“Karl Marx had it wrong. Class has, been a major factor in history; but class itself is a derivative concept that is based on the ultimate causative power in history: sex. Control -- or the claim of control -- over the means of reproduction has been even more fundamental to history than has control of the means of production.”
~ Eve's Seed: Biology, the Sexes and the Course of History ~
“Unlike plagues of the dark ages or contemporary diseases which we do not yet understand, the modern plague of overpopulation is soluble by means we have discovered and with resources we possess. What is lacking is not sufficient knowledge of the solution, but universal consciousness of the gravity of the problem and the education of the billions who are it’s victims” -- Martin Luther King
~ Africa, Don't Blame the Whites | The Problem with Africa | Africa's Leaders Need a Paradigm Shift in Their Thinking ~
Letter to Cape Bar & Intn'l Bar Assoc: Pro Bono Committees
Subject: HC-WC In Forma Pauperis (Crimen Injuria) Review Application; RE: Freedom of Speech Political and Cultural Rights, or Secession?; Constitutional, Foreign and International Law Issues
* 09-11-07 Correction Update *
Letter: Notice of (i) Correction of Errors & (ii) Retraction of Enclosure; re: Encl. Your Life is In Danger (www.zasucks.com/?p=6151) (PDF:49K)
Enclosure: Annexure AA: Transparency Disclosure: Email Correspondence: Lara Johnstone to & from: SA Sucks: Doodler & Lone Wolf. Dates: Friday Oct 30, to Nov 5, 2009 (2603K)
Honourable Sirs/Madam,
[1] I am writing to request your Pro Bono Committee’s support, as follows:
[a] [Cape/Intn’l] To peruse the brief overview of legal arguments of fact and law; upon which I wish to found my Application for Leave, and Judicial Review;
[b] [Cape] Assist Mr. Stage, Registrar of the High Court, should he wish to contact you, in suggesting a suitably practicing Attorney or Attorney’s firm, in Capetown (or as relevant), whom the High Court, can accordingly refer my In Forma Pauperis application to, in terms of the provisions of Sub-Rule 1(a) of Rule 40 of the Rules of the High Court;
[c] [Cape/Intn’l] Please forward this correspondence to any Attorney, Attorney’s firm, or as appropriate, whom your Pro Bono committee consider may be interested or suitably qualified to provide me with Pro Bono Legal Assistance, in the capacity of either: (i) representation of counsel, or (ii) assistance of counsel; or (iii) a legal expert in the particular relevant fields of issue.
[2] Brief Summary of Grounds for Leave and Review:
[a] Absence of Jurisdiction: Crimen Injuria is Unconstitutional; State’s Irretrievable Breach of Truth and Reconciliation Social Contract Principles, and Denial of International Political, Civil & Cultural Rights provides legal grounds for Secession.
- The law of Crimen Injuria is unconstitutional, in that, it violates the fundamental principle which is the foundation of a ‘democracy’; namely the principle of freedom of speech. In a constitutional republic, there is no such right as the ‘right not to be offended/insulted’.[23]
- Denial of International Constitutional Right to a Jury Trial: The denial to South African citizens of access to a Jury Trial, to be judged by a jury of their peers, is unconstitutional, and a violation of the principles of International Political, Civil and Cultural Rights. Furthermore, a democracy is dangerous because it is a one-vote system as opposed to a Republic, which is a three-vote system. Three votes to check tyranny, not just one. Citizens have not been informed of their other two jury votes.
- Due Process Irregularity: Denial of Freedom of Religion, Belief, Opinion and Expression, Language, and Linguistic Culture, Admissible and Competent Evidence: » Secession and Self Determination:
- Law of Crimen Injuria conflicts with Applicants Radical Hon(our)sty Religion, since the law of Crimen Injuria requires the Applicant to lie, pretend and be a two-faced hypocrite; whenever it may be possible, that someone either with a sensitive ego, or a vengeance minded axe to grind, may choose to pretend to feel offended or insulted, by Applicants honest opinion, shared non-violently, in person to their face (not behind their back): verbally, or in writing[24]; by filing crimen injuria charges, and abusing taxpayers money on criminal prosecutions to massage their ego’s.
- Furthermore, if the constitutionality of Crimen Injuria is upheld, at the expense of Applicants Radical Hon(our)sty Cultural Religion, as founded upon (i) Radical Honesty Social Contract[25] and (ii) The Laws of Sustainability[26]; and those on behalf of whom she conducted her original civil disobedience act[27]; then such denial amounts to the final and irretrievable breach and nullification of the Truth and Reconciliation Social Contract[28]; providing for the Applicants international legal standing, for grounds for Secession and Self Determination, in accordance with the principles enunciated in Security Council Resolution of 1244, the “recognition of a human community within a sovereign state enjoying a right to self-determination.” (Radical Hon(our)sty Social Contract Offer: Revolution of “Being Black/ Being White” Consciousness; OR Minutemen Secession?[29])
[b] Gross Irregularities in the Proceedings & The Admission of the State’s Inadmissible or Incompetent Evidence, and the Rejection of Pro Se Defendant’s Admissible and Competent Evidence
- Courts Rejection of Applicants Pro Se Admissible and Competent Application: Notice of Intention: Correct the Record: Withdrawal of Formal Admissions (PDF[30]; Proof of Service PDF[31])
- Courts Rejection of Applicants Pro Se Admissible and Competent Application: Notice of Intention: Application for Leave, and Judicial Review (PDF[32], Proof of Service PDF[33]), filed subsequent to conviction, with supporting Affidavits, by two expert witnesses, supporting the Founding Affidavit (PDF[34]):
- Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, evidencing the legal, psychological, and socio-political ‘citizens privilege’, Nuremberg Principles skills and competencies of Individual Responsibility, required for acts of civil disobedience to perceived illegitimate authority; and their application to the common law ‘reasonableness test’ (PDF[35])
- Affidavit of Leonard George Horowitz evidencing the Origin of AIDS sourcing from Hepatitus B Vaccine experiments conducted by Agents and Agencies of the Federal Government of the United States of America and the Merck Pharmaceutical Company (PDF[36])
- Courts Rejection of Applicants Pro Se Admissible and Competent Application Prior to Conviction: Legal Argument: Political Necessity, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF37]; Proof of Service PDF)
- Courts Indifferent and Repeated Rejection of all Applicants Pro Se Applications, with the requirement that the content thereof is unworthy of serious impartial consideration, unless the legal format and application process procedures of its submittal meets the exact same legal standards as those required of qualified legal representatives, demonstrates the courts choice to act as a Critical Legal Literacy Interpreter Parasite instead of a Legal Social Engineer[39]; not to mention a confirmation of the facts, to which the court and State repeatedly demonstrated their indifference; as –- for example -- stated Applicants Application for Leave, and Judicial Review, dated 22 September 2009 [Pt 10] (PDF[40], Proof of Service PDF[41])
South African Law Commission Issue Paper Six, alleged the Criminal Justice System to have a severe Legitimacy and Inefficiency Crisis, in that:
- Communities are intimidated by the legal system, and ignorant of how it works.
- Legal representation is inadequate and discriminatory.
- Legal aid has not been able to serve its intended purpose.
- The justice system's inaccessibility means it is perceived as illegitimate, ineffective, unfriendly, resulting in alternative dispute resolution whether legal or illegal.
- Unnecessary complexities brought into access to justice and the mystifying language used.
- Due Process Irregularity: Denial of Nuremberg Principles Skills and Competencies in interpretation and application of common law ‘reasonableness test’ [Application and Interpretation of the Bill of Rights, in terms of the Common Law, International Law and Foreign Law; & spirit, purport and object of Bill of Rights]
- Courts Incorrect Interpretation of the Unreasonableness Test, and application thereof to Crimen Injuria: The correct test the court should have applied, was not the ‘man on the Clapham omnibus test’, but the test of the ordinary skilled political activist exercising or professing to have the special skills, in non-violently, by means of civil disobedience Nuremberg and ‘citizens privilege’ principles, confronting – perceived to be -- illegal political authority[42].(Affidavit: Brad Blanton PDF[43])
- Due Process Irregularity: Denial of Access to Information and Just Administrative Action Principles, and Admissible and Competent Evidence.
- Plaintiff’s Use of Crimen Injuria Charges were not honourable: Plaintiffs Intentions: Political Persecution of Applicant; by means of Perjury, and Fraud.
- State’s Prosecution of Crimen Injuria Charges were not honourable: Irregular and Illegal Actions of Complicity to Plaintiff’s Perjury, Fraud and Political Persecution of Applicant.
- Courts Refusal to allow Applicant the opportunity to invoke the Political Necessity Defence [Civil Disobedience and the Necessity Defence, John Alan Cohen, Pierce Law Review (PDF[44])]; renders Applicants Formal Admissions -- made, as required by, the Political Necessity Defence – null and void
- Court made irregular use of Applicants Null and Void Formal Admissions, as factual evidence to its findings of Guilt of the Applicant.
- Courts Refusal to accept Applicants Formal Admission Facts, as sufficient proof of such facts; renders (i) Applicants Formal Admissions as null and void; (ii) shows that 84% of the politicians who received the ‘crimen injuria’ text messages, considered them to be lawful, because they did not file any charges of crimen injuria; accordingly the crimen injuria text messages do not pass the crimen injuria ‘reasonableness test’, when only one out of six text message recipients, allegedly considered them to be an ‘insult to their dignity’; the exact same recipient who committed perjury in her affidavit and on the witness stand. (SAPS: Complaint of Perjury, Fraud & Persecution against Hon. Patricia de Lille PDF[45])
- Courts Refusal to Honour Applicants Notice to Correct the Record: Withdrawal of Formal Admissions, in accordance with Criminal Procedure Act § 105A Plea and Sentence Agreement principles.
[3]Crimen Injuria, Freedom of Speech (Secrecy/Transparency), Human Rights, SA Constitution, International Human Rights, Secession, Justification Defenses & Jury Nullification Legal Experts.
Furthermore, I have also CC’d the following, Legal Experts on these issues, who may, or may not, be willing to consider providing a bit of Pro Bono assistance, in regards to their particular areas of expertise, if so requested:
- Prof. Jonathan Burchell[46], Professor of Law, UCT. Professor Burchell is not only a legal expert on Criminal Law and Procedure; but also on Crimen Injuria; as the co-author of Personality Rights and Freedom of Expression: The Modern Actio Injuriarum (1998) Juta & Co. Ltd;
Crimen Injuria Legal Authorities, among others:
- In Primary Legal Code Word: Crimen Injuria, and Decoding Crimen Injuria & Racially Offensive Language: Legal Case Law et al, under Propositions of Law with Reference to Authorities, and Application of Facts to Propositions of Law, as found in State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF[47]; Proof of Service PDF[48])
- Prof. Richard Calland[49], Assoc. Prof of Law: Constitutional, Human Rights & Administrative Law, specialising in the law and practice of the right to access to information and whistleblowing protection; in administrative justice, public ethics and constitutional design. He is a member of the Transparency Task team of the Institute for Public Dialogue at Columbia University, which is led by Professor Joseph Stiglitz.
Transparency Quotes and Argument, among others:
- S v Hoho (493/05) [2008] ZASCA 98; [2009] 1 All SA 103 (SCA) ; 2009 (1) SACR 276 (SCA) (17 September 2008), as per: Decoding Crimen Injuria & Racially Offensive Language: Legal Case Law et al, under Propositions of Law with Reference to Authorities, and Application of Facts to Propositions of Law found in State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF[50]; Proof of Service[51])
- Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone (PDF[52]; Proof of Service[53])
- Supporting Affidavit of Dr. Len G. Horowitz (PDF[54]: Proof of Service[55])
- Supporting Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D (PDF[56]: Proof of Service[57])
- Complaint to SAHRC (WC-2009-0455BS): Crimes Against Peace, Crimes Against Humanity & Crime of Apartheid (PDF[58]; Service[59])
- Prof. Thomas Bennet[60], Prof. Customary & Public International Law, UCT, expert on customary law and human rights; teaches principles governing foreign judgements in South African private international law; principles of public international law; and international law on disputes.
Customary Law: Radical Hon(our)sty Cultural Religion, among others:
- Justification Defence: Political Necessity: (I) Freedom of Speech: Radical Hon(our)sty Cultural Religious Practice; (II) Disobedience to Legalisation of Evil/Nullification of TRC-RSA Social Contract, as found in Brief Statement of Defendant: Justification Defence: Political Necessity: (PDF[61]; Court Proceedings, 08 July 2009; et al: Proof of Service[62])
- Propositions of Law with Reference to Authorities, and Application of Facts to Propositions of Law found in State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF[63]; Proof of Service[64])
- Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone (PDF[65]; Proof of Service[66])
- Supporting Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D (PDF[67]: Proof of Service[68])
- Complaint to SAHRC (WC-2009-0455BS): Crimes Against Peace, Crimes Against Humanity & Crime of Apartheid (PDF[69]; Service[70])
- Prof. Pierre de Vos[71] is the Claude Leon Foundation Chair in Constitutional Governance and teaches in the area of Constitutional Law, at UCT. He is also the chairperson of the Board of the Aids Legal Network.
Human Rights & International Law Quotes (Too many to refer to all)
- Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone (PDF[72]; Proof of Service[73])
- Supporting Affidavit of Dr. Len G. Horowitz (PDF[74]: Proof of Service[75])
- Supporting Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D (PDF[76]: Proof of Service[77])
- Complaint to SAHRC (WC-2009-0455BS): Crimes Against Peace, Crimes Against Humanity & Crime of Apartheid (PDF[78]; Service[79])
- Prof. Wouter de Vos[80], teaches law of evidence and criminal procedure. He is a member of the Council of the International Association of Procedural Law and a member of the International Civil Litigation Committee of the International Law Association.
- Professor Francis A. Boyle[81], Professor of Law: International Law & Human Rights, at Univ. of Chicago. He is the author of Protesting Power: War, Resistance and Law (Rowman & Littlefield Inc. 2007) which has been used successfully in anti-war protest trials. In the September 2000 issue of the prestigious The International History Review, Professor Boyle's Foundations of World Order: The Legalist Approach to International Relations (1898-1922) was proclaimed as “a major contribution to this reinterrogation of the past” and “required reading for historians, political scientists, international relations specialists, and policy-makers.”
Human Rights & International Law Quotes (Too many to refer to all)
- Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone (PDF[82]; Proof of Service[83])
- Supporting Affidavit of Dr. Len G. Horowitz (PDF[84]: Proof of Service[85])
- Supporting Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D PDF[86]: Proof of Service[87])
- Complaint to SAHRC (WC-2009-0455BS): Crimes Against Peace, Crimes Against Humanity & Crime of Apartheid (PDF[88]; Service[89])
- Prof. Christian Tomuschat[90], Emeritus Professor of Public International Law and European Law at Humboldt University in Berlin; former member of the UN Human Rights Committee and the UN’s International Law Commission. He is the author of Secession and Self-Determination, in Marcelo G. Kohen, Secession: International Law Perspectives, Cambridge 2006; wherein he comments on among others, how Security Council Resolution of 1244, “displaying recognition of a human community within a sovereign state enjoying a right to self-determination” (p34).
Secession Quotes, among others:
- “Radical Hon(our)sty Social Contract Offer[91]: Revolution of “Being Black/ Being White” Consciousness; OR Minutemen Secession?”, at Pt.60, stated as the Heading for the Conclusion, in Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone, in Support of Application for Leave, and Judicial Review (PDF[92]; Proof of Service[93])
- Prof David Skover[94], Frederic C. Tausend Professor of Law, at University of Seattle Law School; the author of among others, The Tactics of Legal Reasoning, and The death of Discourse, and The Trials of Lenny Bruce. In 2003, Skover and his coauthor, Ron Collins, successfully petitioned Governor Pataki of New York State to posthumously pardon Lenny Bruce. In 2004, they received the Hugh Hefner First Amendment Award for The Trials of Lenny Bruce and their pardon effort.
Prof. Kover quoted:
- Law: Critical Literacy Interpretation of Legal Code Words: under Propositions of Law with Reference to Authorities in State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF[95]; Proof of Service[96])
Lenny Bruce Quotes:
- Prof. James Joseph Duane[102], Assoc. Professor at Regents Law School, Virginia Beach, VA: Author of among others: Jurors Handbook: A Citizens Guide to Jury Duty, which includes: Jury Nullification: The Top Secret Constitutional Right[103].
Jury Nullification Quotes:
- Decoding: Legal Justification: Jury Nullification; under Propositions of Law with Reference to Authorities, and Application of Facts to Propositions of Law, as found in State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF[104; Proof of Service[105])
- Jurors Handbook, submitted as Evidentiary document to Application for Leave, and Judicial Review, dated 22 September 2009 (PDF[106], Proof of Service PDF[107])
- Dr. Robert Schopp[108] is Professor of Law and Psychology at Univ. of Nebraska, and the author of Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Law: Justification Defenses and Just Convictions[109]. This major study advances an interpretation of criminal justification defenses (including necessity and nullification) that views them as an integral component of the structure of criminal law. It integrates philosophical analysis with a consideration of contemporary applications, & shows how these defenses are key components of criminal law, in the relationship between legal & moral justification.
Justification Defence: Political Necessity, references, among others:
- Justification Defence: Political Necessity: (I) Freedom of Speech: Radical Hon(our)sty Cultural Religious Practice; (II) Disobedience to Legalisation of Evil/Nullification of TRC-RSA Social Contract, as found in Brief Statement of Defendant: Justification Defence: Political Necessity: (PDF[110]; Court Proceedings, 08 July 2009; et al: Proof of Service[111])
- Propositions of Law with Reference to Authorities, and Application of Facts to Propositions of Law found in State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF[112]; Proof of Service[113])
- Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone (PDF[114]; Proof of Service[115])
- Supporting Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D (PDF[116]: Proof of Service[117])
- Complaint to SAHRC (WC-2009-0455BS): Crimes Against Peace, Crimes Against Humanity & Crime of Apartheid (PDF[118]; Service[119])
- Attorney Lowell (Larry) Becraft, Jr.[120], is a constitutional attorney based in Huntsville, Alabama, who specializes in criminal defense cases, primarily defending federal income tax protestors. Attorney Becraft is the attorney for Dr. Leonard Horowitz, whose Affidavit as an expert witness is filed in this matter, as a Written Statement of Consent in terms of § 213 of the Criminal Procedure Act: Affidavit of Leonard George Horowitz evidencing the Origin of AIDS sourcing from Hepatitus B Vaccine experiments conducted by Agents and Agencies of the Federal Government of the United States of America and the Merck Pharmaceutical Company. (PDF[121]: Proof of Service[122]; Proof of Service to SAHRC[123])
- Attorney Katya Komisaruk[124] Just Law Collective[125], Oakland, CA. Attorney Komisaruk is an ‘anarchist lawyer’, who specialises in defending and advising protestors engaged in civil disobedience tactics. She perhaps best known for her successful defense of hundreds of demonstrators arrested during the 1999 World Trade Organisation meeting in Seattle. She is a Harvard educated lawyer, who can speak with authority on the repercussions of civil disobedience, from personal experience of two years she spent in prison for vandalizing nuclear weapons navigational equipment at Vandenburg Air Force Base in 1987.
- Jon Roland[126], Founder & President of the Constitution Society. He is the 2002 and 2006 Nominee of the Texas Libertarian Party for Texas Attorney General; and currently exploring a ‘Ron Paul Libertarian like’ candidacy for the U.S. Senate in Texas. He has done a great deal of work in the field of constitutional history. Speaker at We The People Congress conference in Alexandria VA, 2007: Common Constitutional Errors. Accepted by a court in Williamson County, Texas in 2005, as an expert witness on constitutional and legal history. Seeks to revive the constitutional militia system envisioned by the Founders, involving the organizing and training of the entire population to defend their communities against threats, including threats from terrorism, foreign invasion, insurrection, crime, and disasters, and to secure national borders against unlawful entry. Discussed in Jonathan Karl, The Right to Bear Arms: The Rise of America's New Militias, HarperCollins, New York (1995).
Dated at George, Southern Cape, South Africa, on this day, the 28th of October, 2009
Lara Johnstone, Pro Se Applicant
Per: 16 Taaibos Avenue, George, 6529
P O Box 5049, George East, 6539
Tel: (044) 870 7239
Encl: Two SABlogger Reports: (I) Truth is the Real Casualty of the Reitz video, ZAmizdat; (II) Your Life is in Danger, Why South Africa Sucks
* 09-11-07 Correction Update *
Letter: Notice of (i) Correction of Errors & (ii) Retraction of Enclosure; re: Encl. Your Life is In Danger (www.zasucks.com/?p=6151) (PDF:49K)
Enclosure: Annexure AA: Transparency Disclosure: Email Correspondence: Lara Johnstone to & from: SA Sucks: Doodler & Lone Wolf. Dates: Friday Oct 30, to Nov 5, 2009 (2603K)
SAmizdat [http://antonbarnard.praag.co.za/?p=678]
The Politically Incorrect Facts: 2009: 10.27 ; by Anton Barnard
The truth is the real casualty of the Reitz video
Afrikaans is my home language but I am deliberately writing this in English, because of my extreme levels of irritation with the distortions, half-truths and outright lies being perpetrated by especially the liberal media and the left wing about the Reitz students, who made the so-called racist video involving cleaners at the University of the Free State. Most of the perpetrators of these malicious lies do, of course, understand Afrikaans, but for reasons of sycophancy or anti-Afrikaner hatred, pretend they don’t.
The facts of this incident make a complete and utter mockery of the hysterical screaming of the liberals and left wingers. It is trivially easy, using the demonstrable facts, to completely demolish the pack of lies on which the entire Reitz House “case” against the 4 students has been built. Not that liberals and left-wingers have even the slightest interest in the facts or the truth, however, especially not when it suits their nefarious purposes to deliberately ignore or distort the facts.
- The video is not racist. It was, on the contrary, made as a satirical response to anti-white racism, the ethnic cleansing of Afrikaans, Afrikaners and whites known as (racist) transformation, in terms of which the university wanted to force university students against their will to share their residences with those of other population groups. There is also a deliberate campaign to expunge Afrikaans as a medium of instruction at the university, and replace it with English. Whatever happened to the students’ constitutionally guaranteed concept of freedom of association, one might ask? Why are they forced to integrate, against their will? Where is the students’ constitutional right to be taught in their mother tongue? Where is the liberal media’s outrage about the injustice the Afrikaans-speaking students are being subjected to?
- As a white former university residence member, albeit at another university, I was subjected to the exact same ritual that the cleaners were jokingly subjected to. We were forced to eat mouldy bread, for example, and had molasses poured over us as an initiation ritual. The difference is in the video it was a joke, but in my case it was for real. Think what you may about initiations (which is an entirely separate issue that has much more to do with bullying than with racism) but there was no question of any racism in the Reitz video, except for the anti-white racism it was protesting against. Once again, the makers of the video in question intended their video to be satirical, and to jokingly pretend to show cleaners subjected to the same ritual that I and many other lily-white students had been subjected to over the years.
- The sycophantic left-wing media, for example Talk Radio 702, insist on continuously repeating an outright lie, i.e. that the students “urinated” (sic) on the cleaners’ food. Nothing of the kind happened. How many times must it be repeated before these liberal dullards will succeed in comprehending the simple truth: it was an orange cordial known as Oros. What is so difficult to grasp, people? I am again thinking of especially Talk Radio 702, that deliberately, knowingly and repeatedly spreads this lie in its news bulletins.
- In spite of the bilge spewed by those intellectual giants and experts in carpentry of the ANCYL, the so-called victims very clearly did not think that their dignity had been trodden on at the time. Had that adult prodigy Julius Malema and his equally gifted Cosatu comrades taken the trouble to view the entire video, it would have been abundantly clear that the so-called victims participated voluntarily and indeed laughingly in the video. The so-called victims even drank a beer and jokingly played rugby with their “tormentors”, and clearly had a good time in the filming of the video. Once again: nobody was hurt in any way, shape or form. Nobody’s dignity was compromised. There was no racism. Those are the facts; except the facts don’t suit the liberals or the left, do they?
- Months after filming the video, the cleaners clearly thought nothing more of it. They most assuredly never even considered laying any charges, or even complaining to the authorities. How could they, given that they were filmed while drinking on duty? It was only when the demagogues of the left stumbled on the video, that the insane screams of racism started, and the cleaners were brainwashed by others into agreeing that their rights had been trampled upon. This only goes to show up the extremely patronizing attitude that especially liberals have towards blacks. It is in fact not the students who displayed a racist attitude, but the liberals and left-wingers who decided on the cleaners’ behalf that they had not acted correctly by playing along and not pressing charges. How patronizing can one get? The cleaners are adults and as such surely could decide for themselves they had no problem with the video. Others, however, took it upon themselves to force the cleaners to “admit” that they’d been harmed. How much respect do those who imposed their views on the cleaners have for the judgement of the cleaners themselves? Are those that laid the charge not in effect saying the the cleaners, being black, are incapable of making a correct decision and require the assistance of external parties to realize when they’ve been slighted?
- When it was finally decided to charge the students in question, nobody was quite sure with what to charge them. Is bad taste, which is the worst that the makers of the video can be accused of, a criminal offense? The best that the prosecutions authority could come up with, was the largely irrelevant charge of crimen injuria. It is unclear how exactly this can be proved in any reasonable court of law – once again, the so-called victims were willing and laughing participants, who didn’t even consider pressing charges.
- Another egregious lie that keeps being repeated by the Nazis on the left (no doubt taking their lead from Adolf Hitler who famously said that a lie that is repeated often enough is eventually mistaken for the truth) is that the Reitz students showed no remorse. According to their lawyer, the truth is that they have attempted on several occasions to do so, but were not allowed to do so. Once again, one has to ask why not. The answer, of course, remains the same: in the Nazi-like propaganda war being waged on whites, the truth and facts don’t suit the left.
- While the left and liberals are screaming hysterically about a non-event, the shocking hate speech and naked anti-white bigotry of black students at universities, including the Free State university, continue unchecked. A few weeks ago, black students at Tuks embarked on a criminal orgy of violence and uttered death threats against white students who were trying to prevent the former from trashing the campus (as the more radical black students have been wont to do on multiple occasions.) On the very same campus where the Reitz video was shot, black students recently threatened to “rape the white bitches.” Yet, there is a strange silence about this ourageous black-on-white racial hate from all quarters, including the liberal mainstream media. Why is this? Why not also splash this across your front pages for months on end, rend your clothes and scream your outrage to the heavens, as you did with the Reitz video? Perhaps the liberal media also subscribes to the bullshit that blacks are not capable of racism.
I must admit that, even in spite of the demonstrable facts that I have provided above, I hold out very little hope that the truth, as opposed to anti-white and anti-Afrikaner propaganda, will win the day. The loony left and liberals clearly have no interest in the truth or the facts, and the Reitz House video is too convenient a stick with which to beat whites and especially Afrikaners. Given the political pressure, should the Reitz house case ever come before a court, they have no chance whatsoever of a fair trial. Should this trial be adjudicated by a racist black judge such as the Afro-fascist, liar and piss artist, “judge” Nkola Motata, especially, these students won’t stand a chance.
All the while, black radicals are free to spout their hatred of whites with barely a whisper being raised in the liberal media. Somebody must really explain to me one day why white students are not allowed to make a satirical video in which fun was had by all, but it’s followed by an immense and immediate outcry by especially the media. On the other hand, the liberal media clearly views the malicious destruction of university property, death threats and threats of rape against white students uttered by black students as not only not newsworthy, but quite possibly acceptable behaviour on the part of blacks.
* 09-11-07 Correction Update *
Letter: Notice of (i) Correction of Errors & (ii) Retraction of Enclosure; re: Encl. Your Life is In Danger (www.zasucks.com/?p=6151) (PDF:49K)
Enclosure: Annexure AA: Transparency Disclosure: Email Correspondence: Lara Johnstone to & from: SA Sucks: Doodler & Lone Wolf. Dates: Friday Oct 30, to Nov 5, 2009 (2603K)
Source & Related In Forma Pauperis Correspondence:
09-10-28: In Forma Pauperis Req. to Intn'l Bar Assoc & Cape Bar: Pro Bono Committees (PDF)
09-10-28: In Forma Pauperis Req. to High Court, W.Cape Registrar (PDF)
09-10-13: High Court, W.C. In Forma Pauperis Referral to Braam Swart & Partners (PDF)
![[Moon.Snow.Chateaux.Blu69] Ignorance of AIDS origins is Bliss; or is it Suicide? | SVCP Smoking Gun of AIDS | Emerging Viruses: Nature, Accident or Intentional?](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_JSpbgoKp8LA/SgF9SdWhUnI/AAAAAAAAEQ8/sUuNMuB2s1k/s400/44_lily-truth-yewgenics_33.jpg)
![[Seven Samurai] Santa Clausiwitz NSA PsyOps :: How Will World War IV (We Need to 'Cull' the Surplus Population) be fought? :: Slamdunk Tzu CIA PsyOps](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_JSpbgoKp8LA/Shm9dmhXiMI/AAAAAAAAEwk/BQJZ4Fblv-Y/s200/Kanji-Samurai.png)
![[Phi Day: 18 June - 18 July] From Kafir WarScience :: Mathematics, Symbology, Numerology, Cryptology, Conspiracy Coincidence Theories & Conspirators :: With Kafir GospelArt](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_JSpbgoKp8LA/Shv-1sEZPrI/AAAAAAAAEys/5lF18I7aYiY/s200/200px-Phi_uc_lc_svg.png)
![[Dischordianims: Rule of Fives Sacred Chao] National Security Study Memorandum 200: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_JSpbgoKp8LA/Shm-LgFoOoI/AAAAAAAAEws/d3g0PaXH28I/s200/100px-Sacred-Chao_svg.png)
![[17 March 2002: St. Patricks Day: Press Release: An Army of One] According to Legend, St. Patrick used the Shamrock, a three-leaved plant, to explain the Holy Trinity to the pre-Christian Irish People](http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_JSpbgoKp8LA/Sh2WiQWG0pI/AAAAAAAAE1Q/ix2k4waYM0c/s400/100_Irish_clover.jpg)
![[Kids Need Fathers; Not Visitors: Fathers Love for Justice]](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_JSpbgoKp8LA/SiMKNoAxeaI/AAAAAAAAFC4/ncfvnMuXkY0/s400/kidsneedfathersnotvisitors.gif)
![[Polar Bear Mothers Limbic Love Connection]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_JSpbgoKp8LA/SiMIx9yV1hI/AAAAAAAAFB4/pTYlrvsuZuA/s400/140_love.jpg)
![[St. Patricks Day Truth & Peace Press Release, 2002] Irish Shamrock Clover: According to legend, St. Patrick used the shamrock, a three-leaved plant, to explain the Holy Trinity to the pre-Christian Irish people.](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_JSpbgoKp8LA/SiMIqPC47jI/AAAAAAAAFBw/XjsIhLMaAfI/s400/140_Irish_clover.jpg)
![[Lion Fathers Love: Fathers Love 4 Justice]](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_JSpbgoKp8LA/SiMKF6PNxdI/AAAAAAAAFCw/YQxfi3o8AUY/s400/140_daddylion.jpg)
