like a Xerox machine," says O'Brien, "their gene frequencies have been replicated for several generations without a lot of infusion from outside," thus providing a viable pool of survivor-descendents who would have inherited such a trait.

Dr. Bill Paxton examines Steve Crohn's DNA.

Knowing who died and who lived through the early years of the plague is somewhat problematic. Deaths among the general English population were not recorded in the 14th Century -- the height of the Plague -- and most communities did not begin recording parish registers until around 1538. Fortunately, Eyam began keeping a parish register in 1630. Thus historian John Clifford began by examining the register, noting everyone who was alive in 1665, the year the plague came to Eyam. He searched for evidence of life through the year 1725 -- marriages, baptisms, burials that took place years after the plague had left the village. Deleting the names of those lost during the plague period, he was able to determine who the survivors were.

DNA samples could only be collected from direct descendents of the plague survivors. DNA is the principal component of chromosomes, which carry the genes that transmit hereditary characteristics. We inherit our DNA from our parents, thus Eyam resident Joan Plant, for instance, may have inherited the delta 32 mutation from one of her ancient relatives. Plant can trace her mother's lineage back ten generations to the Blackwell siblings, Francis and Margaret, who both lived through the plague to the turn of the 18th century. The next step was to harvest a DNA sample from Joan and the other descendants. DNA is found in the nuclei of cells. The amount is constant in all typical cells, regardless of the size or function of that cell. One of the easiest methods of obtaining a DNA tissue sample is to take a cheek, or buccal, swab.

Crohn's blood, resisting infection.

After three weeks of testing at University College in London, delta 32 had been found in 14% of the samples. This is a genetically significant percentage, yet what, really, did it mean? Could the villagers have inherited delta 32 from elsewhere, residents who had moved to the community in the 350 years since the plague? Was this really a higher percentage than anywhere else? To find out, O'Brien assembled an international team of scientists to test for the presence of delta 32 around the world. "Native Africans did not have delta 32 at all," O'Brien says, "and when we looked at East Asians and Indians, they were also flat zero." In fact, the levels of delta 32 found in Eyam were only matched in regions of Europe that had been affected by the plague and in America, which was, for the most part, settled by European plague survivors and their descendents.

Spread of the Plague

Meanwhile, recent work with another disease strikingly similar to the plague, AIDS, suggests O'Brien was on the right track. HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, tricks the immune system in a similar manner as the plague bacterium, targeting and taking over white blood cells. Virologist Dr. Bill Paxton at the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center in New York City noticed, "the center had no study of people who were exposed to HIV but who had remained negative." He began testing the blood of high-risk, HIV-negative individuals like Steve Crohn, exposing their blood to three thousand times the amount of HIV normally needed to infect a cell. Steve's blood never became infected. "We thought maybe we had infected the culture with bacteria or whatever," says Paxton. "So we went back to Steve. But it was the same result. We went back again and again. Same result." Paxton began studying Crohn's DNA, and concluded there was some sort of blocking mechanism preventing the virus from binding to his cells. Further research showed that that mechanism was delta 32.

Scientists studying HIV first learned about the gateway-blocking capacity of the CCR5 mutation in 1996. Several drug companies, then, quickly began exploring the possibility of developing pharmaceuticals that would mimic delta 32 by binding to CCR5 and blocking the attachment of HIV. Previous methods of treatment interfered with HIV's ability to replicate after the virus has already entered a cell. This new class of HIV treatment, called early-inhibitor -- or fusion-inhibitor -- drugs seek to prevent the virus from ever attaching at all. These pharmaceuticals are still in relatively early stages of development, but certainly stand as a hopeful new method of approaching HIV treatment.

Source: PBS: Secrets of the Dead

Ecologically-minded liberals should also heed Dr. Salter’s work, for only when Third-World populations are made to bear the consequences of their own reproductive irresponsibility will they, and the world as a whole, establish population policies that protect the environment. Closing off the “safety valve” of Third-World immigration to the West should be as attractive to the sincere left as to the racial right.

CCR5 Delta32 Gene's Black Death & AIDS Mystery

Interview with Dr. Stephen O'Brien

Dr. Stephen O'Brien

You may possess a genetic mutation. Most people would probably be aghast to learn that one of their genes is malformed. But before you start asking, "What does that mean? Will it make me sick someday? Will I pass it on to my children?" bear in mind that a mutation of the CCR5 gene -- called "delta 32" in its mutated form -- has no adverse effect on humans. In fact, possessing delta 32 could save your life, and the lives of your children.

"It's highly unusual," says Dr. Stephen J. O'Brien of the National Institutes of Health in Washington D.C. "Most genes, if you knock them out, cause serious diseases like cystic fibrosis or sickle cell anemia or diabetes. But CCR5-delta32 is rather innocuous to its carriers. The reason seems to be that the normal function of CCR5 is redundant in our genes; that several other genes can perform the same function."

"The non-mutated form is what's called a chemokine receptor," he says. Chemokines are protein distress calls released by an injured region of your body. "The normal function of the CCR5 gene is to act as a retriever of the chemokine distress signal from these bruises, which will then be alleviated by the chemokines."

This may not sound exciting, but delta 32 is a powerful mistake. HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, attacks the human immune system, infecting the white blood cells sent to destroy it. The delta 32 mutation, however, effectively blocks the crucial gateway into human cells the virus needs. In the case of Steve Crohn, whose partner was the fifth person to die from AIDS, possessing the CCR5 mutation has prevented him from contracting the virus.

O'Brien explains further, "In order to have total resistance to HIV, you have to carry two doses of the mutated gene -- one from each parent. If you get only one dose, you will not be resistant to infection. However, you may be able to delay the onset of HIV once you become infected. That's because, in patients with one copy of the mutation, the amount of 'portals' or 'doorways' that HIV can use is reduced by about 50 percent. That slows down virus replication, which is the most important factor in AIDS progression."

O'Brien's work on AIDS led him to another disease that delta 32 could prevent, the plague. "They both, upon entering the body, infect the macrophages, which are the first line of defense against bacterial infections," he says. "Over the course of evolution, many bugs and pathogens have become extinct because the body learned how to defend itself against them. So the ones that are around today, like HIV and the plague, are pretty savvy -- HIV, for example, specifically attacks and kills the very cells that are designed to kill it. Both these pathogens have developed very clever ways around our immunological defenses."

Eyam Plague Cottage

The results of the Eyam study suggest that delta 32 may have helped save Europe from the bubonic plague pandemic. It seems logical, then, that this could be confirmed by an experiment in which the plague bacterium is injected into the cells of someone possessing the delta 32 mutation. "We have attempted to design experiments that allow us to expose the plague to the lymphocytes of different people, including Steve Crohn," O'Brien says. "But so far we haven't been able to design that kind of experiment ... to do that experiment, you would need to isolate that particular kind of cell. You would need to isolate the exact strain of the plague, and you would need to expose them together."

Nevertheless, delta 32 seems to be a formidable defense the human body has developed in response to ages of pathogenic exposure. And though we may just be getting acquainted with it, delta 32 has been protecting humans for ages. O'Brien suspects the mutation has been around since long before the Black Death. "There have been human remains dug up from graves in Scandinavia -- bodies 3,000 and 4,000 years old -- in which they actually found the mutation, through DNA typing. So there are all kinds of pieces in this puzzle that are coming together."

Source: PBS: Secrets of the Dead
DNA Test for CCR5/Delta32

Former Finnish Provincial Medical Officer Says Vaccines Are Eugenics Weapon

2009-11-01T13:44:00.000-08:00

“... World population growth is widely recognized within the Government as a current danger of the highest magnitude calling for urgent measures...... it is of the utmost urgency that governments now recognize the facts and implications of population growth, determine the ultimate population sizes that make sense for their countries and start vigorous programs at once to achieve their desired goals.”
“... population factors are indeed critical in, and often determinants of, violent conflict in developing areas. Segmental (religious, social, racial) differences, migration, rapid population growth, differential levels of knowledge and skills, rural/urban differences, population pressure and the spatial location of population in relation to resources -- in this rough order of importance -- all appear to be important contributions to conflict and violence... Clearly, conflicts which are regarded in primarily political terms often have demographic roots. Recognition of these relationships appears crucial to any understanding or prevention of such hostilities.”
“...there is general agreement that up to the point when cost per acceptor rises rapidly, family planning expenditures are generally considered the best investment a country can make in its own future.”
~ National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth ~

Former Finnish Provincial Medical Officer Says Vaccines Are Eugenics Weapon

InfoWars

Source: InfoWars

The truth is the real casualty of the Reitz video

2009-10-30T02:45:00.000-07:00

Hateful or not, interracial violent crime is overwhelmingly black on white or black on Asian. The Department of Justice's figures show that between 2001 and 2003, blacks were 39 times more likely to commit violent crimes against whites than the reverse. Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving blacks and whites, blacks commit 85 percent and whites commit 15 percent.
You won't hear about that from the Southern Poverty Law Center or see it on the evening newscasts, because the truth is one thing and the liberal agenda is another.
~ Racial Justice Racket: Exploiting Black Pain & White Guilt:: King of the Hate Business | Who Loves Hate Crimes? | Hustling Hate @ Poverty Palace ~

The truth is the real casualty of the Reitz video

SAmizdat

27 October 2009

Afrikaans is my home language but I am deliberately writing this in English, because of my extreme levels of irritation with the distortions, half-truths and outright lies being perpetrated by especially the liberal media and the left wing about the Reitz students, who made the so-called racist video involving cleaners at the University of the Free State. Most of the perpetrators of these malicious lies do, of course, understand Afrikaans, but for reasons of sycophancy or anti-Afrikaner hatred, pretend they don’t.

The facts of this incident make a complete and utter mockery of the hysterical screaming of the liberals and left wingers. It is trivially easy, using the demonstrable facts, to completely demolish the pack of lies on which the entire Reitz House “case” against the 4 students has been built. Not that liberals and left-wingers have even the slightest interest in the facts or the truth, however, especially not when it suits their nefarious purposes to deliberately ignore or distort the facts.
The video is not racist. It was, on the contrary, made as a satirical response to anti-white racism, the ethnic cleansing of Afrikaans, Afrikaners and whites known as (racist) transformation, in terms of which the university wanted to force university students against their will to share their residences with those of other population groups. There is also a deliberate campaign to expunge Afrikaans as a medium of instruction at the university, and replace it with English. Whatever happened to the students’ constitutionally guaranteed concept of freedom of association, one might ask? Why are they forced to integrate, against their will? Where is the students’ constitutional right to be taught in their mother tongue? Where is the liberal media’s outrage about the injustice the Afrikaans-speaking students are being subjected to?

As a white former university residence member, albeit at another university, I was subjected to the exact same ritual that the cleaners were jokingly subjected to. We were forced to eat mouldy bread, for example, and had molasses poured over us as an initiation ritual. The difference is in the video it was a joke, but in my case it was for real. Think what you may about initiations (which is an entirely separate issue that has much more to do with bullying than with racism) but there was no question of any racism in the Reitz video, except for the anti-white racism it was protesting against. Once again, the makers of the video in question intended their video to be satirical, and to jokingly pretend to show cleaners subjected to the same ritual that I and many other lily-white students had been subjected to over the years.

The sycophantic left-wing media, for example Talk Radio 702, insist on continuously repeating an outright lie, i.e. that the students “urinated” (sic) on the cleaners’ food. Nothing of the kind happened. How many times must it be repeated before these liberal dullards will succeed in comprehending the simple truth: it was an orange cordial known as Oros. What is so difficult to grasp, people? I am again thinking of especially Talk Radio 702, that deliberately, knowingly and repeatedly spreads this lie in its news bulletins.

In spite of the bilge spewed by those intellectual giants and experts in carpentry of the ANCYL, the so-called victims very clearly did not think that their dignity had been trodden on at the time. Had that adult prodigy Julius Malema and his equally gifted Cosatu comrades taken the trouble to view the entire video, it would have been abundantly clear that the so-called victims participated voluntarily and indeed laughingly in the video. The so-called victims even drank a beer and jokingly played rugby with their “tormentors”, and clearly had a good time in the filming of the video. Once again: nobody was hurt in any way, shape or form. Nobody’s dignity was compromised. There was no racism. Those are the facts; except the facts don’t suit the liberals or the left, do they?

Months after filming the video, the cleaners clearly thought nothing more of it. They most assuredly never even considered laying any charges, or even complaining to the authorities. How could they, given that they were filmed while drinking on duty? It was only when the demagogues of the left stumbled on the video, that the insane screams of racism started, and the cleaners were brainwashed by others into agreeing that their rights had been trampled upon. This only goes to show up the extremely patronizing attitude that especially liberals have towards blacks. It is in fact not the students who displayed a racist attitude, but the liberals and left-wingers who decided on the cleaners’ behalf that they had not acted correctly by playing along and not pressing charges. How patronizing can one get? The cleaners are adults and as such surely could decide for themselves they had no problem with the video. Others, however, took it upon themselves to force the cleaners to “admit” that they’d been harmed. How much respect do those who imposed their views on the cleaners have for the judgement of the cleaners themselves? Are those that laid the charge not in effect saying the the cleaners, being black, are incapable of making a correct decision and require the assistance of external parties to realize when they’ve been slighted?

When it was finally decided to charge the students in question, nobody was quite sure with what to charge them. Is bad taste, which is the worst that the makers of the video can be accused of, a criminal offense? The best that the prosecutions authority could come up with, was the largely irrelevant charge of crimen injuria. It is unclear how exactly this can be proved in any reasonable court of law – once again, the so-called victims were willing and laughing participants, who didn’t even consider pressing charges.

Another egregious lie that keeps being repeated by the Nazis on the left (no doubt taking their lead from Adolf Hitler who famously said that a lie that is repeated often enough is eventually mistaken for the truth) is that the Reitz students showed no remorse. According to their lawyer, the truth is that they have attempted on several occasions to do so, but were not allowed to do so. Once again, one has to ask why not. The answer, of course, remains the same: in the Nazi-like propaganda war being waged on whites, the truth and facts don’t suit the left.

While the left and liberals are screaming hysterically about a non-event, the shocking hate speech and naked anti-white bigotry of black students at universities, including the Free State university, continue unchecked. A few weeks ago, black students at Tuks embarked on a criminal orgy of violence and uttered death threats against white students who were trying to prevent the former from trashing the campus (as the more radical black students have been wont to do on multiple occasions.) On the very same campus where the Reitz video was shot, black students recently threatened to “rape the white bitches.” Yet, there is a strange silence about this ourageous black-on-white racial hate from all quarters, including the liberal mainstream media. Why is this? Why not also splash this across your front pages for months on end, rend your clothes and scream your outrage to the heavens, as you did with the Reitz video? Perhaps the liberal media also subscribes to the bullshit that blacks are not capable of racism.

I must admit that, even in spite of the demonstrable facts that I have provided above, I hold out very little hope that the truth, as opposed to anti-white and anti-Afrikaner propaganda, will win the day. The loony left and liberals clearly have no interest in the truth or the facts, and the Reitz House video is too convenient a stick with which to beat whites and especially Afrikaners. Given the political pressure, should the Reitz house case ever come before a court, they have no chance whatsoever of a fair trial. Should this trial be adjudicated by a racist black judge such as the Afro-fascist, liar and piss artist, “judge” Nkola Motata, especially, these students won’t stand a chance.

All the while, black radicals are free to spout their hatred of whites with barely a whisper being raised in the liberal media. Somebody must really explain to me one day why white students are not allowed to make a satirical video in which fun was had by all, but it’s followed by an immense and immediate outcry by especially the media. On the other hand, the liberal media clearly views the malicious destruction of university property, death threats and threats of rape against white students uttered by black students as not only not newsworthy, but quite possibly acceptable behaviour on the part of blacks.

Source: ZA Misdat

The Reitz Video....

Man Arrested by Political Police for calling Mandela a “Kaffir” in his Nkosi Sikilela remix song.....

2009-10-27T12:22:00.000-07:00

Kenneth Boulding's Population Growth Theorems (1971): "The Dismal Theorem"- If the only ultimate check on the growth of population is misery, then the population will grow until it is miserable enough to stop its growth.
"The moderately cheerful form of the Dismal Theorem" - Fortunately, it is not too difficult to restate the Dismal Theorem in a moderately cheerful form, which states that if something else, other than misery and starvation, can be found which will keep a prosperous population in check, the population does not have to grow until it is miserable and starves, and it can be stably prosperous.
Until we know more, the Cheerful Theorem remains a question mark. Misery we know will do the trick. This is the only sure-fire automatic method of bringing population to an equilibrium. The economic analysis I presented indicates that the major priority, is a world campaign for the reduction of birth rates. This, I suggest, is more important than any program of foreign aid and investments. Indeed, if it is neglected, all programs of aid and investment will be ultimately self-defeating and will simply increase the amount of human misery.
~ Reflections on Sustainability, Population Growth, and the Environment: Carrying Capacity & Denial of Population Problem ~

Man in court over offensive Madiba lyrics

Mail & Guardian

Johannesburg, South Africa
Oct 27 2009 17:59

I was rather alarmed by the number of Canadian journalists who are quite happy to serve, as eunuchs of the politically correct state. If you don't believe in free speech for people you loathe, you hate, you revile, you don't believe in free speech at all.
“Free societies should not be in the business of criminalizing opinion” -- Mark Steyn Testimony to Ontario Human Rights Commission

A man has appeared in court for allegedly insulting former president Nelson Mandela during a potjiekos competition at Sun City near Rustenburg, North West police said on Tuesday.

Benjamin Burger (46), a shareholder of the security company hosting the competition at the hotel, allegedly played a remixed version of the national anthem on Saturday, Commissioner Lesetja Beetha said in a statement.

"It is alleged that during the competition he played a CD ... containing remixed lyrics of the national anthem, and people who attended the event listened to the song Nkosi Sikelel' iAfrika, which continued to say Nelson Mandela is a kaffir."

One of the people attending the competition reported this to the hotel manager, who informed the police.

Burger -- apparently a main shareholder of the Falcon Security Company that provides security services at the Sun City hotel -- was subsequently arrested and released on bail of R1 500.

He appeared in the Mogwase District Magistrate's Court on Tuesday on a charge of crimen injuria.

The matter was postponed to December 11. -- Sapa

Source: Mail & Guardian

Ecologically-minded liberals should also heed Dr. Salter’s work, for only when Third-World populations are made to bear the consequences of their own reproductive irresponsibility will they, and the world as a whole, establish population policies that protect the environment. Closing off the “safety valve” of Third-World immigration to the West should be as attractive to the sincere left as to the racial right.

A Rustenburg man called Mandela a kaffir in his remix song and was arrested – come on now…
Times Live

Posted: October 27th, 2009
By Abdul Milazi

A police report says that a man has appeared in court for allegedly insulting former president Nelson Mandela during a Potjiekos competition at Sun City near Rustenburg, North West.

This is scary stuff, seeing that we all have constitutional rights to trade insults – or so I believed. Mandela who is ill, doesn’t even know about the incident. Doesn’t the affected party have to open a case against the insulter for the case to go to court?

This guy’s only mistake is that he decided to launch a musical career by doing a kaffir version of the South African new national anthen and then threw in Nelson Mandela’s name there just to spice things up – also to do some big name calling just as rappers do if they want their albums to sell. As they say in rap lingo “drop it like it’s hot”.

According to the police report “it is alleged that during the competition he (Benjamin Burger, 46) played a CD…containing remixed lyrics of the national anthem, and people who attended the event listened to the song Nkosi Sikelel’ iAfrika, which continued to say Nelson Mandela is a kaffir.”

Now Benjamin is no student at the University of the Free State and neither does he stay at the univeristy’s Reitz residence. He is a grown up and a shareholder of Falcon Security Company which provides security services at the Sun City hotel, which incidentally hosted the Potjiekos competition. He was playing no prank, but was merely excercising his constitutional right to freedom of expression and enjoying whatever it is that Potjiekos competition contestants do. We can’t also rule out the possibility of him trying to launch a music career.

I mean our deputy police minister Fikile Mbalula has been trading insults with Kader Asmal. Words like lunatic were tossed about, and the MK veterans jumped in and spiced it up with stronger words like “find the nearest cemetery and die”. Julius Malema and Helen Zille have enjoyed that pastime too as we sat glued to our newspapers whisky and Cubans in hand. Riverting stuff.

Malema has basically traded insults with almost everyone from Cope to DA, and does not spare his own comrades in the ANC and SACP – Naledi Pandor and Blade Nzimande will attest to that.

Now that’s democracy at its best and I love it that way.

I don’t see anything wrong with Zuma’s “mshini wam” mixed with the hit single “kill the boer, kill the farmer” by the late Peter Mokaba and a dash of Mr Burger’s kaffirnated Nkosi sikele’iAfrika. I would make for a chart burning release, akin to Arthur “king of kwaito” Mafokate’s “Don’t call me kaffir”.

In Zimbabwe I am told people get arrested for making uncomplimentary statements about uncle Bob, and sometimes for just looking like a member of the movement for democratic something. We should not head that way.

Source: Times Live

Memo Refugee Issues: [I] S.A. White Refugees & ANC’s Crime of Apartheid; [II] Pres. Obama’s 25.5 Million Nuclear Refugees Nobel Peace Prize

2009-10-21T05:13:00.001-07:00

What are we and they to understand as the connection between population and security? Population is a central element in nearly any concept of national security.
And in many regions the potential for conflict arising from simple overpopulation and starvation is large and growing. There is, of course, nothing simple about these problems; those who feel inclined to dismiss the seriousness of this potential should consider the question: "How does one say `Lebensraum' in Chinese?"
It should also be clear that solutions to the pressures created by population growth and movement, pressures that threaten the security of so many states, are beyond the means of any single state. Migration today can be controlled only by international agreement.
~ US Army War College: People Wars: Ruminations on Population and Security: How Does One Say 'Lebensraum' in Chinese? ~

Subject: Memo for Your Refugee Issues Records:

[I] S.A. White Refugees & ANC’s Crime of Apartheid;
[II] Pres. Obama’s 25.5 Million Nuclear Refugees Nobel Peace Prize

Overview of Documentation
This letter to UNHCR, has also been sent to dozens of International and National Refugee Agencies. For a list of all the Refugee Agencies, who have received the letter below, addressed directly to their agency, see DMW Zhivago Commons folder.

[I] South African White Refugees & the ANC’s Crime of Apartheid:

Please Note, For Your Records, as a National/International Refugee Issues Organisation; legal documents related to African White Refugee Issues:

Doc A: High Court, W. Cape: # 19963-09: Application for Review; with particular reference to [10] State of Effective Emergency: South Africa’s Unrepresented White Refugees, dated 23 September 2009 (www.kaffir-lily-commons.co.nr)
Doc B: SA Human Rights Commission Complaint: WC-2009-0455BS: Crimes Against Humanity, Crimes Against the Peace, and Crime of Apartheid, dated 07 October 2009 (www.crime-of-apartheid.co.nr)

The High Court Review, informs you of State of Effective Emergency: South Africa’s Unrepresented White Refugees, including related evidentiary documentation.

The SA Human Rights Committee Complaint, requests your organisation to Take Notice of the Information Provided to You; in terms of the following References:

[1] Request for UNHCR to Refer Issue: South Africa’s Unrepresented White Refugees, to UN Security Council, under Chapter VII of UN Charter; to Refer to ICC Prosecutor: Investigation.

[2] Ref: HC: WC-CT # 19963-09: [10] State of Effective Emergency: South Africa’s Unrepresented White Refugees

Both aforementioned documents, result from the original Population Policy Common Sense Criminal Trial, in the Magistrates Court of Capetown: 14/1198/08 (www.kaffir-lily-riddle.co.nr):

Definitions and Clarifications:

French Riddle of the Lily Pond:
In this riddle, the lily pond has a potentially virulent lily that apparently will double in size each day. If the lily grows unchecked it will cover the entire pond in 30 days, choking off all other forms of life in the water by the time it covers the entire pond. If a skeptic waited until 50% of the pond was covered before taking any remedial action to save the pond, when would he act? The answer: on the 29th day of the month! But by then, it would be too late. (Crypto Gandhian French Lily Pond Riddle, Justification Defence: Political Necessity (PDF[6]))

Crime of Apartheid:
In SAHRC Complaint WC-2009-0455BS: Their preference for ‘collateral damage’ slave and cannon fodder breeding as a policy to secure their own aggrandizement -- as opposed to population policy common sense human rights, peace and social justice ecological carrying capacity advocacy -- “committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups… with the intention of maintaining that regime.”? (International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid; 18 July 1976, Article XV: Art. II (PDF[7]))

Original Etymology of ‘Kaffir’:
The word kāfir is the active participle of the Semitic root K-F-R “to cover”. As a pre-Islamic term it described farmers burying seeds in the ground, covering them with soil while planting; as they till earth and “cover up” seeds; which is why earth tillers are referred to as “Kuffar.” Thus, the word kāfir implies the meaning “a person who hides or covers”; To conceal, deny, hide or cover the truth. (Decoding ‘Kaffir’: Prevailing Norms of Society, in State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument: Propositions of Law with Reference to Authorities, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF[8]))

[II] Pres. Obama’s 25.5 Million Nuclear Refugees Nobel Peace Prize

A. The Political Necessity Nuclear Coercion Commons:

B. “Nuclear Freedom is the Recognition of Mutual Coercion, Mutually Agreed Upon Procreation Values Necessity”:

[A] The Political Necessity Nuclear Coercion Commons:

1968: Overpopulation and Nuclear War:

Tragedy of the Commons[9], by Garret Hardin (www.armigideon-titanic.co.nr)

At the end of a thoughtful article on the future of nuclear war, Wiesner and York (1) concluded that: "Both sides in the arms race are ... confronted by the dilemma of steadily increasing military power and steadily decreasing national security. It is our considered professional judgment that this dilemma has no technical solution. If the great powers continue to look for solutions in the area of science and technology only, the result will be to worsen the situation."

I would like to focus your attention not on the subject of the article (national security in a nuclear world) but on the kind of conclusion they reached, namely that there is no technical solution to the problem. An implicit and almost universal assumption of discussions published in professional and semipopular scientific journals is that the problem under discussion has a technical solution. A technical solution may be defined as one that requires a change only in the techniques of the natural sciences, demanding little or nothing in the way of change in human values or ideas of morality.

……….. If each human family were dependent only on its own resources; if the children of improvident parents starved to death; if, thus, overbreeding brought its own "punishment" to the germ line-- then there would be no public interest in controlling the breeding of families. But our society is deeply committed to the welfare state (12), and hence is confronted with another aspect of the tragedy of the commons.

In a welfare state, how shall we deal with the family, the religion, the race, or the class (or indeed any distinguishable and cohesive group) that adopts overbreeding as a policy to secure its own aggrandizement (13)? To couple the concept of freedom to breed with the belief that everyone born has an equal right to the commons is to lock the world into a tragic course of action.

The most important aspect of necessity that we must now recognize, is the necessity of abandoning the commons in breeding. No technical solution can rescue us from the misery of overpopulation. Freedom to breed will bring ruin to all.

The only way we can preserve and nurture other and more precious freedoms is by relinquishing the freedom to breed, and that very soon. "Freedom is the recognition of necessity"--and it is the role of education to reveal to all the necessity of abandoning the freedom to breed. Only so, can we put an end to this aspect of the tragedy of the commons.

1974: Overpopulation: National Security Resource Wars: Immigration, Refugees, Crime, etc.

National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of World Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests[10], April 1974

NSSM 200 was the definitive interagency study of world population growth and its implications for U.S. and global security, requested by President Nixon in 1974. It concluded that sustained rapid world population growth had become a danger of the highest magnitude, calling for urgent measures to avoid severe damage to world economic, political and ecological systems, and to our humanitarian values.

Subsequently, President Ford reviewed the study and wrote recently, "I endorsed the 227 page NSSM 200 report in 1975, in National Security Decision Memorandum 314. My views are the same today."

“The President has reviewed the interagency response to NSSM 200 .... He believes that United States leadership is essential to combat population growth, to implement the World Population Plan of Action* and to advance United States security and overseas interests. The President endorses the policy recommendations contained in the Executive Summary of the NSSM 200 response...” – National Security Advisor, Brent Scowcroft

NSSM200, was to be the blueprint for a global population policy adopted by the nations attending the 1974 UN world Population Conference in Bucharest, Romania; however African countries walked out, resorting to their favourite argument, by calling it ‘racist’.

Feb 1986: Overpopulation as a root cause of Terrorism:

Public Report of the Vice Presidents Task Force on Combatting Terrorism

Arguably the most authoritative work on terrorism was the February 1986 Report of the Vice President's Task Force on Combatting Terrorism, chaired by Vice President George Bush, Sr. Yet no mention of the study has appeared in the press since September 11, 2001. On that day, the George Bush Library archivist, Melissa Walker, pulled it from her files in anticipation of interest by the media. But not until October 29th did she receive her first request. It was from CRPS. This report concludes that the root cause of terrorism is overpopulation

1995 - 96: Overpopulation & Resource Scarcity: Direct Cause of Conflict & War

Parameters, US Army War College Quarterly, United States Army Senior Professional Journal.
The Culture of Future Conflict: Overpopulation & Resource Scarcity will be the Direct Cause of Confrontation, Conflict and War[11]:

Basic resources will prove inadequate for populations exploding beyond natural limits, and we may discover truths about ourselves that we do not wish to know. In the end, the greatest challenge may be to our moral order.

Resource scarcity will be a direct cause of confrontation, conflict, and war. The struggle to maintain access to critical resources will spark local and regional conflicts that will evolve into the most frequent conventional wars of the next century.

Today, the notion of resource wars leads the Westerner to think immediately of oil, but water will be the fundamental need of some states, anti-states, and peoples. We envision a need to preserve rainforests, but expanding populations will increasingly create regional shortages of food--especially when nature turns fickle. We are entering the century of "not enough," and we will bleed for things we previously could buy.

Gross overpopulation will destroy fragile possibilities for progress in much of the non-Western world, and much of this problem is the West's fault. Our well-intentioned introduction of relatively crude concepts of sanitation and disease control, combined with our determination to respond generously to local famines, has allowed populations to explode.

2006: Overpopulation as cause of Peak Debt, Peak Oil, Peak Inflation, et al

The Population Explosion: The Most Powerful Force on Earth[12] , Money & Markets

Ultimately, the population explosion is the most persistent but least understood factor underlying virtually everything we’ve been warning you about here in Money and Markets:

It is behind food prices… It is behind the cycle of debt. I’m talking about the greatest credit inflation the world has ever seen, including $41.7 billion in U.S. interest-bearing debts, $101.5 trillion in derivative debts, tens of trillions in U.S. government commitments for Medicare and Social Security, plus trillions more in Europe, Asia, Latin America and Africa.

Sometimes you may wonder: Why are nations so committed to economic growth at nearly any cost? Why do central banks continue to pump in so much money long after they recognize the inevitability of its inflationary consequences? Why has GDP growth become the supreme icon of most governments, businesses and investors? When debts and deficits run amuck, why don’t our leaders just slow down, take a breather, and focus on finding a more stable path? Your answers may be varied. But if you trace back through the chain of cause and effect, you will always return to one single, overriding factor: The population explosion colliding with finite resources. More mouths to feed. More demand. More pressure to perpetuate growth. More inflation.

Its why millions of immigrants are pouring into Western Europe from Africa, and millions more are streaming into the United States from Latin America. Its a key reason were beginning to see environmental destruction and uncontrollable epidemics on an unprecedented scale.

2008: Overpopulation Nuclear Coercion: Mutually Agreed Procreation Values Necessity:

“Nuclear Freedom is the Recognition of Mutual Coercion, Mutually Agreed Upon Procreation Values Necessity”[14]

Buffalo Bill DMW Mutually Agreed Nuclear Coercion:

Five suitcase nukes to be activated in five different cities, on the same day. Cities to be fairly decided as follows: All cities of minimum 2.55 million inhabitants per city, -- in the Eastern Hemisphere -- names, excluding Japanese cities, to be placed in a hat. Cities to be suitcase nuked, to be drawn from the hat, by ‘Buffalo Bill DMW’, at the NSA, in the presence of Admiral William Fallon, Admiral Michael Mullen, General Anthony Zinni, and the Russian Federation Ambassador, DC; on anniversary of Bush White House’s acknowledgement of Disclosure Project.[15]

RRR Zhivago Hunter Mutually Agreed Nuclear Coercion:

A further five suitcase nukes to be activated in five different cities on the same day, as above. Remaining four cities to be fairly decided as above, from all relevant Western Hemisphere cities, the fifth being Johannesburg. Cities to be suitcase nuked, to be drawn from a hat, by ‘RRR Zhivago Hunter’, at the Kremlin, in the presence of the Kremlin High Command, and the Ambassadors of Iran, China and Pakistan, on anniversary of Tzar N’enay Nenyts Yuriatin.[16]

[B] “Nuclear Freedom is the Recognition of Mutual Coercion, Mutually Agreed Upon Procreation Values Necessity”:

22 July 2008:

Tragedy of the Commons Nuclear Coercion [2.55] National Security Population Policy Common Sense Suggestions[17] to TRC-RSA Leaders, and all Foreign High Commissioners & Ambassadors in RSA (PDF[18])

23 Feb 2009:

The Ozymandias, ‘My country Tis of Thee’ Parade: Why President Obama went to Sign Stimulus Bill in Mile High City: Denver[19], Email to Whitehouse, c/o Prince Hall Masons; CC: Pentagon & Kremlin.

06 June 2009:

Legal & Political ‘African White Refugees/Population Policy Common Sense’ Notice to Norwegian Nobel Institute[20]; CC: to Kremlin & Pentagon[21] [Ref: 2.55] (PDF[22]) (Received:PDF[23]) (www.rrrint-poker.co.nr)

23 August 2009:

MI6Whisper32 Letter to Pres. & First Lady Obama: Political Necessity of Shock Doctrine ‘Tough Love’ Population Policy Common Sense Nuclear Coercion![24] (PDF[25])

22 September 2009:

Cape Argus: US Security Alert in SA: Diplomatic Offices and Embassy Shut Down Amid Threat (PDF[27])
US embassy spokeswoman Sharon Hudson-Dean said today : “Based on information recently received by the regional security office, all US government facilities in South Africa will be closed on Tuesday, September 22, 2009”

African White Refugees High Court, Western Cape (File: 19963-09); Application for Review; Respondent Nine: Minister of Citizenship & Immigration, Canada; & Respondent Ten: Norwegian Nobel Institute[28], served on Nobel Institute, care of Royal Norwegian Consulate, Capetown (PDF[29]) (Proof of Service:PDF[30])

09 October 2009:

Norwegian Nobel Inst. award President Obama, with Nobel Peace Prize, for his “vision of, and work for, a world without nuclear weapons”.[31]

12 October 2009:

Cape Argus: ‘SA not ready’ 2010 Terror: ‘Intelligence Services woefully unprepared’[32] (PDF[33]):
The Weekend Argus reported that the US Government had closed its embassy in Pretoria and all other US government facilities for two days last month because intelligence agencies had intercepted a call from Khayelitsha to the Al-Qaeda linked Al-Shabaab extremist group in Somalia, discussing a plot to blow up American interests.

Complaint to SAHRC (WC-2009-0455BS): re: South African leaders Tragedy of the Commons Slave and Cannon Fodder Breeding Crimes of Apartheid[34]; CC: (i) International Criminal Court at The Hague: Information & Evidence Unit; and (ii) US Navy Judge Advocate General’s Office (JAG); [7 Oct: Ref: Tzar N’enay Nenyts Yuriatin (Volodya’s 2.55 Nuclear Coercion)] (PDF:Proof of Service[35]) (www.crime-of-apartheid.co.nr)

14 October 2009:

Russia Declares Official Pre-emptive Nuclear Strike Doctrine[36], Pravda.ru, 14 Oct ‘09

Nikolai Patrushev, the head of Russia’s Security Council, said in an interview with the Izvestia newspaper that Russia would consider an opportunity of using nuclear arms depending on circumstances and intentions of a potential enemy.

“In situations critical for national security, a preventive nuclear strike against the aggressor is not ruled out,” he said.

“It will be a transparent military doctrine, to let everyone know which security measures we elaborate in Russia and abroad, which goals we have and how we are going to achieve them,” Patrushev said.

“What is the greater danger - nuclear warfare or the population explosion? The latter absolutely! To bring about nuclear war, someone has to DO something; someone has to press a button. To bring about destruction by overcrowding, mass starvation, anarchy, the destruction of our most cherished values-there is no need to do anything. We need only do nothing except -- breed. And how easy it is to do nothing.”
-- Isaac Asimov

Source: DMW Zhivago Commons

13 Oct 09: Notice of Intention: Correct the Record: Withdrawal of Formal Admissions

2009-10-17T03:54:00.004-07:00

Basic resources will prove inadequate for populations exploding beyond natural limits, and we may discover truths about ourselves that we do not wish to know. In the end, the greatest challenge may be to our moral order.
Resource scarcity will be a direct cause of confrontation, conflict, and war. The struggle to maintain access to critical resources will spark local and regional conflicts that will evolve into the most frequent conventional wars of the next century. We are entering the century of "not enough," and we will bleed for things we previously could buy.
Gross overpopulation will destroy fragile possibilities for progress in much of the non-Western world, and much of this problem is the West's fault. Our well-intentioned introduction of relatively crude concepts of sanitation and disease control, combined with our determination to respond generously to local famines, has allowed populations to explode.
~ US Army War College: The Culture of Future Conflict: Overpopulation & Resource Scarcity will be the Direct Cause of Confrontation, Conflict, and War ~

NOTICE OF INTENTION: CORRECT THE RECORD: WITHDRAWAL OF FORMAL ADMISSIONS

Respondents: State: NPA-WC: Snr. Pros. Jacobs; and Hon. Patricia de Lille

Overview of Documentation:
Doc: Notice in the Capetown Magistrates Court, in Court File: 14/1198/08; State (Hon. Patricia de Lille) v. Lara Johnstone: Notice of Intention: Correct the Record: Withdraw Formal Admissions (PDF)

Applicant and Respondents: Applicant: Ms. Lara Johnstone;
Respondent: State: First Respondent: National Dir. Of Public Prosecutions (Snr. Pros. Mr. Jacobs); Second Respondent: Mrs. Patricia de Lille (Proof of Service PDF)

IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF CAPETOWN

Court File No: 14/1198/08

Lara Johnstone ****************************************************** Applicant (Defendant)

And

State
» Nat. Dir. Of Public Prosecutions[1]******************************** First Respondent
» Hon. Patricia de Lille, MP, ID **************************************Second Respondent

NOTICE OF INTENTION: CORRECT THE RECORD: WITHDRAWAL OF FORMAL ADMISSIONS
ITO § 76, 105A, 114, 140 & 219A; 220, 114 (2) & (3), 121 (a) & (b) & (6); of the Criminal Procedure Act (“CPA”); with § 24(1) of the Supreme Court Act.

Please Take Notice That:

[1] The Applicant intends making an application to this Honourable Court on 13 October, 2009; prior to Sentencing, for Orders in the following terms:
[a] An Application to Correct the Record: Withdrawal of Defendants Formal Admissions, in accordance with the Plea and Sentence Agreements, and Withdrawal there from, principles as provided for in § 76 (9)(b)(ii), of the Criminal Procedure Act, to withdraw from the Verbal Formal Admission Agreement, made with the court, during court proceedings, on 08 July 2009.

[b] The trial start de novo, in accordance with § 76 (9)(d), as a result of the Accused’s Formal Admissions withdrawal: the accused herewith waive’s her right, that such de novo trial, be tried before another presiding officer.

[c] That in such de novo trial, in accordance with § 76 (10), the Formal Admissions Agreement shall be null and void and no regard shall be had or reference made to (i) any negotiations which preceded the entering into the agreement; (ii) the agreement; or (iii) any record of the agreement in any proceedings relating thereto, unless the Accused consents to the recording of all or certain admissions made by him or her in the agreement or during the proceedings relating thereto and any admission so recorded shall stand as proof of such admission.

[d] [Alternative to [b] and [c]]: The Presiding Officer is to proceed with sentencing, as originally scheduled; however any sentence, is to be set aside, and suspended, pending the outcome of the Defendant’s Application for Leave, and Judicial Review.

[2] Defendants Withdrawal of All Formal Admissions: In terms of § 76, § 105A, § 114, § 140 & 219A; 220, 114 (2) & (3), 121 (a) & (b) & (6); of the Criminal Procedure Act (“CPA”); with § 24(1) of the Supreme Court Act; Defendant/Applicant withdraws from her Formal Admission Agreement with the court and State; including any Formal Admissions, used by the State and/or court, which were material to their findings of Guilt of the Defendant.

[3] Null and Void Formal Admissions cannot be used by courts and/or the State for findings of Guilt/Convictions and/or Sentencing:

[4] Any and All of Defendants Formal Admissions were, are, and will be, Null and Void, in absence of (i) unequivocal agreement of Defendants Formal Admission Facts, as sufficient proof of such facts; and (ii) legal sanction to invoke the Political Necessity Defence[2]:
Defendants Formal Admission Political Necessity Conditions:

[a] The only Formal Admissions the Defendant made, were Political Necessity Formal Admissions; i.e. on the condition that the Defendant be allowed to invoke the Political Necessity Defence. In the absence of court condoning such Political Necessity Defence invocation, the Formal Admissions were and are null and void.

Defendants Formal Admissions ‘Non Sub Judice Executive’ Facts:

[b] The Defendants vague Political Necessity Formal Admissions, to the State, in writing on 28 January 2009[3], and verbally to the court, on 08 July 2008, were -- paraphrased -- as follows:
On 10 July 2007 I sent Mrs. De Lille 3 SMS’s in her capacity as Non Sub Judice Executive
On 16 July 2007, I sent Mrs. De Lille 2 SMS’s in her capacity as Non Sub Judice Executive

[c] The Defendants concise, detailed and unambiguous Political Necessity Formal Admission[4] Facts, in writing, during Legal Argument proceedings, on 12 August 2009, were as follows:
At 15:23[5]; 15:32[6] and 18:32[7] hrs, on 10 July[8] 2007, I sent Mrs. De Lille three SMS’s; for the attention of: (i) Mr. Thabo Mbeki, (ii) Mr. Bulelani Ngcuka, (iii) Mr. J.S. Selebi, (iv) Mr. B.M. Skosana, (v) Mr. Nelson Mandela, and (vi) Mrs. Patricia de Lille; all care of and via the Mrs. De Lille, in her capacity of, Non Sub Judice Executive, Opposition Party[9];

Then, at 10:23 and 11:32 hrs on 16 July[10] 2007, six days later, I sent Mrs. De Lille two SMS’s; for the attention of: (i) Mr. Thabo Mbeki, (ii) Mr. Bulelani Ngcuka, (iii) Mr. J.S. Selebi, (iv) Mr. B.M. Skosana, (v) Mr. Nelson Mandela, and (vi) Mrs. Patricia de Lille; and (i) RSA Legislature; (ii) RSA Judiciary; (iii) RSA Executive Officials; all care of and via Mrs. De Lille, in her capacity of, Non Sub Judice Executive, Opposition Party[8]

[d] The implications, from the laypersons perspective of the Defendant, in terms of the crimen injuria unlawfulness ‘reasonableness’ test being: all six recipients are professional politicians, all six have similar skills and competencies, and are allegedly of same or similar ‘being black’ ethnicity; only one politician (the plaintiff) allegedly considered the SMS text messages to be ‘unlawful’; while 83%, two years later, considered them lawful.

[e] All Formal Admissions – whether vague or succinct – by the Defendant have been Political Necessity Formal Admissions; i.e. in terms of Plea Negotiation and Political Necessity Principles, the Formal Admissions were made as an “Offer of Proof/Negotiation” and were on the condition of the Defendant being allowed to invoke the Political Necessity Defence.

[f] In the absence of the Court allowing the Defendant to invoke the Political Necessity Defence, and accepting the Formal Admission Facts, as sufficient proof of such facts; any and all of the Defendants Formal Admissions, are NULL AND VOID.

[g] Null and void Formal Admissions cannot be used by the State and/or the court for Findings of Guilt / Convictions; nor should they be used for Sentencing the innocent.

[5] Just Admin. Action & Access to Information Info: Complaints filed with the South African Police Services and SA Human Rights Commission:
[a] In terms of the principles enshrined in the Promotion of National Unity & Reconciliation Act 34, 1995, Officials and citizens social contract duties & responsibilities; § 2 (4) of the Prevention and Combatting of Corrupt Activities Act of 2004, Article 6 of the London Charter, & Article 33 of the Rome Statute, of the International Criminal Court; citizens privilege and the Nuremberg Principles, the following complaints have been filed with the South African Police and South African Human Rights Commission, in this matter:

(I) South African Police Services: (i) Against P. de Lille, for Perjury Fraud, Corruption and Persecution; and (ii) NPA-WC Snr. Pros. Jacobs for complicity in actions and knowledge to obstruction of justice, persecution and corruption;

(II) South African Human Rights Commission: (i) Against Hon. Patricia de Lille, MP, ID; (ii) Mr. Thabo Mbeki, Former President; (iii) Mr. Bulelani Ngcuka, Former NPA Nat. Dir.; (iv) Mr. J.S. Selebi, Former SAPS Commissioner; (v) Mr. B.M. Skosana, Former Min. of Corrections, (vi) Mr. Nelson Mandela, Former President; (vii) Mr. Jacobs, Senior Prosecutor, NPA, Capetown; and (viii) National Prosecuting Authority, Western Cape; for: Accessory After the Fact, Complicity in Actions and Knowledge to Tragedy of the Commons Slave and Cannon Fodder Breeding (a) Crimes against Peace, (b) Crimes against Humanity, and (c) the crime of apartheid.

[B] This Notice to Respondents and the Court, is based upon the following Grounds:
[a] In terms of § 76 of the Criminal Procedure Act, Charge Sheet and Proof of Record of Criminal Case: (3) (a) The court shall keep a record of the proceedings….. (c) Where the correctness of any such record is challenged, the court in which the record is challenged may, in order to satisfy itself whether any matter was correctly recorded or not, either orally or on affidavit hear such evidence as it may deem necessary.

[b] § 105A of the Criminal Procedure Act lays down the ethical principles to be adhered to by the Prosecutor and or court in regard to procedures involving Plea and Sentence Agreements. It is the Defendants submission that the principles therein enunciated apply to any Agreement, or negotiations for a potential Agreement related to any conditional Plea (Formal Admission) Negotiations, made between Defendant and the Prosecution; and that both the Prosecution and the Defendant are free to negotiate, commit to, or withdraw from any Formal Admission / Plea agreement made, at any time. Furthermore if the Prosecutor or the Accused withdraw from the agreement, the trial shall start de novo before another presiding officer: Provided that the accused may waive his or her right to be tried before another Presiding Officer. Where a trial starts de novo the former agreement, shall be null and void and no regard or reference made to any negotiations, the agreement or any record of the agreement in any proceedings related thereto, unless the accused consents to the recording of all or certain admissions made by her in the agreement or during any proceedings relating thereto and any admission so recorded shall stand as proof of such admission.

[c] In terms of among others, § 114 of the Criminal Procedure Act, Committal by Magistrate’s court of Accused for Sentence by Regional Court After Plea of Guilty clarifies that a Magistrate has a responsibility to determine whether any admission by the Accused was correctly recorded…. Furthermore only where any admission by the accused of the recording is not disputed by the accused, shall such recording stand as proof of the fact thus admitted.

[d] In terms of among others, § 121, (6) or 140, of the Criminal Procedure Act, Plea of Guilty or Procedure where Accused Arraigned for Sentence: If the accused satisfies the court that the plea of guilty or an admission which is material to his guilt was incorrectly recorded…..

[e] In terms of § 219 A, of the Criminal Procedure Act, Admissibility of Admission by Accused: ….. where the admission is made to a magistrate and reduced to writing by him or is confirmed and reduced to writing in the presence of a magistrate, the admission shall, upon the mere production at the proceedings in question of the document in which the admission is contained- (a) be admissible in evidence against such person …….. (b) be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been voluntarily made by such person if it appears from the document in which the admission is contained that the admission was made voluntarily by such person.

[f] In terms of § 220, of the Criminal Procedure Act, Admissions, An accused or his or her legal adviser or the prosecutor may in criminal proceedings admit any fact placed in issue at such proceedings and any such admission shall be sufficient proof of such fact.

[g] In terms of § 317 of the Criminal Procedure Act, Special Entry of Irregularity or Illegality: If an accused thinks that any of the proceedings in connection with or during his trial …. are irregular or not according to law, he may, either during his trial or within a period of fourteen days after his conviction or within such extended period as may upon application on good cause be allowed, apply for a special entry to be made on the record (application for a special entry) stating in what respect the proceedings are alleged to be irregular or not according to law, and such a special entry shall, upon such application for a special entry, be made unless the court to which…. the application for a special entry is made is of the opinion that the application is not made bona fide or that it is frivolous or absurd or that the granting of the application would be an abuse of the process of the court.

[C] In the event of the objection by the State/NPA-WC, Plaintiff and/or court; the Certified Court Record is further to Reflect, the Applicant herewith provides the Respondents with the following reminders:
[a] On 28 January 2009, the Applicant delivered to the Offices of the First Respondent (State/NPA-WC), a letter For the Record: State v. Johnstone: ‘Crimen Injuria’: Incomplete Further Particulars[11].
[i] The letter provided the State with Written Request for Copies of the States Irregular and Illegal Abuse of Authority and criminal justice and court processes and procedures, namely: (i) State’s Illegal Arrest of the Defendant on 18 July 2007, without an Arrest Warrant; (ii) State’s Irregular 19 July 2007 Referral of Defendant to Forensic Psychologist, (ii) the alleged Forensic Psychologists Reports; and (iii) subsequent State Psychological Report.

[ii] The letter informed the State/NPA-WC that their Further Particulars were incomplete, for lack of a thorough investigation, regarding correspondence and telephone calls between the Plaintiff and Defendant, prior to 10 and 16 July 2007; and reminded the State of their Honourable Legal Psychological Integrity Conduct (Ethics) Principles.

[iii] The letter politely informed the State/NPA-WC that Mrs. De Lille (“the Plaintiff”) had committed perjury, not once, but three times in her written 16 July 2007 Affidavit to the SA Police; and that the Defendant was unaware of the Plaintiff’s motives, for committing perjury, but was for the time being granting her the honourable benefit of the doubt.

[iv] The letter informed the State/NPA-WC that the alleged ‘crimen injuria’ text messages, had not only been sent to the Plaintiff, but the exact same text messages had been sent to five other South African Politicians, at the same time, on the same day; none of whom have so far considered the same SMS text messages to be unlawful; i.e. crimen injuria.

[v] The letter provided the State and Plaintiff with the benefit of the doubt, that their ‘crimen injuria’ motives were honourable, i.e. in support of political necessity disclosure of AIDS Iatrogenic Origins and Population Policy Common Sense Social Contract issues.

[vi] The letter provided the State with the opportunity to allow the Plaintiff to save face if her ‘crimen injuria’ motives were less than honourable; by withdrawing the charges.

[vii] The letter informed the State of the Defendants intention to plead to Political Necessity, should the State decline to withdraw the charges, or act in terms of the information provided to the State.

[b] On 13 August 2009, the Defendant informed the State, in Request: for Impartial Records Keeping of Documentation: State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument, dated 11 August 2009[12], that had “the court accepted the full written [Legal Argument] document and its evidence into the court record” the court “would have come to a finding of Not Guilty on all five counts,” and that Legal Argument, dated 11 August 2009[13], was being held for Impartial Record Keeping Purposes by the Cape Bar: Human Rights Committee. Furthermore should the State at any time dispute the Defendants statements as to the veracity of the contents of Legal Argument, dated 11 August 2009, a member of the Cape Bar Pro Bono/Human Rights Committee submit the originals into the Court Record, as the originals of 12 August, with the Defendant, and Magistrate Louw present at the time.

[c] On 22 September 2009, the Defendant again informed the State, in Notice of Intention: Application for Leave and for Judicial Review[14] (HC-WC # 19963-09 ), of among others:
[i] The Defendant requested an order for a writ of Mandamus, or relief in the nature of Mandamus, to remedy the court a quo’s irregular Findings of Guilt, by requiring Magistrate Louw to comply with his statutory duties to allow for:

(I) An Order of Special Entry of Irregularities & Illegality (§ 317, CPA):

(a) Illegality: State’s Unlawful Arrest of Defendant on 18 July 2007: in that the Arresting Officer intentionally and wilfully Arrested Defendant without any legal valid Arrest Warrant documentation;

(b) Illegality: State’s Unlawful Detention of Defendant from 18 July 2007, to 22 August 2007; in that the Arresting Officer intentionally and wilfully knew that the Defendant was arrested, and consequently being detained, without any legal valid Arrest Warrant documentation;

(c) Irregularity: State’s Irregular Pre-Trial Obstruction of Justice, by Allegations of Defendants ‘Mental Defects’, in that the State violated the Criminal Matters Amendment Act 68 of 1998, Due Process Referral Procedures by (i) coercing Defendant to see a State Psychologist on 19 July 2007; (ii) Insinuations to Defendants Legal Representatives as to Defendants alleged ‘Mental Defects’; & (iii) releasing a deceptive report to the Media on 19 July 2007, that (a) the Defendant had been referred for Psychological Observation; (b) the Report of such Psychological Observation, was to be submitted to the court on September 22, 2009.

(II) Order for the Reinstatement and Enforcement of Political Necessity Defence Formal Admission Agreement Obligations (§ 140 & 219A; 220; CPA), with related orders:

(d) Clarification of Disputed Facts in Issue (§ 212B, CPA);

(e) Adducement of Further Evidence to Disputed Facts (§ 309B (4), CPA); and

(f) Securing Attendance of Witnesses to Disputed Facts (§ 179, CPA).

(III) [If (II) Refused, an] An Order to Correct the Record: Withdrawal of Defendants Political Necessity Defence Formal Admissions (§ 140 & 219A; 220; CPA); and

(IV) Leave to Apply to the High Court: Western Cape, for an Appeal of Conviction.

[d] Neither the State, nor the court were, or are, legally obliged to accept the Defendants Formal Admissions as sufficient proof of such facts, nor the conditions for such Formal Admissions. However, where the State refuse to (i) accept the Defendants Formal Admissions as sufficient proof of such facts, and/or (ii) accept the Political Necessity conditions attached to such Formal Admissions; the State’s refusal to accept the Defendant’s ‘Formal Admission Facts &/or Defence Offer’; renders such Formal Admissions as NULL AND VOID.

[e] Formal Admissions by the Accused, which have been rendered NULL AND VOID by the State or Court; cannot be used by the State or court to convict or sentence the Accused.

[f] Accordingly any and all potential Political Necessity Formal Admissions made by the Defendant, are null and void, as a result of the State’s refusal to accept their facts and/or conditions. Until the State is willing to honourably accept and abide by, the Political Necessity Facts and conditions, the Defendants Formal Admissions are NULL AND VOID.

[g] NULL AND VOID Formal Admissions cannot be used for Findings of Guilt, &/or Sentencing.

[D] Material & Relevant Documents to This Notice / Application:
The following, is a schedule of documents that are material and relevant to this application, should Respondents have forgotten or misplaced any of the referred to documentation, or doubt the Applicants integrity; and are submitted, for paper and financial saving purposes, with links to where they may be downloaded online: Annexure:

(aa) Legal Argument: Facts Not In Dispute: Written Formal Admissions (PDF:43K[16])

(bb) Request to Cape Bar for Impartial Record Keeping of Legal Argument (PDF:1154K[17])

(cc) Notice of Intention: Application for Leave and for Judicial Review (PDF:7979K[18])

(dd) Affid.Lara Johnstone: Proof of Service: Notice of Intention: Judicial Review (PDF:3246K[19])

(ee) SAPS Complaint: Mrs. P. De Lille: Perjury, Fraud & Persecution (PDF:57K[20])

(ff) SAPS Complaint: Snr. Pros. Jacobs: Obstruction of Justice, Corruption (PDF:68K[21])

(gg) SAHRC Complaint: Crimes Against Peace, Humanity & Crime of Apartheid (PDF:54K[22])

(hh) SAHRC Indictment & Affidavit: Crimes Against Humanity & Crime of Apartheid (PDF:255K[23])

[E] Proof of Service Affidavit:
The following Proof of Service Affidavit will be used in support of this Notice: Annexure:

(jj) Affidavit of Lara Johnstone in Support of Proof of Service of Notice of Intention: Correct the Record: Withrawal of Formal Admissions.

Dated at George, Southern Cape, South Africa, on this day, the 7th of October, 2009

[SIGNED]
Lara Johnstone, Pro Se Applicant
Per: 16 Taaibos Avenue
Heatherpark, George, 6529
Tel: (044) 870 7239

TO:
CLERK OF THE MAGISTRATES COURT
Magistrates Court: Capetown
Capetown

AND TO:
MAGISTRATE LOUW
Capetown Magistrates Court

AND TO:
FIRST RESPONDENT:
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS:
Senior Prosecutor Mr. Jacobs
Senior Prosecutor’s Office
Capetown Magistrates Court

AND TO:
SECOND RESPONDENT:
HON. MRS. PATRICIA DE LILLE
Senior Prosecutor Mr. Jacobs
Senior Prosecutor’s Office
Capetown Magistrates Court

AND TO:
[Impartial Record Keeping Purposes]
Adv. Anton Katz
Cape Bar: Human Rights Committee
56 Keerom St., Chambers, Capetown

Source: Notice of Intention: Correct Record: Withdraw Formal Admissions (PDF)
Proof of Service: Correct Record: Withdraw Formal Admissions (PDF)

12 Oct '09: SAHRC Complaint: # WC-2009-0455BS: De Lille, Mandela, Mbeki et al; Crimes Against Humanity & Peace & Crime of Apartheid

2009-10-17T03:54:00.003-07:00

“... World population growth is widely recognized within the Government as a current danger of the highest magnitude calling for urgent measures.......”
“... population factors are indeed critical in, and often determinants of, violent conflict in developing areas. Segmental (religious, social, racial) differences, migration, rapid population growth, differential levels of knowledge and skills, rural/urban differences, population pressure and the spatial location of population in relation to resources -- in this rough order of importance -- all appear to be important contributions to conflict and violence... Clearly, conflicts which are regarded in primarily political terms often have demographic roots. Recognition of these relationships appears crucial to any understanding or prevention of such hostilities.”
“...there is general agreement that up to the point when cost per acceptor rises rapidly, family planning expenditures are generally considered the best investment a country can make in its own future.”
~ National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth ~

South African Human Rights Commission Complaint: WC-2009-0455BS

Accessory After the Fact, Complicity in Actions and Knowledge to Tragedy of the Commons Slave and Cannon Fodder Breeding (a) Crimes against Peace, (b) Crimes against Humanity, (c) Crime of Apartheid

(i) Hon. Patricia de Lille, MP, ID; (ii) Mr. Thabo Mbeki, Former President; (iii) Mr. Bulelani Ngcuka, Former NPA Nat. Dir.; (iv) Mr. J.S. Selebi, Former SAPS Commissioner; (v) Mr. B.M. Skosana, Former Min. of Corrections, (vi) Mr. Nelson Mandela, Former President; (vii) Mr. Jacobs, Senior Prosecutor, NPA, Capetown; and (viii) National Prosecuting Authority, Western Cape

7 October 2009 ****************************************************Ref: Tzar N'enay Nenyts Yuriatin

TO:
Head: Danaline Franzman
South African Human Rights Commission
c/o Ms. Penny Carelse (pcarelse@sahrc.org.za)
7th Floor ABSA Building, 132 Adderley St., Capetown
P O Box 3563, Capetown 8001
Tel: (021) 426 2277 | Fax: (021) 426 2875

Ref: Human Rights Complaint

AND TO:
Complaints Registrar
Sebongile Mutlwane
Tel: (011) 484 8300 ext 2113
Fax: (011) 484 1360
Per: E-mail: smutlwane@sahrc.org.za

Ref: Human Rights Complaint

CC:
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees[1]
European Council on Refugees & Exiles (ECRE)
Amnesty International: Refugee & Migrant Rights' Team
Jesuit Refugee Service: Europe
Churches' Commission for Migrants in Europe (CCME)
ICMC (International Catholic Migration Commission)
Refugee Councils for Australia, Canada, Scotland, etc
Minority Rights Group International, etc.

Ref: Request for UNHCR to Refer Issue: South Africa’s Unrepresented White Refugees[2], to UN Security Council, under Chapter VII of UN Charter; to Refer to ICC Prosecutor: Investigation.

Ref: HC: WC-CT # 19963-09: [10] State of Effective Emergency: South Africa’s Unrepresented White Refugees

CC:
International Criminal Court
Information and Evidence Unit
Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Luis Moreno - Ocampo
PO Box 19519, 2500 CM The Hague, Netherlands.
Email: otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int
Facsimile: + 31 70 515 8555

Ref: Claim under Article 15 of the Rome Statute of the Int’l Criminal Court, for the initiation of investigation proprio motu: information on crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court.

CC:
Deputy Judge Advocate General
Commander, Naval Legal Service Command
US Navy Judge Advocate General’s Office
1322 Patterson Avenue, Suite 3000
Washington Navy Yard, DC, 20374-5066, USA

Ref: HC-CPD Appeal A 696-04, (aka JAG 07-146: transparent safe record keeping), dated 07/07/07[3]: RSA: Official Notice: Elimination of Plausible Deniability: “AIDS is a ‘Black’ Depopulation Virus”

Ref: 2.55M ICC Caviar Justice & TRC Hypocrisy

South African Human Rights Commission Complaint Form

Full Name:
Lara Johnstone (Married:Johnson)

Email:
wake-up-whitey[at]pravda.ru

ID Number:
XXXXXX XXXX XXX

Race:
European / ‘White’

Gender:
Female

Language:
English

Problem Date:
28 April 2002 to 23 September 2009, and ongoing.

Place:
Capetown, Western Cape; George Southern Cape; South Africa

Rights:
Life, Liberty, Freedom & Security of Persons, Freedom of Religion, Belief & Opinion; Access to Information, Just Administrative Action, Access to Courts, Arrested & Detained Persons, Freedom of Expression

Violators:
(i) Hon. Patricia de Lille, MP, ID; (ii) Mr. Thabo Mbeki, Former President; (iii) Mr. Bulelani Ngcuka, Former NPA Nat. Dir.; (iv) Mr. J.S. Selebi, Former SAPS Commissioner; (v) Mr. B.M. Skosana, Former Min. of Corrections, (vi) Mr. Nelson Mandela, Former President; (vii) Mr. Jacobs, Senior Prosecutor, NPA, Capetown; and (viii) National Prosecuting Authority, Western Cape

Details of Complaint:
Please see Attached (also available as PDF for download):
(A.01) Indictment: (i) Hon. Patricia de Lille, MP, ID; (ii) Mr. Thabo Mbeki, Former President; (iii) Mr. Bulelani Ngcuka, Former NPA Nat. Dir.; (iv) Mr. J.S. Selebi, Former SAPS Commissioner; (v) Mr. B.M. Skosana, Former Min. of Corrections, (vi) Mr. Nelson Mandela, Former President; (vii) Mr. Jacobs, Senior Prosecutor, NPA-WC: Capetown; and (viii) National Prosecuting Authority: Western Cape; for: Accessory After the Fact[4], Complicity in Actions and Knowledge1 to Tragedy of the Commons1 Slave and Cannon Fodder Breeding1 (a) Crimes against Peace1, (b) Crimes against Humanity1, (c) Crime of Apartheid1; by breaching their Promotion of National Unity & Reconciliation Act 34, 1995, social contract1 duties & responsibilities; violating § 2 (4) of the Prevention and Combatting of Corrupt Activities Act of 2004, Article 6 of the London Charter1, & Article 6, 7, 33(2) 1 of the Rome Statute, of the International Criminal Court: (PDF:255K[5])

(A.02) Affidavit of Lara Johnstone In Support of Indictment. (PDF:255K[5])

(B) Affidavit of Leonard G. Horowitz evidencing Iatrogenic Origins of AIDS (PDF:314K[6]/4372K[7])

(C) Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D. evidencing ‘citizens privilege’ Nuremberg Principles of Civil Disobedience. (PDF:128K[8]/6852K[9])

Religious Group:
Radical Hon(our)sty Futilitarian Church (www.radicalhonesty.com)

Age & Social Status:
42 & Unpaid Work / Home / Community

Profession:
Radical Hon(our)sty Human / Small Vermicompost Business

Level of Education:
Tertiary (Paralegal Diploma & Certificate)

Citizenship:
Allegedly a RSA Citizen, but Effectively a White Refugee in Africa

Impairment & Literacy:
None & Literate

Use of My Name:
Yes, you may use my name in news reports, or letters to me.

SIGNED
________________________________________
COMPLAINANT: LARA JOHNSTONE

Source: SAHRC Complaint: DeLille, Mandela, Mbeki, et al: Crimes Against Humanity, (AckRecSign&Sticker)(PDF)
Also delivered to Capetown Magistrates Court: Court File 14/1198/08 (State v. Lara Johnstone); as Annexure GG, to Notice of Intention: Correct the Record: Withdrawal of Formal Admissions (PDF) [Proof of Service (PDF)]

Obama’s H1N1 Swine Flu “National Emergency”: Evidences Vaccine Market-Building for Mass Murder

2009-10-17T03:54:00.001-07:00

French Riddle of the Lily Pond: In this riddle, the lily pond has a potentially virulent lily that apparently will double in size each day. If the lily grows unchecked it will cover the entire pond in 30 days, choking off all other forms of life in the water by the time it covers the entire pond. If a skeptic waited until 50% of the pond was covered before taking any remedial action to save the pond, when would he act? The answer: on the 29th day of the month! But by then, it would be too late.
~ Revisiting The Limits to Growth: Could The Club of Rome Have Been Correct, After All?, Matthew Simmons; CEO - Simmons & Co. Intnl ~
“Karl Marx had it wrong. Class has, been a major factor in history; but class itself is a derivative concept that is based on the ultimate causative power in history: sex. Control -- or the claim of control -- over the means of reproduction has been even more fundamental to history than has control of the means of production.”
~ Eve's Seed: Biology, the Sexes and the Course of History ~

Obama’s H1N1 Swine Flu “National Emergency”: Evidences Vaccine Market-Building for Mass Murder

by Leonard Horowitz and Sherri Kane

November 2, 2009
Pal Telegraph | Nov 2, 2009

US, November 2, 2009, (Pal Telegraph) – Los Angeles–President Obama’s declared H1N1 emergency cannot be reconciled by either vaccine shortages or flu cases; only by medical “market-building,” vaccination intoxications, and mass murder for population reduction says common sense and mounting evidence. Over the weekend, initial reports from Reuters News Service and Fox News stated that the President’s declaration was intended to prepare the country in case of “a rapid increase in illness that may overburden health care resources.” The media quoted an unidentified administration official saying, “It’s important to note that this is a proactive measure — not a response to a new development.” This action was “similar to disaster declarations issued before hurricanes hit coastal areas,” Reuters reported.

Why would the Obama administration anticipate an H1N1 “hurricane” to hit when Purdue researchers concluded last week the epidemic was expected to peak this week? In fact, too soon for vaccines to be helpful.

Thus, most people getting vaccinated now risk side effects for NOTHING–no benefit what-so-ever!

Furthermore, CBS News determined last week the CDC’s reported H1N1 cases had been overblown up to 97 percent. Only about 1,000 people have died of H1N1 since April’s Mexican outbreak. That is merely 1/18th, or less than 6%, of expected deaths from a normal seasonal flu during the same time period.

It is highly suspicious that David A. Paterson, New York State’s Governor, suddenly suspended “mandatory” H1N1 shots for health professionals citing vaccine shortages, not litigation exposures, as cause for the policy change.

Neglecting notice that more than 60 percent of nurses in New York State refused to take the H1N1 vaccines according to polls, and unions had filed lawsuits against New York and Washington State to gain injunctions against mandated injections, Paterson’s yellow press blamed “limited vaccine supplies” as reason to inject pregnant women and children exclusively. Only two weeks earlier, New York State officials posted their first priority, “as established by the CDC,” to vaccinate health care workers and emergency medical services personnel.

Oddly, all this talk about sudden vaccine shortages being the cause of a federal emergency grossly contradicts what many health officials were saying merely three weeks ago. United Press International (UPI) reported, for instance, Dr. Judy Monroe, Indiana’s state health commissioner, said that an ample supply of the vaccine would be available for everyone by mid-October. Now, suddenly, there is an alleged shortage that compels mixed messages and general confusion.

Revelations of the Swine Flu and Forced Vaccinations

“Shortage Marketing” Disease and Death

“This is called “shortage marketing,” Dr. Leonard Horowitz explains. “It is an increasing trend in the industrial world to get consumers to purchase products that are unappealing, over-inventoried, or scarce.”

For weeks preceding Obama’s declaration of national emergency polls showed the vast majority of Americans, including health care workers, rejecting the seasonal and H1N1 flu vaccines. So with stockpiles high, despite allegations of manufacturing delays, the government’s promotions and policy changes simply reflect “shortage marketing.”

But this is a “superficial concern” according to Dr. Horowitz, who references neurobehavioral and neurocognitive disorders demonstrated in vaccine recipients who were normal before getting vaccinated. He credits the brilliant work of Andrew Moulden, MD, PhD, photographically detailing tremendous physical damage occurring following vaccinations. These previously unknown and unseen subtle changes in nerve function and physical appearance is now demonstrated in pictures by Dr. Moulden that are irrefutable in courts and the scientific world.

Dr. Horowitz, a Harvard-trained expert in behavioral science, media persuasion and public health education, has spent 20 years documenting drug industrialists’ and health officials’ criminal actions.

“The only way to reconcile President Obama’s declaration of emergency, given the increasing risks of vaccine injuries, post-peak diminishing risks of H1N1, and the anticipated public health nightmare caused by live viruses “shedding” from those vaccinated to unvaccinated persons, is to follow the flow of money,” Dr. Horowitz says. “In the process of shedding vaccination H1N1, the highly unstable shed virus is expected to pick up more lethal genes from other circulating viruses, including possibly H5N1 that kills nearly 60 percent of those infected.”

Dr. Horowitz notes that authorities have been mum on the triple recombinant H1N1 produced in labs for use in the “active” vaccine. Experts know this is highly unstable, because it is a man-made laboratory creation that did not evolve naturally over the millennia. This unstable mutant more readily recombines with other circulating viruses when it is shed for up to 3 weeks, thus exposing non-vaccinated people who are infected with other viruses.

This is the best explanation for Obama’s anticipated “hurricane,” explains Dr. Horowitz, who criticizes the mainstream media for completely neglecting this greatest risk while falsely reporting vaccine “shortages.” Something else is obviously happening behind the scenes that only seasoned investigators can discern, he says.

He diagnoses the alleged vaccine shortage as a profitable ploy used by those “who have outrageously obvious connections to the Population Council, the preeminent organization directing global depopulation, as encouraged by Obama’s science czar, John Holdren.

Dr. Holdren is the co-author of the 1977 book, Ecoscience, which calls for massive global depopulation using sterilizing vaccinations.

Dr. Horowitz points to the fact that Nonoxynol-9, a spermicidal drug causing spontaneous abortions in pregnant women, and birth defects in infants, is one of the many new “adjuvants” banned in the United States, but used by the American-based Baxter Company in their H1N1 flu vaccines stockpiled by European nations.

H1N1 Flu A Pharmaceutical Hoax

“Just get yer damn vaccine!”

Outrageous Conflicting Interests

Dr. Horowitz also suggests discerning conflicting interests between vaccine makers and the news sources that break the federal government’s announcements, in this case Reuters and FOX news.

Reuters is directed by Thomas H. Glocer, a Merck & Co. director making money from H1N1 vaccine sales through Merck’s subsidiary, CSL, Inc. Merck also sells Pneumovax, a vaccine suggested for use at the time influenza vaccines are given, yet contraindicated in people with active influenza infections.*

A “live” H1N1 vaccine infects those vaccinated with “active” viruses. Thus, Merck’s suggested Pneumovax usage is contraindicated according to their own package insert!

If that’s not bad enough, CSL, Inc. did its H1N1 vaccine safety testing on pregnant women, infants, and children at facilities financed by Rupert Murdoch and his family–the Royal Victoria Women’s Hospital directed by Elisabeth Murdoch, and the Murdoch Children’s Research Institute overseen by Rupert’s daughter-in-law Susan Murdoch. So much for FOX News’s impartiality.

The Wall Street Journal that announced “New York Ends Flu Shot Mandate for Health Care Workers” on October 23rd, is disqualified by way of its links to Merck also. . . . WSJ CEO Councilman, David Brennan, directs the AstraZeneca’s Flumist manufacturer, Medimmune, Inc. AstraZeneca drafted Brennan from Merck & Company, and appointed him CEO in 2006.

This pattern of gross conflicting interests, and coordinated multi-media genocidal counterintelligence, expands with reading Thomas Glocer’s article wherein Reuters plugs “an experimental new drug called peramivir, made by Biocryst Pharmaceuticals Inc.”**

Peramivir is produced by Jon P. Stonehouse’s BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. President and Chief Executive Officer, Stonehouse recently served as Senior Vice President of Corporate Development at (surprise, surprise) Merck. At Merck, Stonehouse was responsible for “leading strategic developments . . . [that] significantly changed the company,” according to BioCryst’s website.

The Partnership for New York City and Council for Depopulation

It is obvious that our H1N1 “intelligence” is being gathered and broadcast from the highest levels of the medical-media’s mafia. As previously reported in Dr. Horowitz’s “AFFIDAVIT,” submitted to the FBI earlier this month, and filed last week in a lawsuit against federal officials in Washington State, David Rockefeller, Rupert Murdoch, Thomas Glocer, and other media moguls are partnered in the world’s most powerful drug ring and biotechnology consortium. Its members include the government of New York State as well as the US Federal Government. Proof of these facts are available for inspection online at The Partnership for New York City (PFNYC). The site provides its members list and related pharmaceutical industry activities.

The Founder of PFNYC, David Rockefeller, wields tremendous influence over many of the foundations and institutions that direct the US Federal Government’s policies and practices. American “health care reform” is currently directed, on behalf of the Democratic party, by Sen. Jay Rockefeller.

The Rockefeller Brothers Fund granted millions of dollars to the Population Council of the City of New York during its formative years. Rockefeller family members founded this Population Council, according to The Rockefeller Archive Center. The organization currently advances globally as the world’s premier depopulation advocacy group. The US Federal Government and private institutions fund the Population Council at this time.

Doctor Oz Advises Kids To Get H1N1 Shot But Not His Own

Summary and Conclusion

“Biopreparedness” for the 2009 H1N1 Swine Flu is all about mind manipulation and vaccination for population reduction.

In the past week, the swine flu situation went from near ending to causing a “National Emergency.” People, aware of the dangers of H1N1 vaccinations, opted out and gained precedent-setting federal court prohibitions on mandatory vaccinations. CBS declared the numbers of H1N1 cases fraudulently overstated by the CDC, and additional lawsuits were filed exposing State and Federal officials for genocidal malfeasance.

Rather than admitting disgrace, government spin doctors integrated vaccine “shortage marketing” as a distraction for public consumption. New York State Health Commissioner, Richard F. Daines, who said only a week ago that health workers must be vaccinated for the seasonal flu and the H1N1 virus, or risk discipline, said that scarce vaccines would be given exclusively to pregnant women and children.

Ironically, US Health and Human Services Secretary, Kathleen Sebelius, pledged 10 percent of vaccines would be donated to other countries.

All of this preceded Barack Obama’s declaration of “National Emergency,” thus, exercising Executive power to implement The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act affecting most of the 50 States.

Obviously, none of this makes much sense unless you examine the fundamental and overriding intoxication and depopulation agendas, and what the media moguls know that few commoners learn: the H1N1 vaccines contain “live” viruses that are highly unstable. As laboratory “reverse engineered” genetically spliced germs, they are expected to recombine with more deadly viruses, possibly H5N1, by January, 2010. These new strains, circulating the globe, are projected to kill nearly 3 billion people. This Lex Lutheresque evil is obviously orchestrated by David Rockefeller’s family and friends that control vaccine manufacturing, “health care reform,” mass media persuasion, and global depopulation industries.

Like it or not, you are advised to prepare for the worst.

by Leonard Horowitz and Sherri Kane

Source: Aftermath News :: PAL Telegraph

Joshe Moshe (MOSSAD Microbiologist): “Swine flu vaccine is bioweapon”

2009-10-15T11:58:00.001-07:00

Today, 6.5 billion humans depend entirely on oil for food, energy, plastics & chemicals. Population growth is on a collision course with the inevitable decline in oil production.
To advocate for human rights, peace, and social justice while ignoring their necessary ecological basis --— a stable human population – at, or slightly less than – the eco-systems long term carrying capacity --- is intellectual dishonesty and hypocrisy.
The longer we put off choosing the nicer methods of achieving demographic stability, the more likely the nasty ones become, whether imposed by nature or by some fascistic regime. Urine Good Company might represent a mild version of what could actually be in store if we let the marketplace, corporations, and secretive, militaristic governments come up with eugenic solutions to our population dilemma.
~ Population, Resources, and Human Idealism, Energy Bulletin | Population Growth: Most Powerful Force on Earth, Money&Markets ~

Joseph Moshe (MOSSAD Microbiologist):

“Swine flu vaccine is bioweapon”

Friday, August 21, 2009

Joseph Moshe, MOSSAD

Today, the MSM are not talking about this case any more. Yesterday, they wanted us to believe that Joseph Moshe was a nutcase and a terrorist, arrested for threatening to bomb the White House. Interesting detail about his arrest (the “Westwood standoff”) was that he seemed to be immune to the 5 cans of tear gas and 5 gallons of law-enforcement grade pepper spray they pumped into his face. He very calmly remained in his car, as the video footage of his arrest shows.

Professor Moshe had called into a live radio show by Dr. A. True Ott, broadcast on Republic Broadcasting claiming to be a microbiologist who wanted to supply evidence to a States Attorney regarding tainted H1N1 Swine flu vaccines being produced by Baxter BioPharma Solutions. He said that Baxter’s Ukrainian lab was in fact producing a bioweapon disguised as a vaccine. He claimed that the vaccine contained an adjuvant (additive) designed to weaken the immune system, and replicated RNA from the virus responsible for the 1918 pandemic Spanish flu, causing global sickness and mass death.

Sources tell us that Bar-Joseph Moshe made no threat against the President or the White House. He did not mention any bomb or attack. He then proceeded to inform the White House he intended to go public with this information. When he noticed men in suits in front of his house and feared that the FBI was about to detain him, he packed some belongings into his car and, him being a dual Israeli citizen, tried to reach the Israeli consulate located in close proximity to the federal building where the standoff took place. The FBI and the bomb squad prevented him from reaching it. Who is this man? His profile on biomedexperts.com says he is a plant disease expert with many publications on his name involving the genetic manipulation of virii. Photographic evidence that Moshe is who he says he is can be found here.

Joseph Moshe was soon after his arrest sent or let go to Israel. Nothing has been heard from him since. The Secret Service was not the agency involved in the surveillance of Moshe at his home in California. This was done by the FBI, who had orders to detain or arrest him. Mounted on top of a large black vehicle used in his arrest was a microwave weapon that possibly damaged the electronics in Moshe’s car as well as any communication devices he had which might have been used to contact the media or others who could help him.

Moshe did not suffer the same effects of the gas and pepper spray that others would have because he had built up an immunity to such weapons as a by-product of his Mossad training. Moshe was not handcuffed because he was not placed under arrest.

Does this sound like an insane conspiracy theory? Sure it does. Due to the scarcity and anonimity of the sources we would dismiss it as exactly that, if it weren’t for some uncomfortable facts: Baxter Pharmaceutical has been caught, red-handed, in spreading a live, genetically engineered H5N1 Bird flu vaccine as a lethal biological weapon all over the world, destined to be used for human vaccinations. This happened just a few months ago. And only luck prevented a global catastrophe of epic proportions.

Baxter International Inc. had mixed live, genetically engineered avian flue viruses in vaccine material shipped to 18 countries. Only by sheer luck, a Czech laboratory decided to test the vaccine on a dozen ferrets, which all died in days. The World Health Organization was notified and catastrophe was averted. This was clearly a deliberate act on Baxter’s part, because they adhere to BS3, bio-safety level three. Baxter admitted a “mistake”. Such monumental screwups are totally impossible at that level. Many safety systems would have needed to be sabotaged, many key personell would have needed to be bribed. It simply can’t be done without direction from the inside. They did not send out the wrong vial – they produced dozens of gallons of biological-weapon agent (genetically engineered live H5N1 / Bird flu virus), then sent it out as a “vaccine”.

Baxter knew full well that their vaccine was lethal, because the year before they had tested it on a few hundred homeless Polish people – dozens died as a result.

Where’s the meat? Well – Baxter is now being sued for the deliberate, repeated contamination of vaccines with biological weapons designed – by them – to mass-murder people. Here is the complaint (PDF). By some kook nutcase? Not likely – Jane Burgermeister is an experienced, respected journalist. She is not the only one suing Baxter for planning and executing a plan for global genocide: Other are filing complaints as well. Read a well-researched complaint here (PDF).

Motive? The latter complaint alludes to it. Have you heard of the Georgia Guidestones? An enormous monument loaded with Masonic symbolism costing millions of dollars, it has been erected by unknown, powerful elites (multimillionaires with the clout to erect monuments wherever they please, obviously) around 30 years ago. It gives an “alternative ten commandments”, of which the first is the extermination of six and a half billion people from the face of the Earth. Half a billion will remain. This is the number of people the planet can sustain indefinitely, so that the descendents of the Rothschilds and Rockefellers can live in peace and affluence indefinitely. Slaves are needed to produce that luxury, but 500 million will do just fine. But how does one go about killing off most of the world?

“Vaccinating” the planet with a bioweapon with near-100% mortality would do the trick. Baxter would provide both the bioweapon as well as the vaccine against it to “civilized” Western peoples. Result: We can plunder Africa, we have no more competition from SE Asia, the oil is for our taking and only Western and perhaps Chinese sheeple remain.

Rockefeller said this in 1994 at a U.N. dinner: “We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis, and the nations will accept the New World Order.” PNAC said something similar right before 9/11.

Source: UnFictional
Related: Distribution of Live Contaminated Vaccines :: Depopulation of a Planet :: The Killing Times Are Here :: Nobel Winner Supported BioWar Depopulation Plan

[Д♠][Population Security] Nobel winner supported biological warfare as form of population control

2009-10-14T09:35:00.000-07:00

What are we and they to understand as the connection between population and security? Population is a central element in nearly any concept of national security.
And in many regions the potential for conflict arising from simple overpopulation and starvation is large and growing. There is, of course, nothing simple about these problems; those who feel inclined to dismiss the seriousness of this potential should consider the question: "How does one say `Lebensraum' in Chinese?"
It should also be clear that solutions to the pressures created by population growth and movement, pressures that threaten the security of so many states, are beyond the means of any single state. Migration today can be controlled only by international agreement.
~ US Army War College: People Wars: Ruminations on Population and Security: How Does One Say 'Lebensraum' in Chinese? ~

Nobel winner supported biological warfare as form of population control

Third World de-population has been U.S. strategic policy since '74

Top-secret files recently declassified from the National Archives of Australia, despite government opposition, has revealed that one of the fathers of modern biotechnology and genetic engineering advocated using biological weapons against Indonesia and other "overpopulated" countries of South-East Asia. Australia's The Age reports that world-famous microbiologist Sir Macfarlane Burnet recommended in a secret report for the Australian Defence Department in 1947 that biological and chemical weapons should be developed to target food crops and spread infectious diseases.

Macfarlane, who won the Nobel Prize for medicine in 1960 and died in 1985, said, "Specifically to the Australian situation, the most effective counter-offensive to threatened invasion by overpopulated Asiatic countries would be directed towards the destruction by biological or chemical means of tropical food crops and the dissemination of infectious disease capable of spreading in tropical, but not under Australian, conditions."

Before a government committee in 1948, Macfarlane said, "In a country of low sanitation the introduction of an exotic intestinal pathogen, e.g. by water contamination, might initiate widespread dissemination." He advised that, "Introduction of yellow fever into a country with appropriate mosquito vectors might build up into a disabling epidemic before control measures were established." The committee recommended that "the possibilities of an attack on the food supplies of S-E Asia and Indonesia using biowarfare agents should be considered by a small study group".

Outlining the benefits of the population elimination program, Macfarlane said, "Its use has the tremendous advantage of not destroying the enemy's industrial potential, which can then be taken over intact." While the idea of depopulation by chemical means for strategic purposes may seem outrageous, other strategic de-population policies are currently being practised throughout the world under the cover of population control.

The official policy of the U.S. regarding population control in foreign policy is spelled out in U.S. National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200), written by Henry Kissinger. NSSM 200, subtitled "Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests," warned that increasing populations in developing countries threatened U.S. strategic, economic, and military interests. It suggested that competition from new world powers would rise when developing nations had sufficient populations to utilize their national resources to their full potential.

Thus in order to ensure U.S. strategic, economic, and military interest, at the expense of developing countries, it proposed population control to address potential population growth and specifically targeted 13 countries whose growing populations suggested coming power. The report spelled out a plan to bring about "a two-child family on the average" throughout the world "by about the year 2000." Interestingly, NSSM 200 went into detail about avoiding U.S. responsibility for population-control programs by ensuring that the UN and international financial institutions such as the IMF and World Bank adopt population-control policies as prerequisites to their giving of aid. The report suggested furthering the camouflage by mandating that countries accepting aid from the UN or the banks form their own population-control ministries.

NSSM 200 also noted that the U.S. government played "an important role in establishing the United Nations Fund for Population Activities to spearhead a multilateral effort in population as a complement to the bilateral actions of AID and other donor countries." It added that "with a greater commitment of bank resources and improved consultation with AID and UNFPA, a much greater dent could be made on the oveerall problem." Moreover, the report asserts that "mandatory programs may be needed and that we should be considering these possibilities now."

It remains to be seen whether the Bush administration will be the first since 1974 to officially repudiate the official U.S. government policy to reduce Third World population.

Source: The Interim. See also: National Security Study Memorandum 200 & Population Security

Prospects for the white tribe: the future of the Afrikaner people in South Africa, by Dan Roodt, PRAAG

2009-10-13T15:14:00.003-07:00

What are we and they to understand as the connection between population and security? Population is a central element in nearly any concept of national security.
And in many regions the potential for conflict arising from simple overpopulation and starvation is large and growing. There is, of course, nothing simple about these problems; those who feel inclined to dismiss the seriousness of this potential should consider the question: "How does one say `Lebensraum' in Chinese?"
It should also be clear that solutions to the pressures created by population growth and movement, pressures that threaten the security of so many states, are beyond the means of any single state. Migration today can be controlled only by international agreement.
~ US Army War College: People Wars: Ruminations on Population and Security: How Does One Say 'Lebensraum' in Chinese? ~

Prospects for the white tribe:

The future of the Afrikaner people in South Africa

by Dan Roodt

Talk presented to the American Renaissance conference in the Hyatt Dulles Hotel, near Washington on 25 February 2006

This cover from Time in 1977 first designated the Afrikaner people as a “white tribe”

I was given the opportunity to change the title of this topic but I have preferred not to, even though I do not think that South African whites in general or the Afrikaner people in particular are a tribe. Rather, as I have suggested in my essay published in American Renaissance in May/June 2004, which was reprinted in my book The Scourge of the ANC, Afrikaners are a "cultural nation of the European type": "During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, they went through a great Romantic movement, a flowering of literature, translations, music and historical reflection that bound them into (such a nation)."

However, upon accepting the challenge of this topic, I was presented with one further dilemma: what to wear. These days in South Africa, the motley collection of people occupying the beautiful Cape Dutch building in Cape Town that used to be our Parliament often arrive in tribal dress for the annual opening, brandishing clubs and spears. We call these knobkieries and assegais. In coming to talk to you about our “tribe”, I would therefore also have to appear in tribal dress. What does Afrikaner tribal dress look like? After thinking about it long and hard, I have decided that I should at least wear a three-piece suit. As you can see, I have also consulted my local witch-doctor who has furnished me with charms called cuff-links to protect me from the bad spirits at this conference.

The Union Building in Pretoria, seat of government, now occupied by the Xhosa tribe

Nowadays on the internet one may look on a site such as Google Earth at satellite images of various monuments in the world: the Eiffel Tower, London Bridge, Manhattan Island, as well as our seat of government, the Union Building in Pretoria. Not so long ago I spent a whole day in Pretoria with a magazine photographer who was taking pictures of me, one of those faintly embarassing moments when I as a grey-haired middle-aged male have to pose like a nubile female model of twenty. The photographer concerned was of a certain type: equally middle-aged but dressed like a teenager and professing what she thought were artistic views on politics, a kind of predictable liberalism in the American sense. She welcomed black rule in South Africa, considered crime and violence a passing blip on the upward sloping chart of optimism regarding the formation of one multiracial, multicultural nation in South Africa where, to quote Samora Machel, the former communist president of neighbouring Moçambique, "for the nation to live, the tribe must die".

In South Africa, there can be no doubt as to which tribe must die. As far as I know, the term "white tribe" was first used by Time magazine to refer to my people in 1977, after which David Dimbleby of the BBC made a four-part series in 1979 entitled "The White Tribe of Africa". The notion must have met with universal acclaim, for in the same year Dimbleby's film received the Supreme Documentary Award of the Royal Television Society. Since the late seventies the expression has become something of a commonplace, and of course it is intended as a pejorative term, to ridicule us; “tribes” are after all backward peoples, lacking in civilization.

The author in front of the Union Building, from the magazine Insig

However, as I continued to gaze at the exposed abdomen of my hipster-wearing, politically correct photographer, I finally could not help passing a few ironic comments on her stereotypical views. As we stood at the Union Buildings I mused aloud, "I wonder what the people who built these buildings would have thought today if they knew that a few tribal chiefs almost one thousand miles from here, huddling around their campfire outside their huts would come to Pretoria in eighty years' time and forever subjugate their descendants to rule by their tribe, the Xhosa."

Our Xhosa conquerors: Winnie and Rohlihlala Mandela, with Joe Slovo, a gentleman of Lithuanian extraction

Model of a Xhosa hut: “The Xhosa Hut is one of the simpler structures and was developed in sparsely wooded areas, and is therefore constructed principally of mud brick. This is then plastered with mud, the whole being thatched with a conical roof. Both the building and the decoration was traditionally the responsibility of women.”

As I shall argue, South Africa is not just a story of one tribe conquering another, as the BBC or Time would have it. The greatest Xhosa chief in history, Rohlihlala Mandela, sometimes referred to as Nelson, did not just outwit FW de Klerk, the last white president of South Africa to subjugate South African whites to the most draconian regime of race preference the world has ever seen, taking the form of institutionalised anti-white racism and even "racial revenge" as a left-wing French journalist (Stephen Smith) has quite rightly called the continuing calamity of farm murders. The BBC's cliché, "the white tribe", has been followed by other slogans regularly chanted in South Africa, such as "kill a Boer, kill a farmer" or the charming one recently coined by the so-called Pan-African Students Movement of Azania (PASMA): "kill all whites, English and Afrikaans", chanted on 19 February 2005.

A similar anti-white mood to that of the PASMA students was expressed on 27 April 2004 when a group of us, just over a 100 with women and children in our ranks, had attended a meeting in the Ou Raadzaal, Church Square, Pretoria. Upon coming out we were confronted with the two individuals on the left who immediately and without provocation from us adopted a hostile attitude. Within seconds a large, aggressive crowd had assembled. The one pointing at his watch was telling us: “Your time is up, we are going to slit your throats.” Fortunately we were saved by three or four white policemen, armed with shotguns. A journalist from the pro-ANC newspaper, Beeld, named Jan-Jan Joubert wrote a snide report the next day, suggesting that we were “cowards” in not taking on a mob of 1500 aggressive young blacks and not risking injury to the women and children coming out of the hall.

However, and notwithstanding the vicious social violence raging in our country every day where innocent people are attacked in supermarkets, shopping centres, in their cars, in their homes and on the street, on farms and on university campuses, it may not even be necessary to "kill all whites, English and Afrikaans" as the enquiring young minds of PASMA have suggested in their innocent celebration of African solidarity. For the system of institutionalised anti-white racism designed by South Africa's ANC, with some help from Western governments, think tanks and aid agencies, is so beautiful and so effective that whites will voluntarily disappear by committing demographic suicide.

Demographic suicide

The demographic trend since 1868 when whites and blacks were more or less at parity in a vast, underpopulated country twice the size of France.

This point was brought home to me at the end of last year by an article in the Afrikaans financial weekly, Finweek (30 November 2005). Entitled "Wittes ál meer uitgedun. Die produktiefste segment van die bevolkingsgroep word al hoe kleiner" (Whites thinned out even more. The most productive segment of this population group is getting increasingly smaller), it summarises research showing the following: because of the ANC's race preference programme, young whites, unable to find jobs, are leaving the country in droves. Up to 800 000 of them have gone overseas since 1991. However, these same young people between the ages of 20 and 40 are of course the ones who will be fathers and mothers to the next generation of white South Africans. With their children born outside the country, the demographic effect on the remaining white population is simply devastating.

French author Jean Raspail has referred to the "demographic crash of the West". If the West is experiencing a demographic crash, we are facing a Great Crash of 1929 induced by the ANC's race laws. As the article in Finweek argues, the current generation of white men between the ages of 40 and 60 represent most of South Africa's intellectual capital. The average age of a South African civil engineer is 60. As only 2% of South African chartered accountants are black (a term which includes Indians and mixed-race Coloureds), it is feared that the steady stream of departing young accountants will cause a collapse of the financial system in the not too distant future.

Afrikaner negatives

Apart from negative demographics as a result of a low birth-rate and racially induced emigration, Afrikaners are up against the following:

Language discrimination with the object of destroying the Afrikaans language, the main source of cohesion among Afrikaners who represent 60% of the white population.
An effective tax rate of over 60% whereby wealth and income are transferred from us to the Afro-Saxon elite mainly composed of the ruling Xhosas. As we are dependent on private security services, health care and schooling funded from after-tax money, the ones who still work have become a "working poor" by Western standards and the unemployed or under-employed ones have formed a new class of "poor whites", educated and economically employable but unemployable in terms of ANC race laws.
So-called "land reform" whereby 30% of the country's land will be turned over to blacks. As only 12% of South Africa is really suitable for farming, this could mean that most, if not all, farmland will either be bought up with public funds or expropriated and given to blacks in a repeat of what happened in Zimbabwe, with the difference that the South African economy is not nearly as dependent on agriculture as that of Zimbabwe.
New gun laws intended to disarm whites so that they will not be able to defend themselves against future confiscation of assets during "land reform", and to stave off a future revolt of desperate whites unable to work or trade anymore as a result of the race laws.

Blacks used to complain about apartheid, but apart from the Group Areas Act restricting them to certain areas, there were no real restrictions placed on black mobility or economic activity. On the contrary, black economic activity was encouraged and subsidised in the quasi-independent homelands in the forlorn hope that blacks would migrate away from white areas if given their own economic kickstart. In addition, black education and healthcare were almost entirely funded by the white taxpayer so that apartheid could be seen as a kind of internal foreign aid system, as opposed to the external aid provided by the developed countries to most sub-Saharan African states.

In contradistinction, the ANC's system of "transformation" represents blatant anti-white racism, with a plethora of laws restricting white education, ability to trade, access to capital, ownership of land and other assets. In fact, apart from anti-Jewish measures during the 1930s in Nazi Germany, I am unaware of a similar system of systemic ethnic and linguistic discrimination in modern times. I have made a brief and non-exhaustive list of race laws currently in force in South Africa. Please note the Orwellian euphemisms used to disguise the ANC's arsenal of anti-white legislation:

Public Service Act Proclamation 103 of 1994
Labour relations Act no 66 of 1995
South African Police Service Act no 68 of 1995
Employment of Educators Act no 76 of 1998
Employment Equity Act no 55 of 1998
Higher Education Act 101 of 1997
National Sport and Recreation Act no 110 of 1998
National Empowerment Fund Act no 105 of 1998
Marine Living Resources Act no 18 of 1998
Broad-Based black economic empowerment Act no 53 of 2003
Pretroleum products Ammendment act no 58 of 2003
National Gambling Act no 7 of 2004

The Employment Equity Act probably represents the cornerstone of these race laws. It sets up a racial classification system in which whites are on the bottom rung, Indians and Coloureds in the middle and black Africans on top. In practice it prohibits banks and other large companies from employing young whites and aims to make all private corporations "demographically representative", i.e. whites may not occupy more than 9% of posts. As the white demographic crash continues, white participation in the formal economy will eventually sink to zero.

Please note that apart from these explicitly racial laws discriminating against whites, there exists also a myriad of regulations, so-called economic "charters" and unofficial practices that curtail white economic activity, employment and access to capital. Even small and family businesses are now being targeted. Such businesses will not be able to sell their goods and services to any large corporation, let alone the government, and will be denied access to bank credit if they do not have black partners who must own at least half of their firms.

The racial scorecard

There exists a racial scorecard that is widely applied in private firms and government departments to value employees:

Black female 6 points
Black male 5 points
Coloured or Indian female 4 points
Coloured or Indian male 3 points
Handicapped white female 2 points
White female 1 point
White male 0 points

Alain Finkelkraut: “... the lofty idea of `the war on racism' was gradually turning into a hideously false ideology. And this anti-racism will be for the 21st century what communism was for the 20th century. A source of violence.”

The French philosopher and commentator Alain Finkielkraut was absolutely right when he said last year that "... the lofty idea of `the war on racism' was gradually turning into a hideously false ideology. And this anti-racism will be for the 21st century what communism was for the 20th century. A source of violence."

Probably the most violent country in the world

South Africa under ANC rule has attained the dubious distinction of being the most violent country in the world. A recent advertisement on state television stated that 2000 women were raped in South Africa every day. We have more than 50 000 annual homicides. On the other hand, violence may be a symptom of totalitarian societies but it is not the only symptom. The comparison with communism is even more apposite in other ways.

The horribly tortured and mutilated corpses of Afrikaner farmers currently being killed in what some international commentators have designated a “genocide”.

Reported murders per 100 000:

Honduras (154.02)
South Africa (121.91)
Swaziland (93.32)
Colombia (69.98)
Lesotho (50.41)
Rwanda (45.08)
Jamaica (37.21)
El Salvador (36.88)
Venezuela (33.20)
Bolivia (31.98)

Transformation: could the South African revolution be exported?

As I stand here before you, my greatest fear is not that my people or my language will become extinct, that the Western civilisation that we have created over 350 years on the southern tip of Africa will be lost, however real and pressing those fears might be. My biggest fear is that the South African revolution of 1994 will be exported elsewhere, just like the Russian revolution of 1917 was extended to other parts of the globe, to China, Cuba, parts of Asia, Africa and Latin America. Many intellectuals supported communism in the twentieth century. Its influence extended to universities, the media, culture and the very way we look at ourselves. The egalitarian extremism of communism is not dead; it has simply metamorphosed into a new life-cycle, from being class-based to race-based. In post-1994 South Africa we have the most radical expression of this new biological communism going by the ominous name of "transformation". There can be no doubt that the ultimate aim of South Africa's current rulers is to eradicate all forms of what they term "whiteness" from our country, to change all names of towns and cities that we have founded, to rewrite and to falsify history so that it would seem that we never existed.

The South African revolution uses the same methods as communism to effect a far-reaching change permeating every level of society, including government at the national, provincial and municipal level, corporations, media, the legal system, the family, language and culture, even science. To give you an inkling of how pervasive the ideological control of transformation extends even beyond government: every sizeable private company has a "transformation department" that vets all appointments, even orders from outside suppliers to make sure that whites are systematically disadvantaged and ultimately reduced to being beggars at the gates. As a matter of course, blacks are paid higher salaries and may charge higher prices for their goods.

South Africa used to have one of the most independent, efficient and professional legal systems in the world, based on Roman Dutch law and English common law. Judges were sacrosanct and could only be removed from office by a two-thirds majority in parliament. Recently the Chief Justice of the Cape Division, John Hlope, referred to an Afrikaner advocate as, and pardon the verbatim quote, "a piece of white shit that should go back to Holland". In order to "transform" the legal system and get rid of white judges, a political court has been appointed above all others known as the Constitional Court. Apart from functioning as an ultimate court of appeal able to overturn most judicial decisions, it also functions as a kind of communist night school where seminars on history and human rights are held so as to give official ideology the authority of judicial blessing.

The totalitarian tendency towards brainwashing the entire population extends to schools, universities and especially private corporations. Employees are subjected to so-called "diversity training" where they are taught to respect African culture and to despise Western culture as being racist, elitist and colonialist. One of the most powerful Coloured intellectuals in the country (prof. Jakes Gerwel) stated that "the European renaissance led to apartheid" with the implication that all Western culture since 1492 should be eradicated just like apartheid was eradicated.

Living in South Africa today, it is easy to become a pessimist. To most concerned outsiders, our situation must look hopeless: we are outnumbered, our leaders have betrayed us, the formerly Nationalist Afrikaans press has become more liberal than the New York Times or the London Guardian and the whole world seems to support black South Africa in its relentless Cold War against whites.

However, in our very hopelessness might lie our salvation. For perhaps the first time since the Renaissance, a white, Western nation of several million people has become a real underdog, being dominated by - of all people - black Africans. Surely this David and Goliath struggle, one on which our very existence depends, will excite the imagination of the world?

Four pillars of Western civilization: European, North American, Australian, Southern African

As I have said elsewhere, there are four European or white civilisations that came about during our time of scientific, intellectual and geographic discovery from the fifteenth to the twentieth centuries: the European, the North American, the Australian and the African with its centre in Southern Africa, especially the area around Johannesburg and Pretoria where two million whites still live, speaking English and Afrikaans. In the uncompromising, cruel and unjust campaign to uproot us from our fatherland, exemplified by Robert Mugabe's anti-white land grab programme and the ANC's system of racial domination, we see the "beginning of the end" for Western man itself. The nightmare of all Europeans worldwide must be that the South African revolution should be extended internationally where the 800 million or so whites would be required to fund a welfare state for Africa, Latin America and South Asia. President Thabo Mbeki of South Africa has already hinted during the United Nations World Conference Against Racism in 2001 that the success of the South African experiment should lead to the eradication of what he calls "global apartheid". One imagines that under "global post-apartheid" billions of poor Africans, Latin Americans and Asians could directly control the savings and industrial capacity of the West.

Decline of the West

Is South Africa but the overture of a grand opera that is still to follow, leading to the dispossession of whites in Australia, North America and Europe?

Nietzsche and Spengler foresaw the “Untergang des Abendlandes”

Nietzsche, Spengler and others foresaw a time when the will of "the creative minority", to use Arnold Toynbee's term, would dissipate, a time when the herd and its values would be victorious. Toynbee called it a “failure of nerve”. Spengler spoke about the decline of the West, Der Untergang des Abendlandes, as a phenomenon not so much “limited in time and space”, but as a “philosophical problem that, when comprehended in all its gravity, includes within itself every great question of Being.” (Spengler 2000: 3)

Interestingly, Spengler claims not to study history as a series of causes and effects in the traditional sense. According to him, “what concerns us is not what the historical facts which appear at this or that time are, per se, but what they signify, what they point to, by appearing.” The fact that we suffered a diplomatic defeat against the African nationalists of the ANC in 1994 led to a revolution in South Africa but that did not immediately have an impact on Europe or North America.

However, it might be - and I am increasingly becoming convinced of this – that South Africa is but the overture of a grand opera that is still to follow, leading to the dispossession of whites in Australia, North America and the very origin of our type and civilization, Europe itself.

That is why the plight of Afrikaners and white South Africans concerns not just us, but you as well. Many of our people think that they can buy time or run away from the problem by emigrating to Australia, North America or Western Europe. Ultimately, however, there is no escape as events over the last few months and years have made clear, portending a worldwide clash of civilizations in which the European, the white, will be targeted and made to submit to the demographic power of Africa, Latin America, India and southern Asia. The French riots or the furore over the Danish cartoons represent outbreaks of anti-white sentiment that will increase in scope and ferocity over the coming years.

In my book The Scourge of the ANC, I have called the current South African system a “perversion of the Western democratic idea”. Increasingly, the UN and the third-world lobby - often led by South Africa’s black rulers - would like to see an extension of the South African system where numbers alone would constitute the key to all political power. Already in my country we live, not in a “democracy”, but in a “demography”.

Apart from the institution of a racial census in 1994 to determine who should hold power, the South African revolution was founded on a double betrayal: the betrayal of South African whites by their Western kin who actually wanted to see them subjugated by Africans, as well as the betrayal of the Afrikaners by their own leaders who blindly accepted the worst possible outcome which would completely dispossess whites and make them effectively foreigners in the land of their birth. Betrayal by one’s own is worse than defeat by one’s enemy. Cicero may already have said this, but it bears repeating.

"A nation can survive its fools and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly against the city. But the traitor moves among those within the gates freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears no traitor; he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men."

- Cicero, Speech to the Roman Senate

An Afrikaner liberation programme

Like most Westerners, we tend to analyse and theorize a lot. We do not just act on blind intuition, grab a knife and rush out to kill the nearest black in a mob while chanting, "Kill all blacks, kill all kaffirs", like blacks are wont to do to whites. But theory can also prevent action. That is why we must have a highly practical approach to our liberation struggle. Here are my proposals for an Afrikaner liberation struggle:

Bring the majority of Afrikaner cultural organisations together in an Afrikaner Council which would demand self-determination from black South Africa under the slogan "five percent of the land for five percent of the people". (In this respect we are already half-way there as dozens of Afrikaner organisations have expressed a need for solidarity over the past few months and informal talks toward unity have been going on.)
Start a mainstream Afrikaans-language daily newspaper to counter government and corporate propaganda maintaining that we should accept subservience, daily violence and lawlessness, as well as racial domination and dispossession. According to my calculations, such a newspaper could have a circulation of 100 000 within one year, would cost about R50 million or $8 million to set up and would eventually show an annual after-tax profit of a similar amount ($8 million). Alternately, an internet daily could be set up for much less and also exert much influence.
Publicise the plight of white South Africans worldwide, with an emphasis on the violence, injustice and anti-racist racism that we are suffering from. Let post-apartheid South Africa become a rallying point for whites in Europe (including Eastern Europe), North America and Australia/New Zealand, just like the anti-apartheid movement and its vicious exaggerations served to bolster the Third World and international anti-white movement. Up to a million of our people already live exemplary lives in exile all over the Western world, obeying the law and making productive contributions to their respective societies. Most of them are not there by choice, but have been driven from their country by violence and race laws. Once our movement takes shape, they will influence public opinion in their countries of residence.
Overturn the academic and media propaganda portraying whites as evil, money-grabbing colonialists whose only contribution to the world was slavery, racism and exploitation of innocent natives. The recent and controversial law in France requiring schoolteachers to stress the positive side of French colonialism is a step in the right direction. However, just think of the effect on the anti-white movement if we could overturn the international propaganda victory around apartheid! Many people, including most Afrikaner intellectuals, think this is impossible, but in my opinion the other side has overplayed its hand in portraying us as rabid Nazis having committed a so-called "crime against humanity" on South African blacks. George Orwell's dictum, that "In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act" should inspire us all.
We must set ourselves clear targets against which to measure our progress. A suggested date for our secession from black South Africa would be 31 May 2011, just over five years from now. Imagine the repercussions of our decolonisation from African rule where our right to govern ourselves as a predominantly white nation will be internationally recognised, as opposed to the international imposition of black rule we experienced in 1994.

Many whites, especially those on the right of the political spectrum, easily lapse into pessimism over the future, faced with our inexorable demographic decline, moral dissipation and empty consumerism. Weak political leadership seems to have become the hallmark of Western governments everywhere. However, an Afrikaner liberation struggle in South Africa could reinspire demoralised white populations everywhere.

In that sense, and without lapsing into the Calvinistic excess of traditional Afrikaner Nationalism which portrayed us a chosen people with a special calling in Africa, I firmly believe that we have a role to play in the survival of our race, not only in the biological sense of the word but also in a wider cultural sense.

Protest against the Pretoria name change a few years ago, followed by an even bigger demonstration last year. An amazing sight to see white, middle-class Afrikaners out on the streets! Singer Steve Hofmeyr is visible in the middle, sideways to the camera.

First of all, we are used to being outnumbered and of having the odds against us. There is probably not a single historical battle, be it against the British, the Zulus or anyone else, which we fought and won where we did not find ourselves in the minority. As the smallest of the four global pillars of European civilization, we have created an amazingly rich and developed culture, including a unique Euro-African language and a very strong, ubashedly white identity. After 350 years in Africa, often surrounded by coloured peoples, we have not intermarried or miscegenated to any significant extent, unlike the Portuguese and the Spanish who were soon genetically submerged by native populations in their colonies.

The Creole model

Images from the SA media: the ideal of the “rainbow nation”

In black-ruled South Africa, both our language and our identity find themselves under systematic attack. Until recently the world, specifically the Western world, conspired to destroy us and to make us strangers in the land of our birth, with the Creole model of the "rainbow nation" held up to us as the ideal. It is fine to be black or Arab in Europe, but being white in Africa is simply unacceptable. That is also why no Western government has expressed anything more than token diplomatic displeasure in seeing all white assets confiscated in Zimbabwe, with similar policies being implemented for our own farmers, albeit with much more violence than in Zimbabwe.

Beethoven in the bush

However, I daresay that today the West cannot afford to see us disappear. In any future war against America or Europe, our platinum, chromium and other strategic minerals will be used against the West. But even apart from the material advantages for our white brethren in having our independence and freedom restored, the Afrikaner people constitutes a unique reservoir of talent and survival skills, an exemplar of what everyone and everywhere will soon call the "minority white race". Hearing Beethoven in the bush might be even more important than hearing him in Berlin.

Afrikaner violinist Zanta Hofmeyr, scene from Kruger National Park

Can you afford not to support us?

As such, can you risk not to support us in our legitimate struggle to throw off the shackles of black racist domination, exploitation and injustice?

The “Prinsevlag” (Prince Flag), one of the oldest European flags dating from 1571 under which we are waging our liberation struggle, regularly painted on walls, statues and other symbols of the hated Xhosa regime.

Postscript
After this talk I was asked why Afrikaners and other whites do not simply leave South Africa to escape their inevitable displacement by the black majority who now enjoys a monopoly on power. My answer was fourfold:

We have invested too much effort in South Africa and are too rooted in our country to leave like the Belgians, Portuguese, French or British did from elsewhere in Africa.
We have no “home country” to return to and most Western governments despise us sufficiently not to want us as immigrants. They would prefer immigrants from China, Africa, India or Latin America to whites from South Africa.
We would cease to exist as a nation and our language and culture would become extinct. Leaving would therefore entail both national and cultural suicide.
We do not trust the Western leaders who, given a chance, would do the same to their own people as what De Klerk did to us: betray them and have them subjugated. We are simply “ahead of the curve” and soon other whites might find themselves in a similar situation to ours, being dominated and dispossessed of their very land, language and identity. So let us rather wage the struggle here than run away, only to be confronted by the same problem ten or twenty years hence.

Source: PRAAG

The Infinite Monkeys and Godwins Law

2009-09-29T06:00:00.000-07:00

If each human family were dependent only on its own resources; if the children of improvident parents starved to death; if thus, over breeding brought its own "punishment" to the germ line -- then there would be no public interest in controlling the breeding of families. But our society is deeply committed to the welfare state, and hence is confronted with another aspect of the tragedy of the commons.
In a welfare state, how shall we deal with the family, the religion, the race, or the class (or indeed any distinguishable and cohesive group) that adopts over breeding as a policy to secure its own aggrandizement? To couple the concept of freedom to breed with the belief that everyone born has an equal right to the commons is to lock the world into a tragic course of action.
~ Killing Times: The Killing Times are Here: Population Policy || Depopulation or Perish || Tragedy of the Commons ~

The Infinite Monkeys & Godwins Law

by Mike Smith | SA Sucks

Debating on racial issues is largely a one-way debate in modern society. Just about all the academics, politicians and Main Stream Media (MSM) institutions are advocates of Cultural relativism and Racial Egalitarianism. They believe in a fallacy and modern day superstition that all races are equal just like people in the Dark ages believed the earth was flat.

They constantly profess, advocate and defend this absurdity and false dogma with a fanaticism bordering on religious hysteria despite many scientists and anthropologist who did extensive work on differences between races and who published hundreds of volumes on the subject.

Trying to find works such as “The Bell Curve”, “Race and Reason”, “IQ and the wealth of Nations” or De Gobineau’s “Inequality of the races” in a public or University library is a rarity these days. Even academics who try to discuss race in the most moderate of fashions are met with academic intolerance and physical intimidation by racial failure apologists and egalitarians. All research that proves their theories wrong are shunned as “Pseudo-science” without the proof of this research ever been studied or even read.

One sees these phenomena also on the internet on forums where racial issues are being discussed. Anyone who provides a counter argument to Cultural relativism or egalitarianism is immediately attacked with an argumentum ad hominem to his person, called a racist and ignorant bastard.

It never stops to amaze me how hopeful these racial equalitists (a Mike Smith creation) can be. They say that if you just give the Blacks time, give them enough education, enough food, enough money, enough whatever…they will someday catch up with Whites and they will be just like us. They actually admit that there is indeed a difference between the races, but cannot see the fault in their Reductio ad absurdum. At the one moment they say the races are all the same, but the very next moment they say that Blacks could catch up with Whites (admitting that races are not the same or equal) through education, environment, etc.

That brings me to another favourite of the egalitarian Liberal which is to state that environmental conditions in which races evolved caused the differences in races (again admitting to the differences in races). When one points out that Eskimos lived in the Arctic Circle in the same conditions as Icelanders, Swedes and Norwegians, yet never created any civilisation, written language or even fixed building structures, the egalitarians want to point out that these primitives are actually more advanced than the Whites who did all of the above. The same can be pointed out from races living in tropical conditions such as the Cambodians who built Ankor Wat, the majestic temples of Thailand or the sophisticated buildings and societies of the Incas and the Mayas…yet the Blacks from Africa are an abject failure when it comes to creating or even sustaining any civilisation.

The interviews show some evidence for the "spiral of silence" explanation: many interviewed reporters felt that population is a hot issue, better left unmentioned.... Thus a spiral of silence about population growth may be maintained by determined pronatalists, immigration advocates, and intimidated journalists.
How and Why Journalists Avoid the Population-Environment Connection, Univ. of SW Louisiana

If one compares three island nations such as Haiti in the Caribbean, Iceland in the Arctic and Singapore in tropical South East Asia, the Blacks from Haiti should hang their heads in shame, because they inherited a developed French colony after murdering every single White on the island (40,000) and has been independent for the last 200 years. Haiti today is a dump; a slum of human excrement and filth, stinking to high heaven and the luscious tropical forests, sugar plantations, etc totally destroyed. Only 3% of the people ever finish primary education. It is a primitive society, dangerous and superstitious with the dominant religion of Voodoo.

Iceland endures winter conditions that last three quarters of the year. It is located on a volcanic island and mostly desert with no forests. Farming is almost impossible. It has no paper or wood products. There is no oil, no coal or natural gas. They compete vigorously with other nations on the Cod fish banks for their subsistence and uses ingenious geothermal energy to warm their houses and generate electricity.

Despite all of this, Iceland publishes more books and journals per capita than any other nation in the world. They have the highest literacy and the lowest infant mortality rates. They have the lowest crime and drug rates along with the highest standards of living. Iceland also has the best medical care in the world and the longest standing freely elected parliament in the world, The Althing. Iceland’s population is also almost exclusively White.

Singapore is built mainly on a salty marsh, where no crops can be grown. It has no minerals, etc yet Singapore is classed as one of the safest places to live in the world with a standard of living and education that surpasses that of many Western Nations.

Wherever man goes he adapts to and changes his environment into the image of his soul. Man either destroys the environment like in the case of Black run Haiti or he builds majestic civilisations such as in Iceland or Singapore. Man shapes his environment; the environment does not shape man.

Can Multiculturalism work? Yes certainly it can. Immigrant nations such as the USA, Canada and South Africa are testimonies to that. America is essentially a multicultural society made up for the largest part of European immigrants. Canada has French and English Whites. The Whites of South Africa are a mixture of Dutch, French, British, German, Belgium and some other White European nations. The White Afrikaner nation is probably the original and most Multicultural race on earth, so much so that they have developed an entire culture of their own with poetry, songs and higher learning institutions that pump out Doctorate theses of world quality on a regular basis despite Black ANC politicians who wants to undermine them around every corner. The key to their respective successes was not the mixture of White genetic material, but for the most part the exclusion of the Black genes. Any society where Blacks and Whites have indiscriminately mixed soon finds itself on a downward and backward spiral.

When confronted with these facts, the belligerent egalitarians insist that Multiculturalism is superior to racially homogenous societies, despite pointing out the successes of racially homogeneous, Liaises Faire, Capitalist societies such as Iceland, Denmark and Japan as opposed to the disasters of the Multicultural soup of South American countries.

None of these egalitarians can point out a single Black run country with low crime rates, high standards of living or high levels of education, yet they insist that Blacks and their cultures are the same as ours. Actually they don’t…they insist that all cultures are the same, but the White culture is always worse.

The multicultural egalitarians refuses to look at the facts and insists that throwing money at Blacks, giving them more education and changing their environment will eventually create sophisticated Blacks on par or better than Whites or Asians.

The recent experiment during the 1960’s and 1970’s in Australia proved this environmental theory wrong. Aborigine children were removed from their societies and placed in upper middle class societies with no shortages of food, quality education, etc yet still severely underperformed in schools and eventually reverting back to criminality, alcoholism and every other social ill. No amount of money, wasted education or change of environment could change the genetic primeval makeup of these savages.

The infinite monkey theorem states that a monkey hitting keys at random on a typewriter keyboard for an infinite amount of time will almost surely type a given text, such as the complete works of William Shakespeare. Why not? Infinity is a long time. Eventually the monkey will get it right. What if we take two monkeys and let them fire away on their keyboards? Surely we would half the statistical probability of them eventually writing “Hamlet”. So let us take it further and let an infinite amount of monkeys let rip at an infinite amount of keyboards for an infinite amount of time…what are the probabilities that a Shakespearian work will ever be copied word for word, ignoring punctuation, spacing and capitalization, from the original? Even if the observable universe were filled with monkeys typing for all time, their total probability to produce a single instance of Hamlet would still be less than one in 10183,800 …. But it is not impossible.

Then we have to ask the question, what is the probability of an infinite amount of monkeys, behind an infinite amount of keyboards hitting the keys at random for an infinite amount of time, ever producing the equivalent an ORIGINAL work of a Shakespearian quality?

Egalitarians not convinced will keep on trying to teach monkeys to read and write, count and teach them human behavior, trying to prove that we humans are just intelligent monkeys. They often come short, such as Sandra Herold who kept on trying to change her chimp, Travis, into a human until he eventually lost it and ripped her friend Charla Nash to shreds. LWB friend of another LWB comes short at the hands of the monkey they tried to turn into a human. I suppose some people just insist on learning the hard way.

No amount of proof, no amount of well researched evidence or statistical analysis will ever sway the minds of these cantankerous egalitarians. They are as persistent as shit in a woollen blanket.

After all the evidence has been produced and they have realised that they have lost, the liberal egalitarians revert to what is known as “Godwin’ss law”.
Michael Wayne Godwin is an American attorney who has spent a lot of time arguing on internet forums. According to Godwin’s Law, as any internet forum discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis, Hitler or Racists approaches 1[one].

Godwin’s Law can be seen on every forum. The moment multicultural, racial failure apologists loses an argument, they pull the “Nazi invective” or revert back to name-calling and the “Racist invective”.

Any blog, any website who ever discusses the racial issues, will start off with some intelligent comments, but before long it will degenerate into silly name-calling of “racists” and “Nazis” as soon as the socialistic liberal egalitarians who don’t want to work for anything, but expect free handouts for all, have lost the arguments about race. Some forums or blog posts will also degenerate into, “Jew bashing” or “Afrikaner bashing” giving another dimension to “Godwin’s Law”.

Liberal egalitarianism intolerance prevents any intelligent discussion about race. They want to smother every opposing view, yet claim to be the vanguards of “freedom of speech”. To them, “Freedom of speech” means everyone who agrees with them. They do not tolerate any opposing views. And if you dare to contradict them ..well, then you must be a “Racist”. “The Economist” had declared that “a good rule in most discussions is that the first person to call the other a “Nazi” or a “Racist” automatically loses the argument.”

Source: SA Sucks

HC-WC: # 19963/09: Notice of Intention: Application for Leave & For Judicial Review & FTR Notice: SA's Unrepresented White Refugees..

2009-09-22T07:32:00.000-07:00

Basic resources will prove inadequate for populations exploding beyond natural limits, and we may discover truths about ourselves that we do not wish to know. In the end, the greatest challenge may be to our moral order.
Resource scarcity will be a direct cause of confrontation, conflict, and war. The struggle to maintain access to critical resources will spark local and regional conflicts that will evolve into the most frequent conventional wars of the next century. Today, the notion of resource wars leads the Westerner to think immediately of oil, but water will be the fundamental need of some states, anti-states, and peoples. We envision a need to preserve rainforests, but expanding populations will increasingly create regional shortages of food--especially when nature turns fickle. We are entering the century of "not enough," and we will bleed for things we previously could buy.
Gross overpopulation will destroy fragile possibilities for progress in much of the non-Western world, and much of this problem is the West's fault. Our well-intentioned introduction of relatively crude concepts of sanitation and disease control, combined with our determination to respond generously to local famines, has allowed populations to explode.
~ US Army War College: The Culture of Future Conflict: Overpopulation & Resource Scarcity will be the Direct Cause of Confrontation, Conflict, and War ~

HC File # 19963/09: Notice of Intention: Application for Leave, & Judicial Review

Applicant: Lara Johnstone

Respondents:
(1) Magistrate Louw; (2) National Director of Public Prosecutions; (3) Hon. Patricia de Lille, (4) Mr. Thabo Mbeki (Former President); (5) Mr. Bulelani Ngcuka (Former NPA Nat. Dir); (6) Mr. Jackie Selebi (Former SAPS Comm.); (7) Mr. B.M. Skosana (Former Min. Corrections); (8) Mr. Nelson Mandela (Former President); (9) Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, Canada (Mr. Jason Kenney); (10) The Nobel Institute: Norwegian Nobel Committee

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE WESTERN CAPE

Court File No: 19963/09

Lara Johnstone ****************************************************** Applicant

And

Magistrate Louw *****************************************************First Respondent

Nat. Dir. Of Public Prosecutions[1]******************************** Second Respondent
» Hon. Patricia de Lille, MP, ID **************************************Third Respondent
» Mr. Thabo Mbeki, Former President******************************* Fourth Respondent
» Mr. Bulelani Ngcuka, Former NPA Nat. Dir. *********************** Fifth Respondent
» Mr. J.S. Selebi, Former SAPS Comm.******************************* Sixth Respondent
» Mr. BM Skosana, Former Min. Corrections ************************ Seventh Respondent
» Mr. Nelson Mandela, Former President *************************** Eighth Respondent

Minister of Citizenship & Immigration, Canada *********************Ninth Respondent
Per: Deputy Attorney General of Canada *****************************See [10], [11], [12] & [13]
Per: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
Per: Consulate General of Switzerland, Capetown

The Nobel Institute: Norwegian Nobel Committee *****************Tenth Respondent
Per: Royal Norwegian Consulate, Capetown ************************* See [10], [11], [12] & [13]

NOTICE OF INTENTION: APPLICATION FOR LEAVE & FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW:
ITO § 309B (1)) & 304A of Criminal Procedure Act (“CPA”); with § 24(1) of the Supreme Court Act:

Please Take Notice That:

[1] An Application for Leave to Commence an Application for Judicial Review under § 309B (1)) & 304A of Criminal Procedure Act (“CPA”); and § 24(1) of the Supreme Court Act has been commenced by the Applicant.

[2] In terms of § 304A of the Criminal Procedure Act, Review of Proceedings Before Sentence, if a magistrate after conviction but before sentence is of the opinion that the proceedings in respect of which he brought in a conviction are not in accordance with justice, he shall, without sentencing the accused, record the reasons for his opinion and transmit them, together with the record of proceedings to the registrar of the provincial division having jurisdiction, inform the accused accordingly, and postpone the case to some future date pending the outcome of the review proceedings. Such registrar shall, as soon as is practicable, lay the same for review in chambers before a judge, who has the same powers as under § 303.

[3] In terms of § 309 B, when in any application for Leave to Review, it is shown by affidavit, that further evidence which would presumably be accepted as true, is available; that if accepted the evidence could reasonably lead to a different decision or order; and save in exceptional cases, that there is a reasonably acceptable explanation for the failure to produce the evidence before the close of the trial, the court hearing the application may receive that evidence and further evidence rendered necessary thereby, including evidence in rebuttal called by the prosecutor and evidence called by the court. Any evidence received in pursuance of an application, for leave to review, must for purposes of the review, be deemed to be evidence taken or admitted at the trial.

[4] Should Respondents, wish to oppose the application, please notify the Applicant, of Your Intentions, in writing; during court proceedings on 23 September 2009 (Respondents Two to Eight); or serve it on the Applicant, and file it, with proof of service, at the Registrar, within 21 days (Respondents Two to Ten), of receipt of this application for Leave.

[5] If you fail to do so, the Court may nevertheless dispose of this application for leave and, if leave is granted, the subsequent application for Judicial Review without further notice to you.

[6] The application seeks leave of the Court to commence an application for judicial review of:
The decision of Court A Quo/Magistrate Louw in the Capetown Magistrates Court, dated 12 August 2009, in Magistrates Court File 14/1198/08 (previously # 17/1384/07), also known as SAPS File: CAS: 1340/7/07 (previously George: 572/02), and received by the Applicant on 12 August 2009, during court proceedings, wherein the Magistrate found the Defendant/Applicant Guilty on three charges of Crimen Injuria.

[7] In the event that leave is granted, the Applicant seeks the following relief by judicial review:

[7a] An order for a writ of Mandamus, or relief in the nature of Mandamus, which remedies the court a quo’s irregular Findings of Guilt, by requiring Magistrate Louw to comply with his statutory duties to allow for:
(I) An Order of Special Entry of Irregularities & Illegality (§ 317, CPA):
(a) Irregularity: Courts Irregular Conclusions: that the Defendant: (i) ‘Insisted on conducting her own Defence, refusing all legal representation’; (ii) ‘would not use the crimen injuria words ‘kaffir’ et al; towards another person again’;

(b) Illegality: State’s Unlawful Arrest of Defendant on 18 July 2007: in that the Arresting Officer intentionally and wilfully Arrested Defendant without any legal valid Arrest Warrant documentation;

(c) Illegality: State’s Unlawful Detention of Defendant from 18 July 2007, to 22 August 2007; in that the Arresting Officer intentionally and wilfully knew that the Defendant was arrested, and consequently being detained, without any legal valid Arrest Warrant documentation;

(d) Irregularity: State’s Irregular Pre-Trial Obstruction of Justice, by Allegations of Defendants ‘Mental Defects’, in that the State violated the Criminal Matters Amendment Act 68 of 1998, Due Process Referral Procedures by (i) coercing Defendant to see a State Psychologist on 19 July 2007; (ii) Insinuations to Defendants Legal Representatives as to Defendants alleged ‘Mental Defects’; & (iii) releasing a deceptive report to the Media on 19 July 2007, that (a) the Defendant had been referred for Psychological Observation; (b) the Report of such Psychological Observation, was to be submitted to the court on September 22, 2009.

(II) Order for the Reinstatement and Enforcement of Political Necessity Defence Formal Admission Agreement Obligations (§ 140 & 219A; 220; CPA), with related orders for:
(a) Clarification of Disputed Facts in Issue (§ 212B, CPA);

(b) Adducement of Further Evidence to Disputed Facts (§ 309B (4), CPA); and

(c) Securing Attendance of Witnesses to Disputed Facts (§ 179, CPA).

(III) [If (II) Refused, an] An Order to Correct the Record: Withdrawal of Defendants Political Necessity Defence Formal Admissions (§ 140 & 219A; 220; CPA); and

(IV) Leave to Apply to the High Court: Western Cape, for an Appeal of Conviction.

[7b] Alternatively, an Order for a writ of Certiorari, or relief in the nature of Certiorari, quashing the Guilt Finding of Magistrate Louw, and referring the matter back for re-determination in accordance with the law, by a different Magistrate; in accordance with § 313, Institution of proceedings de novo when conviction set aside on appeal or review.

[7c] An order for a writ of Mandamus/Certiorari, or relief in the nature of Mandamus/Certiorari, that should any Magistrate, High Court Judge, or State Official, dealing with this matter, on Review, or De Novo, fail to understand the Applicant’s (Defendant’s) Radical Hon(our)sty Religious Cultural language; that in terms of § 6(2) of the Magistrates Courts Act 32 of 1944, and/or Rule 61(1) of the Uniform Rules of Court; read in conjunction with the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act 108 of 1996, § 15 (Religion, Belief and Opinion), § 16 (Expression), § 30 (Language and Culture), § 31 (Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities); and Article 6 of the London Charter[2]; a Radical Hon(our)sty interpreter is provided for such Magistrate, Judge, or Prosecutor; at State Expense.

[8] In the event that leave is granted, the application for Judicial Review is to be based on, and in accordance with, the following Grounds for Review:
(a) § 24(1) Supreme Court Act 59, of 1959:
i. Absence of Jurisdiction; read with § 117 CPA, Special Case.

ii. Interest in the cause; or the commission of an offence referred to in Part 1 to 4, or section 17, 20, 21.. of Chapter 2 of the Prevention and Combatting of Corrupt Activities Act, 2004, on the part of the presiding judicial officer;

iii. Gross Irregularity in the Proceedings[3];

iv. The Admission of Inadmissible or Incompetent Evidence, or the Rejection of Admissible or Competent Evidence

(b) § 8 and 39 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act 108 of 1996 read with § 24 (2) of the Supreme Court Act 59 of 1959[4], and Civil Disobedience and the Necessity Defence[5]: among others: (*) the Nuremberg Principles of individual accountability, i.e. Article 6 of the London Charter[6]; (*) The Zykon B Case[7]; (*) the Nuremberg Defence in Pentagon Papers Case[8], * Chicago v Streeter, No. 85-108644 (Cir. Ct., Cook County, Ill. May 17, 1985)[9]; (*) Civil Disobedience: Conscience, Tactics & The Law & Blacks Law Dictionary: Civil Disobedience[10]; (*) Everett v. United States, 336 F.2d 979, 985–86 (D.C. Cir. 1964) (Wright, J., dissenting)[11].
i. Application and Interpretation of the Bill of Rights, in terms of the Common Law, International Law and Foreign Law; & spirit, purport and object of Bill of Rights.

ii. Due Process Irregularity: Denial of Nuremberg Principles Skills and Competencies in interpretation and application of common law ‘reasonableness test’

(c) § 15, 16, 30 & 31 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act 108 of 1996 read with: § 24 (2) of the Supreme Court Act 59 of 1959[12];
i. Due Process Irregularity: Denial of Freedom of Religion, Belief, Opinion and Expression, Language, and Linguistic Culture, Admissible and Competent Evidence.

(d) § 32 and 33 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Act 108 of 1996 read with: § 24 (2) of the Supreme Court Act 59 of 1959[13];
i. Due Process Irregularity: Denial of Access to Information and Just Administrative Action Principles, and Admissible and Competent Evidence.

(e) Johannesburg Consolidated Investment Co. v Johannesburg Town Council 1903 TS 111, at 310h[14] and 310i[15], 310j-311a[16]; 311h[17]; 312a-c[18]; 313d[19]
i. Principles of Review: Wider Review, Courts authority to intervene, not limited to 24(1) of the Supreme Court Act 59 of 1959, etc.

[9] The Applicant has received the informal written reasons from the Court A Quo [Annexure BB]; but has not yet received the Formal Written Reasons, or the Transcript of the Record.

[10] For the Record: State of Effective Emergency: South Africa’s Unrepresented White Refugees: The Tyranny, Disorder, Crime and Corruption of the State, has effectively resulted in a state of anarchy, where fundamental rights of due process, natural law, administrative law, safety and security, etc have been effectively intentionally, deliberately and maliciously suspended, as a result of corruption, incompetence and indifference. South Africa is heading towards a socio-economic, political and military failed state of Zimbabwefication. For example, South African Law Commission Issue Paper Six, alleged the Criminal Justice System to have a severe Legitimacy and Inefficiency Crisis, in that:
Communities are intimidated by the legal system, and ignorant of how it works.
Legal representation is inadequate and discriminatory.
Legal aid has not been able to serve its intended purpose.
The justice system's inaccessibility means it is perceived as illegitimate, ineffective, unfriendly, resulting in alternative dispute resolution whether legal or illegal.
Unnecessary complexities brought into access to justice and the mystifying language used.

[10a] Since 18 June 2002, the Applicant has accused Official Legislative, Judicial and Executive Officers of the State that their actions of commission and omission have, and continue to, demonstrate an intentional, deliberate, malicious and hostile indifference and unwillingness to provide for judicial and administrative due process and safety and security protections to the Applicant, and law-abiding, taxpaying ‘White Refugee’ citizens constitutional interests; by implementing policies which negligently, intentionally and deliberately foster and support criminal activity, ethnic and social conflict, tyranny and anarchy[20].

[10b] The repeated response from these State authorities, to these allegations was simply more actions of commission and omission unwillingness and indifference to its constitutional social contract duties and responsibilities; including repeatedly, by Respondents Two to Eight. For example:
A. The total indifference of Respondents Three to Eight, to respond to legal documentation submitted to their Offices, by Leader of the Opposition, Mr. Tony Leon, dated 20 August 2003, and 14 January 2004.

B. On 16 February 2004, Magistrate VA Botha, granted the Applicants Application for Leave, and Judicial Review, in SAPS Case 572/02; HC-CPD Appeal A 696-04. As of June 2006, the Second Respondent, Director of Public Prosecutions (Adv. Tarentaal) indifferently refused to place HC-CPD Appeal A696-04, on the High Court Roll for hearing.

C. The Second Respondent [Director of Public Prosecutions (Adv. Tarentaal)] aforementioned repeated indifference and refusal was the direct cause of the Applicant contacting Respondents Three to Eight, on 07 July 2007; to request their action in accordance with their social contract duties and responsibilities;

D. Respondents Three to Eight’s deliberate, intentional and malicious indifference and refusal, to act in response to the 07 July 2007 Legal and Political Request to them, was the direct cause of Applicants ‘civil disobedience’ actions, on 10 July and 16 July 2007, resulting in the five charges of this Crimen Injuria matter.

[10c] Foreign Law – the United States Declaration of Independence -- provides for the remedy, that when a government intentionally and repeatedly demonstrates a deliberate, malicious and hostile indifference and unwillingness to act in accordance with its social contract duties and responsibilities, towards its citizens; then such a government is accurately described as tyrannical and corrupt.

[10d] Citizens committed to a healthy social contract with their Government have a duty and a right, when any government becomes tyrannical and corrupt, and acts in destructive breach of the social contract; to alter or abolish such government, and to institute new government.

[10e] In contrast to Respondents Three to Eight’s strategies endorsing and inciting violence, mob justice and ungovernability, in their alleged ‘Anti-Apartheid’ (sic) struggle for a non-racial (sic) South Africa; the Applicant is a citizen committed to non-violent civil-disobedience, and the rule of law. Accordingly the only means the Applicant has of altering and abolishing a corrupt and tyrannical government, and instituting a new healthy social contract government, is to deny such a corrupt and tyrannical government, any respect as a legitimate authority, until it demonstrates that it is committed to upholding its social contract duties and responsibilities, as an impartial, legitimate and procedurally fair authority.

[10f] As of 07 June 2007, the Applicant does not recognize the legitimacy of any South African Official or Office, which is not willing to demonstrate its sincere and serious commitment to upholding its duties and responsibilities to the constitutional Social Contract.

[10g] While South African Legislative, Judicial and Executive authorities have, and continue to, refuse to confront, enquire into, or acknowledge the reality of the tyrannical Disorder, Crime and Corruption of the Failed State, and its effective nullification of the Truth and Reconciliation Social Contract, which has effectively resulted in a state of anarchy, where fundamental rights of due process, natural law, administrative law, safety and security, etc have been effectively intentionally, deliberately and maliciously suspended; a foreign court/tribunal has finally had the courage to impartially enquire into, and courageously confront, the reality of this evidence.
In the State of Ontario, Canada, on 27 August 2009, Board Member William Davis of the Refugee Protection Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board (“RPD”), in file number MA8-04910, found white South African, Brandon Carl Huntley to be a Convention Refugee, as a result of:

(a) South Africa's serious human rights problems, including police use of excessive force against suspects and detainees, which resulted in death and injuries, vigilante violence and mob justice: violence resulting from social, racial and ethnic tensions;

(b) Affirmative Action (AA) and Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) law requires employers with 50 or more employees to ensure that previously disadvantaged groups, collectively constituting more than 90 percent of the country's population are represented adequately at all levels of the workplace;

(c) Affirmative Action that has stripped the country of 75 percent of its skilled population and is responsible for the deprivation of the constitutional and social rights of white South Africans;

(d) As reported by the SAIRR, over a fifth of white South Africans have emigrated over the past ten years, their main reasons being crime and affirmative action;

(e) White Poverty is growing, as a result of AA & BEE legislation which reserves 80 percent of new jobs for blacks and favour black-owned companies for tenders;

(f) Killings and other violent crimes against farmers and their families continue in rural areas; and farmers are concerned that they are being targeted for racial and political reasons;

(g) Farm Murders: There are 40,000 white farmers in South Africa. Since 1994, over 2,000 farmers have been murdered in thousands of farm attacks, many brutally tortured and slashed or raped. Some victims have been burnt with irons and had boiling water poured over them, or down their throats.

(h) The Mandela "rainbow" revolution has become a cloud of gloom; where 40 percent of South Africans live below the poverty line, and unemployment is between 23 - 40 percent; violence runs unchecked throughout the country, and a woman is raped approximately every 26 seconds, where less than 1 percent of rape convictions lead to a conviction. Murderers also run free, without about 19,000 murders in 2006, more than 50 per day;

(i) A report documenting that most of ANC members are racist: this report states that it is time for the ANC to face up to the fact that most of them are racist and marginalized non-supporters and that it is the policy of the ANC and its endemic corruption that has brought South Africa to the brink of civil war;

(j) Police Corruption: Police Corruption is endemic and the chances of reporting corruption, ever seeing daylight are slim indeed.

(k) DA Leader, Mr. Tony Leon's accuses the ANC goverment of indifference to the lot of minorities, and hostility to whites;

(l) All of the above and more, shows a picture of indifference and inability or unwillingness of the goverment and the security forces to protect White South Africans from persecution by African South Africans.

(m) The objective evidence of living as a white person in South Africa, is that crime and violence resulting from social, racial and ethnic tensions contribute to a socio-political culture with a very significant possibility for white South Africans to be repeat and persistent, and systemic victims of excessive violence during any criminal acts, perpetrated against them by African South Africans; as a result of a socio-political cultural climate where the State is deliberately and intentionally unwilling to protect white South Africans; because they are white South Africans.

[10h] The SA Government (& Respondents Two to Eight)’s Commitment to the Social Contract with White South Africans, ranges from Negligent Indifference to Malicious Contempt to Endorsement of Rape and ‘Kill the Farmer, Kill the Boer’ Torture and Boer Genocide:
Former Minister of Safety and Security, Charles Nqakula is by far not the only person who is blatantly indifferent and contemptuous towards whites concern about crime, as he stated in Parliament; that ‘whites who keep complaining about crime, should either just go blue in the face, or leave the country’[21]. In 1998, then President Nelson Mandela (Respondent Eight) said the same thing. He claimed that fear of crime was mainly a white preoccupation fomented by a mainly white-owned press. Of people who left the country because of crime, the then President (Respondent Eight) said, “Good Riddance”[22].

Some years later the then Minister of Justice, Penuell Maduna, and the then Minister of Safety and Security, Steve Tshwete, scoffed at rape statistics when they said on American television, ‘We’ve been standing here for 26 seconds and nobody has been raped’[23].

[10i] The SA Government (& Respondents Two to Eight)’s Commitment to the Social Contract with Black South Africans, ranges from Negligent Indifference to Malicious Contempt, to endorsement of Culling the Overpopulating Useless Eaters: RSA Government Know the Truth About the Iatrogenic Origins of AIDS, but are covering it up.
1988: An article in Sechaba, the Official Journal of the ANC in exile, published in London in November 1988, under the title ‘AIDS and the Imperialist Connection’ questioned the African origin of the AIDS virus, and suggested that the AIDS virus may have been developed for genocidal purposes ‘in the secrecy of the laboratories of many imperialist countries.’ [South Africa's Brave New World: The Beloved Country since the End of Apartheid, R. W. Johnson]

2000: In Sept. 2000, Minister of Health, Mrs Tshabalala-Msimang circulated to Provincial Premiers and Health Ministers a chapter of William Cooper’s, Behold a Pale Horse; which alleges that HIV was specifically devised by the worlds ruling elite to reverse population growth. [South Africa's Brave New World: The Beloved Country since the End of Apartheid, R. W. Johnson]

2002: “We [The Nelson Mandela Foundation] are aware of the [20,000 US Government Scientific] documents [documenting that AIDS is manmade as a Biological Warfare Depopulation Agent]. They Mean Nothing To Us, our World is Not Ruled by the United States. We Have Our Own Scientific Ways of Doing Things in South Africa.” -- Official Statement by Nelson Mandela & Nelson Mandela Foundation Spokesperson, Ms. Zelda Le Grange, 11 October 2002 (in response to ‘Are the NM Foundation aware of the 20,000 US Special Virus Cancer Program Scientific documentation, documenting that AIDS is a manmade Biological Warfare Depopulation Virus) [14 Jan 2004: Notice of Legal and Political Delivery: Elimination of Executive Authorities Plausible Deniability: Iatrogenic Origins of AIDS Theory (PDF:3493K[24])]

2003: The Dept. of Defence: Surgeon General conducted an investigation of the Iatrogenic Origins of AIDS Theory: (a) The Surgeon General was in the Service of the State, employed by the Dept. of Defence, who in such capacity conducted an investigation into the Iatrogenic Origins of AIDS Theory, at the request of Lara Johnstone. The record of this Investigation is currently Top Secret/Restricted, including: (i) Names of witnesses interviewed, transcripts of their witness testimony; (ii) the evidentiary documentation submitted; (iii) the written reasons for any conclusions, justifying the entire investigation as ‘Top Secret’. [Restricted: 29 August 2003: Dept of Defence: Office of Surgeon General, Iatrogenic AIDS Origins Theory SA National Defence Force: Receipt Form for Top Secret/Restricted Doc’s (PDF:937K[25])]

2009: The SA Legislature have never conducted any Public Enquiry of the Iatrogenic Origins of AIDS Theory; nor made any efforts to declassify the Top Secret/Restricted Record of the Dept of Defence: Surgeon General’s Iatrogenic Origins of AIDS Theory Investigation.

[10j] The ZimbabweFication Future for Whites in South Africa:
Since the Zimbabwe land seizures began a decade ago, some 4,000 owners (virtually all white) of Zimbabwe’s most productive farms have been forced out, along with their 320,000 workers (almost all black) and their families, amounting to 1m-2m people. Although around two-thirds of the land has been allocated to 140,000 poor black families, the rest has gone to Mr Mugabe’s relatives and comrades, most of whom have little or no interest in farming. Vast tracts of fertile farmland now lie fallow; agricultural output has slumped. One of Africa’s biggest food exporters is now one of its main recipients of food aid. Of 6,500 white commercial farmers in 1980, when Mr Mugabe came to power, only about 500 remain.

Last November, in a case brought by Mr Mike Campbell on behalf of 77 other white farmers, a tribunal of the Southern African Development Community (SADC), a 15-member regional group that includes Zimbabwe, ruled that all land seizures since 2000 were discriminatory and violated both domestic and SADC treaty law. Mr Mugabe and his ZANU-PF ministers claim that the tribunal has no legal standing. In a further violation of the tribunal’s ruling, around 170 white farmers are now being prosecuted in Zimbabwe’s courts for refusing to leave their land.

In June the tribunal held Zimbabwe to be in contempt of court for failing to enforce its earlier ruling and asked SADC to take up the matter urgently. But at the group’s summit earlier this month, no mention was made of this or any of the other matters bedevilling Mr Mugabe’s seven-month-old power-sharing arrangement with Mr Tsvangirai. It was a stunning victory for the 85-year-old president. In a speech this week, Mr. Tsvangirai promised to stand by the farmers. Yet he has blown hot and cold on the issue since he became prime minister. At first he said that not a single crime against white farmers would go unpunished, though no prosecutions have ever been brought.

According to exiled Zimbabwean businessman, Mr. Mutumwa Mawere, former CEO of Shabanie Mashaba Mine Holdings (SMMH), Mugabe does not believe that a white person can own land in Zimbabwe. Furthermore, many leaders within the SADC, share Mugabes views that white persons cannot be African and do not have a right to African land. Of legal matters, before Mugabe Judge’s, which involve a white person or farmer: he says “the outcome would be known before trial.” Mr. Mawere states that the biggest mistake that African governments made at independence was the failure to resolve the citizenship issue regarding whites. Finally, Mr. Mawere states that African leaders who fought alongside Mugabe in the 1960s, such as President Jacob Zuma, are no different from Mugabe; “President Jacob Zuma you see today is not different from Zuma the freedom fighter you saw during the liberation struggle and therefore, you should not expect him to support [white farmers] cases at the SADC summit.” For a white person to “trust someone [in Africa], with state power to be good to [them], then you must be living in another world.”[26]

[11] Nuremberg Principles & Citizens Privilege: Accordingly the Applicant herewith informs the Tyrannical and Corrupt State Officials of South Africa (c/o and via Respondents Two to Eight, witnessed by Respondents Nine & Ten), the Applicant has signed the Why We Are White Refugees Petition (why-we-are-white-refugees.co.nr), herewith requested to be submitted by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, on behalf of all White Refugee Petitioners, to the Minister of Citizenship & Immigration for Canada, to be submitted to the Federal Court of Canada, for their due process consideration, in the matter of Minister of Citizenship and Immigration and Brandon Carl Huntley; Court File No. IMA-4423-09.

[11a] The Applicant, as a Why We Are White Refugees Petitioner, herewith requests the Federal Court of Canada, to take notice of the repeated intentional, deliberate, malicious and hostile indifference and unwillingness of the South African (and African) Government(s), to provide for judicial and administrative due process and safety and security protections to the Applicant, and law-abiding, taxpaying ‘White Refugee’ citizens constitutional interests. If Canada, and other countries do not grant White Refugees convention status, then they will be condemning African White Refugees, to an intolerable situation in Africa, where their basic rights, security and lives, are in danger.

[12] The following, is a schedule of documents that are material and relevant to this application, and are submitted, for paper and financial saving purposes on the Attached DATA DVD: Notice of Intention: Application for Leave & For Judicial Review, dated 11 September 2009
A. Annexure AA: Legal Argument: which consists of:

[AA.01] State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument dated 11 August 2009[27], as per 13 August 2009, Request to Cape Bar Human Rights and Pro Bono Committees: Request for: Impartial Record Keeping of Documentation: State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF:1154K[28]), and two DATA DVD’s:

[AA.02a] DATA DVD: Alternative Perspectives: 'Crimen Inuria' Concepts[29], and

[AA.02b] DATA DVD: Legalizing Evil II: Disobedience to Authority: A Political Necessity: P-al'Qaeda + TARBush = Catch 22[30];

B. Annexure BB: Conviction Unofficial Written Reasons: Paraphrased (99% accurate) of Decision of Court A Quo/First Respondents Finding of Guilt in Capetown Magistrates Court, on 12 August 2009 (PDF:4060K[31]); in Magistrate’s Court File 14/1198/08 (previously # 17/1384/07), also known as SAPS File: CAS: 1340/7/07 (previously George: 572/02); received by the Applicant on 12 August 2009, during court proceedings, wherein the Magistrate found the Defendant/Applicant Guilty on three charges of Crimen Injuria.

C. Annexure CC: Necessity & ‘Citizens Privilege’ Defence: which consists of:

[CC.01] SA Law Commission: Issue Paper 6: Simplification of Criminal Justice Procedure (PDF:58K[32]), 1997, documenting Legitimacy Crisis & Inefficiency of Criminal Justice System: Ch: 2, 3 & 5;

[CC.02] Civil Disobedience and the Necessity Defence (PDF:281K[33]), by John Alan Cohan, Pierce Law Review, Vol 6, No 1; which includes ‘Citizens Privilege’ and Nuremberg Principles Defence, et al;

[CC.03] The Right to a Meaningful and Informed Participation in the Criminal Process, by Fawzia Cassim, Unisa, Doctorate of Law Thesis, 2003: [a] Ch.3 Meaningful Informed Participation (PDF:68K[34]); [b] Ch.5 Right to Information (PDF:967K[35]); [c] Ch 6 The Right to Understand (PDF:198K[36]); [d] Ch 10 Right to Present One’s Case (PDF:321K[321]), etc.

D. Annexure DD: Jury Nullification Defence: which consists of:

[DD.01] The International Development of the Jury: The Role of the British Empire (PDF:400K[38]), by Richard Vogler, Sussex University, UK;

[DD.02] Lay Participation in South Africa: From Apartheid to Majority Rule (PDF:229K[39]), by Milton Seligson, S.C., Senior Counsel of the High Court of SA, Member of Cape Bar, Capetown, SA;

[DD.03] A Juror’s Handbook: Citizens Guide to Jury Duty (PDF:96K[40]), by James Joseph Duane, Associate Professor at Regent Law School in Virginia Beach, Virginia; which includes Jury Nullification: The Top Secret Constitutional Right.

E. Annexure EE: Canada IRB Ruling 27 Aug 2009: The decision of Board Member William Davis of the Canadian Refugee Protection Division of the Immigration and Refugee Board (the “RPD”) dated August 27, 2009, in file number MA8-04910: Brandon Carl Huntley[41] (PDF:21K[42]) (Pages 11-16).

F. Annexure FF: Why We Are White Refugees: which includes:

[FF.01a] Why We Are White Refugees, Afrikaner Genocide Report (PDF:110K[43]), includes (a) Alphabetical Listing of Farm Murders: A – Z; (b) 2008 Farm Murders in South Africa: Brief Summaries; (c) Genocide Watch 2002 Report on Boer Farm Murders; [FF.01b] FF.01a was submitted to Respondent Eight in June 2009; c/o Respondent Ten, as an attachment to: Nobel Institute: Nobel Peace Prize Committee: Notice of Legal and Political Delivery[44] (PDF:123K[45]).

[FF.02a] Why We Are White Refugees Petition to: Canadian Federal Court[46] (PDF:111K[46]); in the matter of Minister of Citizenship and Immigration v Brandon Carl Huntley; [FF.02b] Murder in South Africa (PDF:159K[48]), by Robert McCafferty; [FF.02c] The South African Police Service: An Organisation on the Brink of Collapse (PDF:198K[50]), by SAPS Specialist Ivan Myers; [FF.02d] Dr. Gregory Stanton: The Eight Stages of Genocide[51]; [FF.02e] Carte Blanche: A Bloody Harvest, Boer Genocide[52], by Susan Puren; [FF.02f] Minister of Safety & Security : Charles Nqakula: White Complainants about Crime, can Leave the Country[53]; [FF.02g] SA Institute of Race Relations: Governments Disdainful Indifference towards Concern About Crime (PDF:36K[54]); [FF.02h] Democratic Alliance: Auditor-General’s report reveals 79% of emergency [911/10111] calls are abandoned (PDF:36K[55]).

[FF.03a] Letter Mailed to Minister of Citizenship & Immigration, If Canada capitulates to RSA: I herewith request Contact Information: To File Documentation substantiating Huntley’s Refugee Application, of White Persecution Claims[56] (PDF:26K[57])

[FF.04a] 142 SA Academics Get It Wrong on Crime (PDF:128K[58]); [FF.04b] Brandon Huntley: An Open Letter to Canada (PDF:121K[59]): 142 Academics Denounce Granting of Refugee Status to White South African; [FF.04c] Statistics SA: Victims of Crime Survey (PDF:3930K[60]), 1998; [FF.04d] Democracy SA: Public Opinion on National Priority Issues: Ch. 11: Crime (PDF:31K[61]); [FF.04e] Institute for Security Studies: National Victim of Crime Survey (PDF:57K[62]), SA, 2003; [FF.04f] Paralyzed by Fear: Perceptions of Crime and Violence in South Africa (PDF:89K[63])

[FF.05] The Great South African Land Scandal[64], by Dr. Phillip du Toit, which documents the Zimbabwefication of South Africa’s Food Security, and includes Ch. 16: Slaughter -- The Farm Murder Plague (PDF:124K[65]): the murder rate of South African commercial farmers, is highest for a specific group in the world – 313 per 100 000.

[13] The following Affidavits attached hereto will be used in support of this application:
G. Annexure GG: Affidavit of Dr. Leonard George Horowitz, evidencing the Origin of AIDS, sourcing from Hepatitus B Vaccine Experiments by Agents and Agencies of the Federal Government of the United States of America, and the Merck Pharmaceutical Company (PDF:314K[66])

H. Annexure HH: Affidavit of Dr. Brad Blanton, evidencing the legal, psychological, and socio-political ‘citizens privilege’, Nuremberg Principles skills and competencies of Individual Responsibility, required for acts of civil disobedience to perceived illegitimate authority; and their application to the common law ‘reasonableness test’. (PDF:128K[67])

I. Annexure JJ: Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone; in support of Notice of Intention: Application for Leave and for Judicial Review (PDF:370K[68])

[14] The following Proof of Service Affidavit will be used in support of this Notice: Affidavit of Lara Johnstone in Support of Proof of Service of Notice of Intention: Application for Leave and for Judicial Review, marked Annexure KK.

Dated at George, Southern Cape, South Africa, on this day, the 22nd of September, 2009

[SIGNED]
Lara Johnstone, Pro Se Applicant
Tel: (044) 870 7239

TO:

REGISTRAR OF THE HIGH COURT
High Court: Western Cape Division
Capetown

AND TO:

FIRST RESPONDENT: MAGISTRATE LOUW
Capetown Magistrates Court

AND TO:

SECOND RESPONDENT (INCL. RESPONDENTS THREE TO EIGHT):
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS:
Senior Prosecutor Mr. Jacobs
Senior Prosecutor’s Office
Capetown Magistrates Court
Acting on Behalf of:
Hon. Patricia de Lille **********************Third Respondent
Mr. Thabo Mbeki ***************************Fourth Respondent
Mr. Bulelani Ngcuka ************************Fifth Respondent
Mr. Jackie Selebi ***************************Sixth Respondent
Mr. B.M. Skosana **************************Seventh Respondent
Mr. Nelson Mandela ************************Eighth Respondent

AND TO:

NINTH RESPONDENT: MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION, CANADA
The Honourable Jason Kenney, P.C., M.P.
Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 1L1

Per: John H. Sims, Q.C.
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Ontario Reg. Office, Exchange Tower
130 King St. West, Suite 3400
Toronto, Ontario, M5X 1K6
Tel: (416) 973 0965 | Fax: (416) 954 8982

Per: UNHCR Mr. Antonio Guterres
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
Case Postale 2500, CH-1211 Geneve 2 Depot, Suisse
Tel (41) 22 739 8111

Per: Consul-General Irene Flückiger
Consul General of Switzerland
No. 1 Thibault Square 26th Floor
(Cnr. Long Str./Strijdom) Capetown 8001
P O Box 563, Capetown 8000
Tel: +27 (21) 418 3665 | Fax: +27 (21) 418 3688

AND TO:

TENTH RESPONDENT: THE NOBEL INSTITUTE: NORWEGIAN NOBEL COMMITTEE
Thorbjørn Jagland (Chair); Kaci Kullmann Five (Deputy Chair)
Henrik Ibsens Gate 51, No-0255 Oslo, Norway
Tel: (47) 22 12 93 00 | Fax: (47) 22 12 93 10

Per: H.E. Ambassador Mr Tor Christian Hildan
Royal Norwegian Consulate, Cape Town
17th Floor, Southern Life Centre, 8 Riebeek Street
P.O. Box 4446, Cape Town 8000
Tel: +27 21 418 1276 | Fax: +27 21 418 1275

AND TO:

[Impartial Record Keeping Purposes]
Adv. Anton Katz
Cape Bar: Human Rights Committee
56 Keerom St., Chambers, Capetown

PDF Archive: White Refugees: HC-WC #19963-09