Saturday, December 5, 2009

Frank Ellis: BBC's Reporting on White Farm Murders in South Africa & Zimbabwe

Pregnant (Again) and Poor || CIA & Pentagon's Perspective on Overpopulation & Resource Wars || When Environmental Writers Are Part of the Problem

What are we and they to understand as the connection between population and security? Population is a central element in nearly any concept of national security.

And in many regions the potential for conflict arising from simple overpopulation and starvation is large and growing. There is, of course, nothing simple about these problems; those who feel inclined to dismiss the seriousness of this potential should consider the question: "How does one say `Lebensraum' in Chinese?"

It should also be clear that solutions to the pressures created by population growth and movement, pressures that threaten the security of so many states, are beyond the means of any single state. Migration today can be controlled only by international agreement.
~ US Army War College: People Wars: Ruminations on Population and Security: How Does One Say 'Lebensraum' in Chinese? ~



BBC's Reporting on White Farm Murders in South Africa & Zimbabwe

Email from Dr. Ellis to BBC Radio 5


The following e-mail (excl. images) was sent by Dr Frank Ellis to Radio 5's Victoria Derbyshire in advance of her forthcoming visit to Zimbabwe and South Africa.

From: Frank Ellis
To: Victoria Derbyshire, BBC Radio 5
Date: 2nd December 2009
Re: Your visit to Zimbabwe and South Africa


I am contacting you in the hope that during your visits to Zimbabwe and South Africa you will confront head on with your black interlocutors (some of whom will be regime stooges) the racist and murderous behaviour of Mugabe’s regime and the tacit encouragement given by Zuma’s regime to black racist murderers in South Africa. There exists the very real danger – you work for the BBC after all – that you will refuse to tackle these questions since the organisation for which you work insists on presenting an anodyne, rainbow-coloured picture of South Africa to the rest of the world rather than the gruesome and savage reality that exists.

Some six years ago I met a farmer’s wife, Betty her name was, who had just been thrown out of Zimbabwe. Her crime consisted in the fact that her husband and she were successful, white farmers. Here is what happened. One day a gang of so-called “war veterans” (“war veterans” is the term used by Mugabe’s regime to describe the roving gangs who plunder white-owned farms and kill the owners) turned up at her farm. She was told that her husband and she would be thrown out of the country in one hour. Her husband died on the spot of a heart attack. Betty was only permitted to gather up enough personal effects sufficient to fill a small, hand-held suitcase. She was then taken to the airport and put on a plane. Betty and her husband had lived all their lives in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe. Not long after Betty related this harrowing account to me she died, broken-hearted and alone.
There is absolutely no doubt at all that Mugabe’s policy of dispossessing capable, productive white farmers and handing over the land and assets to incompetent blacks in the hope that blacks will simply continue what whites have created, nurtured and improved is the major cause of Zimbabwe’s miserable plight today. Indeed, inspired by Mugabe’s grotesque, Marxist policies of murder and mayhem, South Africa is already repeating the whole experiment and on a much bigger scale (see below). It is important that you and your masters understand these facts since Mugabe is solely responsible for turning a once thriving farming industry, with healthy surpluses for export, into a typical, Third-World basket case. No white person, man or woman, is responsible for this precipitate and dramatic decline. Mugabe and his fellow blacks confirm that when blacks are left to their own de(vices) regardless of any superior legacy bequeathed to them by the white man, the descent into murderousness and squalor is rapid and inevitable. Whites are not responsible for black failure. Nor do whites have any moral obligation whatsoever to make good the damage inflicted on Zimbabwe – disease, starvation, political violence and rampant inflation – by a deranged criminal and his peculiar brand of tribal, Marxist mumbo-jumbo.

If anything the situation is much worse in South Africa. The policies of the Marxist African National Congress (ANC) towards whites are racist, violent and entirely consistent with the way left-wing and communist regimes behave towards talented and competent minorities. Consider the fate of white farmers in South Africa. Since 1994, over 3,000 farmers and owners of small holdings have been murdered by black racist thugs. These murders frequently involve the most dreadful tortures being inflicted on the white victims before they die. Wives and daughters are raped in front of their men, tortured and then shot or hacked to pieces with machetes. The men are then tortured and eventually after the torturers have had enough are shot and left for dead. Babies, young children and the very old are not spared by these degenerates. In fact, the word “torture” cannot convey the unspeakable torments to which the victims - wives, women, girls, boys and fathers - were subjected before death released them. I have personally seen high definition digital images of white victims taken at the scene of crime by a Scenes of Crime Officer (SOCO). They are the most terrible images I have ever seen in my life. Nothing in my military service could ever have prepared me for what I saw.

Publicly, the ANC tries to play down these racist atrocities by claiming that violent crime affects everyone in South Africa, black and white. Up to a point this ANC claim is true but this claim hides, as it is intended to hide, the racial dimension of black-on-white crimes: the deliberate targeting of white farmers and others by black racists. Now, imagine the politically-correct, anti-racist fervour which would consume the BBC if some 3,000 black farmers had been robbed, tortured, raped, sodomised and executed by whites since 1994. One thing we can take for granted: FIFA would never have awarded the 2010 World Cup to South Africa.

In an interview with CNN over the weekend, Robert Mugabe stated once again, his support for the Final Solution and Extermination of White Farmers from Zimbabwe, as the ‘best thing to have happened to an African nation’. “Africa for the Africans”... » » » » » » » Only 70 miles from a 2010 World Cup football stadium, a farmer's wife and a boy aged 13 learn to defend themselves with lethal weapons... There are comparisons here with Zimbabwe and other calamitous reforms under the banner of “Africa for the Africans.” Special Investigation: The Secret Race War you won't read about in your World Cup brochure

I recently encountered white South Africans who maintain that whites in South Africa are the targets of genocide. Initially, I was sceptical. I have now changed my mind. There is no doubt that much of what is happening to whites in South Africa meets the criteria necessary to satisfy the definition of genocide: a group of people (whites) are the subject of deliberate violence which the government (ANC) either refuses to acknowledge or tacitly encourages (and does not prevent); whites are routinely denied employment and other opportunities so that low-IQ and poorly qualified blacks can be employed in place of whites; white culture (above all Boer) is denigrated, attacked and cultural artefacts are vandalised; the government media encourage a climate of hatred towards whites which makes it much easier for black racist killers to rob, to rape, to murder and to torture whites since they believe they have ANC approval. Here we can note a disturbing parallel with the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany. Long before the communists started to slaughter the peasants in the Soviet Union and the Nazis implemented the mass murder of Jews in Eastern Europe the state propaganda apparatus in both states targeted their respective “enemies of the people”. In the Soviet Union hard-working peasants were denounced as “parasites” and in Nazi Germany Jews as “agents of Zionism” plotting to stab Germany in the back. And what do we hear in South Africa: “One bullet, one settler”. The languages are not the same but the malevolent, genocidal spirit is identical.

Your visit to Zimbabwe and South Africa provides you with a unique opportunity to highlight what is happening to whites. It is high time that the BBC behaved in a way demanded by its charter. The BBC has an obligation to speak out honestly and openly, without fear or favour, and far as the fate of whites in Zimbabwe and South Africa is concerned it has so far failed to do so.

Source: Email
More Frank Ellis:

Boycott 2010 World Cup: Truth & Justice; or Secession?

Farm Murders in South Africa

Carte Blanche Documentary, 2002

Nothing has changed for the better since then, to the contrary.
Note: NOT FOR SENSITIVE VIEWERS, CONTAIN GRAPHIC IMAGES.







Friday, November 20, 2009

Sounding an Alarm on Oil: In Search of a Presidential Energy Policy...

[Svalbard Seven Samurai :: Seed Armigideon Lohengrin] AGRI-WARFARE: Eating Fossil Fuels, by Dale Allen Pfeiffer, From the Wilderness

If each human family were dependent only on its own resources; if the children of improvident parents starved to death; if thus, over breeding brought its own "punishment" to the germ line -- then there would be no public interest in controlling the breeding of families. But our society is deeply committed to the welfare state, and hence is confronted with another aspect of the tragedy of the commons.

In a welfare state, how shall we deal with the family, the religion, the race, or the class (or indeed any distinguishable and cohesive group) that adopts over breeding as a policy to secure its own aggrandizement? To couple the concept of freedom to breed with the belief that everyone born has an equal right to the commons is to lock the world into a tragic course of action.
~ Killing Times: The Killing Times are Here: Population Policy || Depopulation or Perish || Tragedy of the Commons ~



Michael Ruppert (FTW) Sounding an Alarm on Oil

Wall Street Journal


By Anthony Kaufman
04 November 2009


Michael Ruppert, at home with his friend, Rags, by Clara Tomkins.
Star of Collapse, Author of A Presidential Energy Policy, et al

Independent journalist Michael Ruppert predicted the global recession. Now he's foreseeing an imminent energy crisis

Michael Ruppert proudly claims that he predicted the global economic slump more than four years ago in his self-published "From the Wilderness," a monthly news publication and Web site. A narcotics investigator for the Los Angeles police department in the 1970s, Mr. Ruppert left the department and spent years trying to expose links between the CIA and drug smuggling; after 9/11, he wrote the 2004 bestseller "Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil," published by New Society Publishers and a favorite among conspiracy theorists.

Mr. Ruppert, 58 years old, has since moved on to what he believes are more pressing matters: oil and energy. ("I walked away from 9/11 five years ago," he says. "I have nothing to do with the 9/11 truth movement.") He has a new self-published book, "A Presidential Energy Policy: Twenty-five Points Addressing the Siamese Twins of Energy and Money," and a critically acclaimed new movie, "Collapse," in which he is the sole star and commentator.

Michael Ruppert, Collapse

Directed by documentarian Chris Smith ("American Movie"), the film consists mostly of Mr. Ruppert speaking about the dangers of peak oil and the looming catastrophe that declining oil reserves could bring. The film opens Nov. 6 in New York and on the new video-on-demand channel FilmBuff.

"The power of 'Collapse' is that Ruppert ... never sounds like a crackpot," Entertainment Weekly critic Owen Gleiberman wrote after the movie's Toronto International Film Festival premiere in September. "You may want to dispute him, but more than that you'll want to hear him, because what he says—right or wrong, prophecy or paranoia—takes up residence in your mind."

But as with "Fog of War," the Oscar-winning documentary about former Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara, Mr. Ruppert comes across in the film as both authoritative and dubious, leaving the audience open to make its own judgment of the man and his ideas. The Wall Street Journal sat down with Mr. Ruppert to discuss oil, Wall Street and the "imminent collapse of human industrialized civilization."

The Wall Street Journal: What is the central message of your movie?

Mr. Ruppert: It is not possible to continue infinite consumption and infinite population growth on a finite planet.

WSJ: So what do you believe needs to be done first?

Mr. Ruppert: Two things are critically important: A real worldwide transparent effort to determine how much oil is really left. Screw state secrets. I don't care what the Saudis, Russians, BP or Chavez want to hide. We have to clean up those books just exactly as the same way that we need to clean up the books on Wall Street. Secondly, we need to establish a second strategic petroleum reserve of refined product for state, county and municipal use because I really foresee a serious oil shock coming as soon as this ersatz recovery starts to push up the global GDP and demand for electricity. We have to make sure we have basic services.

WSJ: In no uncertain terms, you discount all alternative fuel options in the film, calling clean coal a contradiction and ethanol a "joke." How can you be so sure?

Mr. Ruppert: With 800 million internal combustion-powered vehicles on the planet and the fact that oil powers 90% of transportation, there is nothing that replaces what oil does. And transportation, of course, is what makes everything work, from shipping products to shipping people. And you cannot plug any alternative technologies into a 2008 GMC SUV or a 747 airplane. One of the things that I've also stressed is how much energy goes into making products: There's seven gallons of oil in every tire, and all plastics, paints and resins are made from oil.

WSJ: Do you think there's a greater chance of things turning around under the Obama administration?

Mr. Ruppert: No, it's not a matter of political party. It's a matter of energy. And money is useless without energy and money has no respect for power or ideology. We have to reconnect with the requirements that we're living on a planet that's falling apart. And we have to maintain some relationship that's separate from the illusory power of money. Clearly, the power in this country is not in Washington, it's in New York, with the Fed and with Wall Street.

WSJ: How do you see Wall Street playing a role?

Mr. Ruppert: Until you change the way money works, you change nothing. The current economic paradigm calls for infinite growth, from fractional reserve banking to compact interest. So Wall Street needs to somehow help us find an economy that works without requiring more and more consumption.
WSJ: You've been called "a purveyor of amazing tales" as well as a crusading investigative journalist. What's your response?

Mr. Ruppert: I have two responses: One is that I don't matter. You can focus on me or not, or you can focus on the likely imminent collapse of human industrialized civilization, and I think that's the more important story. On the other hand, I have been severely mistreated. I have been tied up with legal attacks for five to six years and there's only so many I can take on at a time. So I can take away time from reporting and spend time protecting my reputation. And I just made the tactical decision that getting the message out was more important.

WSJ: There's a great irony revealed in the film where we learn about your own economic collapse. Are you still behind in your rent?

Mr. Ruppert: Yes. But people are stepping up to help. We raised $17,000-$18,000 for the legal defense fund for this absolutely crazy ruling in Oregon. [Orgeon's Bureau of Labor and Industries has ordered Mr. Ruppert to pay damages for an incident of workplace sexual harassment.] So I have a lot of support out there. I'll just do whatever I have to do.

Source: Wall Street Journal

Mike Ruppert Documentaries: Denial Stops Here ** Truth & Lies of 9/11 ** Collapse

From the Wilderness: Archives :: Blog

Amazon Purchase: Presidential Energy Policy :: Crossing the Rubicon :: Denial Stops Here :: Truth & Lies of 911


Review of A Presidential Energy Policy, by Michael Ruppert, by Carolyn Baker

Energy Bulletin


Energy Bulletin
May 3, 2009


A Presidential Energy Policy by Michael Ruppert

American culture and consumption has become Public Enemy Number One in the global growth paradigm. People are realizing that the American Dream is murder....Unless a fundamental change is made-and quickly-the only available option is collapse and implosion; the bursting of the human population bubble; or, as people in the Peak Oil movement call it-the Dieoff. The sole purpose of this book (and my life) is to prevent that, or as much of that death and misery, as is humanly possible.
~ Michael C. Ruppert~


This is probably the most important book review I've ever written because A Presidential Energy Policy is unquestionably the most crucial book for anyone aware of the collapse of civilization, which is well underway, to read and understand. It is second only to Mike's first masterpiece, Crossing The Rubicon: The Decline of The American Empire at The End of The Age of Oil (2004).

I could have said, "Ruppert's first masterpiece", but Mike is my friend, yet that does not in any way deter my objectivity when assessing the inestimable value of what this book offers the world.

I do have a small quibble with one concept near the book's end on which I will comment later, but first, we need to acknowledge what Mike establishes in the first pages: "...oil price spikes in June and July of 2008 broke the backs of over-extended consumers who could no longer meet their (sub-prime) mortgage payments and that this-and this alone-triggered the great economic crash which began in September and October. Energy and money are inextricably connected in very profound ways...." Furthermore he notes, "The current economic implosion will and can only result in the greatest-and longest lasting-economic depression in human history-a new Dark Age, especially if some fundamental sea changes are not made immediately."


LEADERSHIP

Is gross mismanagement of the nation's energy policy an impeachable offense? 18July2006 :: PeakOilRSA :: BriefingPaper

In the first chapter, the connection between money and energy is solidly established, but more importantly, the need for leadership and the reality that the plan to deal with the problem has been kept secret from us largely, as Mike documented in Crossing The Rubicon, by the National Energy Policy Development Group of 2001, chaired by Dick Cheney. Presumably, one of the first steps in providing leadership to address the inevitable catastrophic consequences of Peak Oil would be to uncover the truth about oil supply and what contingency plans were formulated by Cheney's group.

Mike asserts that his status as a non-partisan expert on energy depletion with lifelong experience with government, frees him from having to "play nice" with political groups and parties. Consequently, the contents of this book and his expertise offer the leadership desperately needed to authentically address the crisis. Fundamental to doing so, he says, is the need to abandon arguments about offshore drilling and face head-on the reality that the current economic crisis "is a global economic meltdown. No nation gets out unscathed. Nothing can grow forever."

Not willing to ever consider himself a candidate for any elected office, Mike states unequivocally that A Presidential Energy Policy has been written for Barack Obama and will be successful even if it does nothing more than open the door to genuine dialog on energy and money; "one cannot be discussed without the other."

Nor does this book adhere to the agenda of any political party. As with nearly all of Mike's writing over the years, some parts are resoundingly liberal and resemble FDR's New Deal, and some parts echo a conservative Republican or Libertarian approach simply because Mike's overarching concern has always been to "implement policies that will keep the nation functioning and that will protect the American people and the world as a whole." Having said this, he asserts that no president can protect corporations and banks with taxpayer money and at the same time allow the nation and its working and middle class citizens to fail. Unfortunately, that is currently what Barack Obama, despite political rhetoric to the contrary, appears to be doing.


POPULATION

Today, 6.5 billion humans depend entirely on oil for food, energy, plastics & chemicals. Population growth is on a collision course with the inevitable decline in oil production.
Oil Factor: Behind the War on Terror

Concluding Chapter One is the familiar hockey stick diagram depicting population growth which of course correlates exactly with the dawn of the age of oil. While the reader may be tempted to overlook this important diagram, Mike returns to the population issue later in the book, and no reader should take the correlation lightly. The fact remains that human population has grown to its present level precisely because of cheap and abundant petroleum, and when that form of energy is no longer available to our species, the consequences in terms of how many of our numbers endure is obvious-a reality reiterated many times in A Presidential Energy Policy. It is therefore crucial that human beings begin to openly and honestly discuss the issue of population and commit to reducing it through means that are as humane as possible lest through our resistance to doing so, nature takes the matter into its hands and reduces population in ways that are horrific and unimaginable.

In this book Mike is thinking like a president and asks the reader to do the same. He also asks us to abandon all of the hype about alternative energies, green technology, and magic bullet solutions to the realities of Peak Oil and boldly confront the fact that "It is not possible to use enormous amounts of resources to address a resource shortage." While Obama and subsequent presidents will be faced with unprecedented energy crises, Mike reminds us that this is not just an American crisis and that the ramifications of burgeoning population growth alongside a decline in cheap fossil fuel energy spells nothing but doom for the human race unless it begins immediately to intelligently and humanely navigate what Mike calls two sides of a giant claw tightening its grip around all of us.

Therefore, the energy policy of the United States cannot be created in a vacuum. All countries, not just our own, depend on petroleum from other countries, and any president must thoughtfully ponder this fact and detach from wishful thinking about so-called energy breakthroughs, especially since the United States represents 5% of the world's population but uses 25% of its energy. He or she must also understand that oil depletion is happening far too rapidly to naively believe that switching to some attractive alternative is even possible.


SIAMESE TWINS, CHICKENS, AND EGGS

Truth & Lies of 9/11, by Michael Ruppert

In this book Mike is thinking like a president and asks the reader to do the same. He also asks us to abandon all of the hype about alternative energies, green technology, and magic bullet solutions to the realities of Peak Oil and boldly confront the fact that "It is not possible to use enormous amounts of resources to address a resource shortage."

In the "End of Suburbia", Richard Heinberg states unambiguously that Peak Oil will bring about a recession that never ends. In A Presidential Energy Policy, Mike Ruppert points out that:
All the new money being printed out of thin air is going to service a $700 trillion derivatives bubble to keep banks and lending institutions afloat. All that money is doing is enabling the financials to try and make their minimum monthly payments on a credit bubble they created.

In numerous places, including "The End of Suburbia", Mike has reminded us that the books on oil have been as cooked as the books on Enron, but it is now time for every country to know with certainty how much oil it has left. A key player in the ongoing mystery of how much oil remains on earth has been Saudi Arabia, and there is abundant evidence that that nation's oil supply has peaked, thanks to the brilliant research of Matt Simons, chairman of the world's largest energy investment bank and author of Twilight In The Desert: The Coming Saudi Oil Shock and The World Economy.

But not only must a president know how much oil his/her country has, that chief executive must carefully assess the limitations and disrepair of America's energy grid. While much of the nation's infrastructure has been and is being privatized, this does not mean that grid efficiency can be achieved within the next few decades, especially when skyrocketing energy prices will exclude many citizens from being able to afford the delivery of that energy at all. For as Mike notes, "A spike, even back to $3 a gallon will cause more hardship in 2009 than $4 gasoline did in 2008." Additionally, when assessing infrastructure, a president must include the costs of asphalt (highly petroleum intensive) and the loss of land which is very likely going to be needed for growing food. When infrastructure isn't rebuilt because of "lack of money or materiel, civilization starts to break down."


GEOPOLITICS, FOOD, CLIMATE CHANGE

Lest the reader infer that A Presidential Energy Policy deals only with domestic energy issues, Mike has included a chapter on Iraq and on Saudi Arabia, a separate chapter on foreign policy, and numerous articles by Mike regarding energy and geopolitics written in recent years are archived at the From The Wilderness website. In fact, he may know more about pipelines throughout the world and the geopolitical implications of them than anyone.

I must also mention that for me, no discussion of the collapse of industrial civilization, energy depletion, or economic meltdown can be complete without a discussion of climate change. In this book, Mike integrates the relevance of climate change in both his consideration of Peak Oil and the current economic depression. In this way, he offers a holistic assessment of what I have been calling for years the Toxic Triangle of collapse and what others have been labeling the "Triple Crisis": energy, economics, and the environment.

Eating Fossil Fuels, by Dale Allen Pfeiffer

And on the topic of environment, Mike says that "if there is anything that must be understood with regard to energy it is its relationship to food." Additionally, "If there is any issue which will reveal whether an American president is serving corporations or the people, it is food." Included in his chapter on food, are articles on the use of ethanol as an energy source, as well as one of the most important articles ever published by From The Wilderness, "Eating Fossil Fuels", by Dale Allen Pfeiffer. Connecting the disastrous use of ethanol with population dieoff, Pfeiffer presents us with three choices regarding population, that is: Facing and acting on our dilemma and consciously, voluntarily limiting population growth; allowing the government to regulate population growth; or allowing nature to perform unspeakable acts of suffering and death.

Having adamantly warned us for years not to be seduced by promises of alternative energies which they are incapable of delivering, Mike reiterates his cautionary assessment of them. As he has stated many times,"...there is no alternative energy or combination of alternative energies, that will permit current consumption and lifestyle to continue-let alone provide for the compound growth we are wedded to in the current economic paradigm." The supreme reality of Peak Oil is that we will be downsized, whether we intend to be or not. To deny this fact is tantamount to assuming that Disneyworld can be run on a handful of flashlight batteries.

But Mike doesn't present these facts without also clarifying specific criteria for choosing energy options. Carefully contemplating them is beyond sobering; in fact, it is chilling, especially when one considers the touting of so-called solutions like shale and the electric car-both large consumers of water, which like every other resource on earth has also dramatically peaked. Should anyone doubt this, I suggest the films "Thirst" and "Flow" which unequivocally document the decline of water worldwide. The last thing our species and the earth community needs is another form of energy usage that further depletes any of myriad disappearing resources on this planet.


LOCALIZATION
If the rest of A Presidential Energy Policy were not so incredibly juicy, Mike's laundry list of so-called energy alternatives alone, and his analysis of them would be worth the read. But he doesn't leave us there because he takes us into what I believe is the absolute crux of the book, namely, localization as "the alternative to the alternatives." As I write that, I'm reminded of some local farmer friends of mine who are off the grid raising three children and who do all their farming with draft animals. They're fond of pointing out that what we have become accustomed to calling "alternative energy", namely solar and wind, is the only tangible energy there is and that all other forms are, in fact, alternative. They do not, however, proclaim solar and wind to be the magic bullets that many others do. What they do proclaim and live, is the localization of all resource options.

In the Localization chapter, Mike advises the president to understand that:
...your first awareness is that the federal government cannot and will not take on the role of solving problems in cities and townships. That would be inefficient and inappropriate on every conceivable level. Only the people in each locality know and can decide what they need most. Each location has different needs. Your second awareness is that if localities fail at the bottom, the nation will fail at the top.

The Pharaohs of ancient Egypt were amongst the first people to recognise the importance of the Soldiers of the Soil. In fact Cleopatra declared the earthworm sacred, and anyone trying to take them out of the country was subjected to the death penalty. Tests carried out in the Nile valley by the US Department of Agriculture in 1949 proved that the great fertility of the soil there was due largely to the work of earthworms.~ SQ Worm Sosiety

Moreover, says Mike, all local responses to a tightening of oil supply will be dictated by the degree of self-sufficiency to which each community has liberated itself from dependence on anything from outside. Dear reader, please take the time to read that sentence again. The implications of this are jaw-dropping-and-absolutely necessary for us to wrap our minds around and implement, now. One implication is that globalization is dead. How well I remember Mike's statement in "End of Suburbia" that Peak Oil would absolutely reverse globalization. So hello human race, here we are with those giant parking lot gluts of cars all over the Los Angeles area, not to mention the Port of Long Beach, that no one will buy. For the same reason, when I enter a J.C. Penny's store, the walls and doors are covered with "70% Off" signs. Globalization, R.I.P.

As Mike points out, many individuals and families have relocated to areas where they can make themselves less dependent on fossil fuels and the goods and services of civilization. What is also true is that while we have organizations like Community Solutions and the Transition Town movement with which I am deeply involved in my community, those endeavors are still largely educational and have not been fully implemented. One stellar exception to this is Willits, California which has had a head start on localization for some time.

However, Mike adds a caveat with which I could not agree more, namely, that "There is no hope for any of us outside of a community." Here, it is important to broaden our definition of community because it does not necessarily mean a living community but rather, a group of folks in our local venues who are collapse-aware, who are working to gain self-sufficiency, and to do what is necessary to support each other in the face of collapse.

Hence, at this point I must raise the only quibble I have with A Presidential Energy Policy. In this must-read articulation of everything a president, and a nation's citizens must understand about energy, Mike has left us with what I consider a scenario that is less than feasible:
Whether as a result of the collapse of industrial civilization, the total insolvency of the United States government, the economic crash that is just beginning, or climate change (or all of the above), the effects on the United States government are going to be profound. Services are going to be cut. Bureaucracies are going to remain that may not be needed any longer, while some that may be desperately needed will not exist. At some point it will become necessary to put everything on the table and reorganize the government entirely. The imperative first-place-to-begin is the Executive Branch, which should be created anew from a blank sheet of paper.

In a subsequent paragraph, Mike states we may need to design and build a new Executive Branch of government that reflects the new paradigm being born and that for this, we will need new Jeffersons and Madisons-new founding fathers and mothers. While I do not rule out the possibility of this eventuality, I certainly do not believe it is probable. The very sea change that Mike has been brilliantly describing throughout the book dictates that we are now and will be in the days ahead, traversing territory that is absolutely unprecedented in modern history. For example, if we holistically consider the Triple Crisis, Toxic Triangle, or whatever we choose to call it-energy depletion, economic meltdown, and global climate change, then we must consider that any or all of those could radically alter not only the existence of a federal government but the very geography of the continent itself.

Last year I relocated from the Southwestern United States to Vermont. My reasons for doing so are legion, and I discussed some of them in my June, 2008 article "Location, Location, Re-location." Famous for its intense winters and high unemployment even in good times, Vermont is not for the faint of heart, and I do not recommend it unless one has job security and the ability to navigate a treacherous winter.

That said, one attraction to this sparsely populated state with its abundance of water and arable land is that it has always been a bastion of independent thinking and has today one of the strongest movements for secession in the nation. No, I'm not referring to some Rick Perry quip like "Texas might secede", but rather I'm referring to a group of thoughtful individuals who have been observing and preparing for collapse for several years. I happen to serve on the editorial board of their outstanding newspaper, Vermont Commons, the only statewide independent newspaper in Vermont.
While I am not personally a rabid secessionist, I have come to believe that preparation for the radical alteration of geography as a result of the Triple Crisis is essential for everyone who wishes to be self-sufficient. In this state, as in I would imagine all others, there are pockets which might be completely cut off from other areas as a result of natural disasters or collapsed bridges or other infrastructure which cannot be repaired-eventualities to which Mike referred in his wonderful book. I believe that not only is such fragmentation likely, but that those disconnections might become so severe that a federal government would become completely irrelevant to and out of reach for the citizens in those areas who might be cut off from the rest of the state and nation by circumstances which we cannot now fully imagine. In other words, "secession" may not the only means by which a community becomes radically self-sufficient. In my opinion, therefore, it behooves us, if we are truly committed to localization, to focus our energies accordingly, rather than on the remapping of the Executive Branch of the federal government. It is also entirely possible that no either/or will occur and that both scenarios will deserve our attention.

Revisiting The Limits to Growth, by Mathew Simmons

What Mike has emphasized repeatedly throughout the book is an urgent transformation of our thinking-a mentality that has left miles of unsold new cars sitting in lots all over Los Angeles-cars with seven gallons of oil in each tire. Only a profound soul sickness could create and maintain a civilization that is destroying everything in its path with little thought to the suicidal trajectory into which it has become locked.

I ask you to read A Presidential Energy Policy as soon as possible and share it with your friends and family. Share it with your elected officials and your neighbors and begin now to educate your community in preparation for the inevitable consequences of the Triple Crisis. Unquestionably, we are entering a new Dark Age, but the information Mike has offered, if heeded, could punctuate the darkness with a thousand points of light.

Richard Heinberg comments that "This book, recently reviewed at length by Carolyn Baker, describes the essence of our global energy predicament for a mass audience. Ruppert ties together the issues of oil depletion, resource geopolitics, population, climate, world currency/banking systems, and global food supplies, showing how perilous our current path is, and what we need to do to change direction. Short, readable, and clear, this is an ideal book to give to friends, relatives, or political representatives who don’t yet “get it.”"

Carolyn Baker, Ph.D., manages Truth to Power at http://www.carolynbaker.net/ and is the author of the just-published Sacred Demise: Walking The Spiritual Path of Industrial Civilization's Collapse. She is an adjunct professor of history and psychology and is the author of U.S. History Uncensored: What Your High School Textbook Didn't Tell You, (2006), endorsed by Mike Ruppert. Carolyn is also a former writer for and Managing Editor of From The Wilderness.

Source: Energy Bulletin

Mike Ruppert Documentaries: Denial Stops Here ** Truth & Lies of 9/11 ** Collapse

From the Wilderness: Archives :: Blog

Amazon Purchase: Presidential Energy Policy :: Crossing the Rubicon :: Denial Stops Here :: Truth & Lies of 911

Société Générale tells clients how to prepare for potential 'global collapse'

[ReEvaluating MI :: WorldIsland2Heartland :: SufiVilnius CoCreators]The Creature from Jekyll Island: The Federal Reserve Bank, by Edward Griffin

“Today, people are beginning to understand that the government's account is overdrawn, that a piece of paper is not the equivalent of a gold coin, or an automobile, or a loaf of bread—and that if you attempt to falsify monetary values, you do not achieve abundance, you merely debase the currency and go bankrupt.” —Ayn Rand, ‘Moral Inflation’

For the uninitiated, the moral of the story is simply this: Politicians invariably respond to crises -- that in most cases they themselves created -- by spawning new government programs, laws and regulations. These, in turn, generate more havoc and poverty, which inspires the politicians to create more programs . . . and the downward spiral repeats itself until the productive sectors of the economy collapse under the collective weight of taxes and other burdens imposed in the name of fairness, equality and do-goodism.
~ American capitalism whimpers || 'Atlas Shrugged': From Fiction to Fact in 52 Years || Objectivism: Bridging Liberal Conservative Environment Divide ~



Société Générale tells clients how to prepare for potential 'global collapse'

Telegraph UK


By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
Published: 6:12PM GMT 18 Nov 2009


Explosion of debt: Japan's public debt could reach as much as 270pc of GDP in the next two years. A bullet train is pictured speeding past Mount Fuji in Fuji city, west of Tokyo Photo: Reuters

Société Générale has advised clients to be ready for a possible "global economic collapse" over the next two years, mapping a strategy of defensive investments to avoid wealth destruction.

In a report entitled "Worst-case debt scenario", the bank's asset team said state rescue packages over the last year have merely transferred private liabilities onto sagging sovereign shoulders, creating a fresh set of problems.

Overall debt is still far too high in almost all rich economies as a share of GDP (350pc in the US), whether public or private. It must be reduced by the hard slog of "deleveraging", for years.

"As yet, nobody can say with any certainty whether we have in fact escaped the prospect of a global economic collapse," said the 68-page report, headed by asset chief Daniel Fermon. It is an exploration of the dangers, not a forecast.

Under the French bank's "Bear Case" scenario (the gloomiest of three possible outcomes), the dollar would slide further and global equities would retest the March lows. Property prices would tumble again. Oil would fall back to $50 in 2010.

Governments have already shot their fiscal bolts. Even without fresh spending, public debt would explode within two years to 105pc of GDP in the UK, 125pc in the US and the eurozone, and 270pc in Japan. Worldwide state debt would reach $45 trillion, up two-and-a-half times in a decade.

(UK figures look low because debt started from a low base. Mr Ferman said the UK would converge with Europe at 130pc of GDP by 2015 under the bear case).

The underlying debt burden is greater than it was after the Second World War, when nominal levels looked similar. Ageing populations will make it harder to erode debt through growth. "High public debt looks entirely unsustainable in the long run. We have almost reached a point of no return for government debt," it said.

What is the Mandrake Mechanism?: It's the most important financial lesson of your life!! ... It is the method by which the Federal Reserve creates money out of nothing; the concept of usury as the payment of interest on pretended loans; the true cause of the hidden tax called inflation; the way in which the Fed creates boom-bust cycles. The Creature from Jekyll Island: The Federal Reserve Bank, by Edward Griffin

Inflating debt away might be seen by some governments as a lesser of evils.

If so, gold would go "up, and up, and up" as the only safe haven from fiat paper money. Private debt is also crippling. Even if the US savings rate stabilises at 7pc, and all of it is used to pay down debt, it will still take nine years for households to reduce debt/income ratios to the safe levels of the 1980s.

The bank said the current crisis displays "compelling similarities" with Japan during its Lost Decade (or two), with a big difference: Japan was able to stay afloat by exporting into a robust global economy and by letting the yen fall. It is not possible for half the world to pursue this strategy at the same time.

SocGen advises bears to sell the dollar and to "short" cyclical equities such as technology, auto, and travel to avoid being caught in the "inherent deflationary spiral". Emerging markets would not be spared. Paradoxically, they are more leveraged to the US growth than Wall Street itself. Farm commodities would hold up well, led by sugar.

Mr Fermon said junk bonds would lose 31pc of their value in 2010 alone. However, sovereign bonds would "generate turbo-charged returns" mimicking the secular slide in yields seen in Japan as the slump ground on. At one point Japan's 10-year yield dropped to 0.40pc. The Fed would hold down yields by purchasing more bonds. The European Central Bank would do less, for political reasons.

SocGen's case for buying sovereign bonds is controversial. A number of funds doubt whether the Japan scenario will be repeated, not least because Tokyo itself may be on the cusp of a debt compound crisis.

Mr Fermon said his report had electrified clients on both sides of the Atlantic. "Everybody wants to know what the impact will be. A lot of hedge funds and bankers are worried," he said.

Source: Telegraph UK

Monday, November 9, 2009

[Update 16-11-07] Notice of (i) Correction of Error/s & (ii) Retraction of Enclosure; re: Encl.Your Life is In Danger (www.zasucks.com/?p=6151)

Today, 6.5 billion humans depend entirely on oil for food, energy, plastics & chemicals. Population growth is on a collision course with the inevitable decline in oil production.

To advocate for human rights, peace, and social justice while ignoring their necessary ecological basis --— a stable human population – at, or slightly less than – the eco-systems long term carrying capacity --- is intellectual dishonesty and hypocrisy.

The longer we put off choosing the nicer methods of achieving demographic stability, the more likely the nasty ones become, whether imposed by nature or by some fascistic regime. Urine Good Company might represent a mild version of what could actually be in store if we let the marketplace, corporations, and secretive, militaristic governments come up with eugenic solutions to our population dilemma.
~ Population, Resources, and Human Idealism, Energy Bulletin | Population Growth: Most Powerful Force on Earth, Money&Markets ~



Cape Bar & Intn'l Bar Assoc: Pro Bono Comm's: RE: Freedom of Speech Political and Cultural Rights, or Secession?; Constitutional, & Intn'l Law Issues

Notice of (i) Correction of Error/s & (ii) Retraction of Enclosure; re: Encl.Your Life is In Danger (www.zasucks.com/?p=6151)


Update 09 Nov '09: Corrections are as follows:

Letter: Notice of (i) Correction of Errors & (ii) Retraction of Enclosure; re: Encl. Your Life is In Danger (www.zasucks.com/?p=6151)
Enclosure: Annexure AA: Transparency Disclosure: Email Correspondence: Lara Johnstone to & from: SA Sucks: Doodler & Lone Wolf. Dates: Friday Oct 30, to Nov 5, 2009

  • Letter to SA Students Congress, Mandela Rhodes Foundation, ANC Youth League; RE: Reitz 4 & Black Culture...
    » 09-11-07 Correction: PDF:49K » Encl.AA PDF:2603K
    » » Sent: Sat 11/7/2009 11:18 PM
    » » Honey Attorneys: Read: Mon 11/9/2009 4:16 PM

  • Letter to Irish Embassy, Jefferson Family & Independent Newspapers; RE: Boycott 2010 World Cup
    » 09-11-07 Correction: PDF:49K » Encl.AA PDF:2603K
    » » Sent: Sat 11/7/2009 10:00 PM
    » » Owen Swaine Solicitors: Read: Sun 11/8/2009 6:31 PM

  • Letter to Austrian Embassy, Burgstaller & Symcox Families; RE: Boycott 2010 World Cup
    » 09-11-07 Correction: PDF:49K » Encl.AA PDF:2603K
    » » Sent: Sat 11/7/2009 9:36 PM
    » » Austrian Embassy, Pta: Read: Mon 11/9/2009 8:48 AM

  • Boycott 2010 World Cup!: Truth & Justice; or Secession?
    » 09-11-07 Correction: PDF:49K » Encl.AA PDF:2603K

  • PC Canada vs. IRB & Huntley: How many SA Black on White Crimes are Racially Motivated?
    » 09-11-07 Correction: PDF:49K » Encl.AA PDF:2603K
    » » Sent: Tue 11/10/2009 12:34 AM
    » » SA HC in Canada: Read on 11/9/2009 8:32 AM
    » » Min. Citizenship & Immig, Canada: Read: Mon 11/9/2009 2:31 PM
    » » High. Comm. of Canada, Pta: Read: Sat 11/7/2009 11:14 PM

  • Cape Bar & Intn'l Bar Assoc: Pro Bono Comm's: RE: Freedom of Speech Political and Cultural Rights, or Secession?; Constitutional, & Intn'l Law Issues
    » 09-11-07 Correction: PDF:55K » Encl.AA PDF:2603K
    » » Sent: Mon 11/9/2009 2:26 PM
    » » Cape Bar Assoc.: Read: Mon 11/9/2009 2:31 PM
    » » Intn'l Bar Assoc.: Read: Mon 11/9/2009 2:27 PM
    Your message
    To: OTP InformationDesk; JAGCMC@navy.mil;
    Cc: www.miragestorum.co.nr
    Subject: RE: [Update] ICC Prosecutor: Info & Evidence Unit (CC: Dep. Judge Adv. Gen., US Navy JAG Office)
    Sent: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:27:54 +0100
    was read on Mon, 9 Nov 2009 17:29:45 +0100
My apologies for the inconvenience and the error.

Update: 10 November '09:

ILuvSA Retractions & Corrections: Vanilla Ice: Black Swans, Misrepresentations and the Truth

Update: 16 November '09:

Ontmaskering:: ZA Sucks # 6151: Image Provocateurs?: The Context » » The Evidence
Brief Forensic Investigation Conclusion: Four of the 13 alleged 'South African crime scene photographs' posted by Uhuru Guru/Lone Wolf, to Doodler's SA Sucks post, Your Life is In Danger (#6151), are unequivocally and undoubtedly not South African crime scene photographs, from South African police files. Furthermore, three of the alleged 'crime scene' photographs, are used online by individuals pornography preferences include crime scene corpses. As a result of the distastefullness of the evidence to these allegations: The forensic evidence is only available in full on the password protected pages of the ontmaskering blog, for evidentiary purposes, in proving the allegations only.



S v. Johnstone: 5 x Crimen Injuria

Dear Sirs & Ladies,

Apologies for the inconvenience; but I do not intentionally distribute incorrect information. If or when I am informed with evidence that I have made an error, then my religious cultural principles of Radical Hon(our)sty , require that I take personal responsibility for my error, and correct it. This is such a case.

In aforementioned letter to you, I included a copy of the original article, from SA Sucks (www.zasucks.com): Your Life is In Danger (www.zasucks.com/?p=6151) (PDF[7]), as an enclosure/link. At the time of sharing the information with you, I fully believed, according to my efforts to confirm the information, that the information in said article was authentic and honest information shared from its authors, Doodler and Lone Wolf, of SA Sucks.


Brief Chronology of Events:

The aforementioned article including its gruesome and horrific crime scene photographs, was posted to the aforementioned SA Sucks website, by ‘Doobler’ (Article and 1 photo) and ‘Lone Wolf’ (Photo Gallery of 13 photos), on October 27th.

On Oct 30th, I contacted Lone Wolf by email, to make further enquiries regarding the crime scene photos, so as to ascertain their authenticity, and other evidence he stated he had, for submission to the International Criminal Court: Office of the Prosecutor: Information and Evidence Unit. I had submitted other – unrelated to SASucks -- South African White Refugee, and related material to the ICC; and thought the crime scene photos significant important additional evidence. His response convinced me he was genuinely concerned, and I concluded he was telling the truth about the photos: Should the ICC investigate, he would provide the ICC with the information as to his sources; and the matter could be professionally and impartially investigated.

On 04 November 2009, I was informed the ‘owner’ of the SASucks blog, ‘Uhuru Guru’ was arrested, by a Capt. van der Linde (Linden Police Station, Jhb), without any charges being filed. He was subsequently held overnight in police cells, and subsequently released the following day, when the State Prosecutor refused to lay charges, on the old crimen injuria matter, from 1993.

The initial news of the arrest shocked the blogging community, many -– like myself -- who mobilized to spread the word, about his arrest, far and wide. The arrests occurring so soon after SA Sucks crime scene photograph ‘expose’, I very strongly suspected the possibility that the arrests were directly linked, and the arrests appeared to be attempts to intimidate SA Sucks, to cease exposing ‘South African crime’ evidence which the S. A. government and police were hiding and covering up.

On 06 Nov, I was informed of a post at Litnet, (And so the Boston Stranglers victims end up on SASucks), which alleged the aforementioned South African crime scene photographs to be frauds. Unfortunately, a Google search for Boston Strangler crime scene photographs, yields the exact picture[10**] found on aforementioned original SASucks site; although the Boston Crime Scene site comments allege other crime scene realities. Irrespective of which crime scene the photo was originally from, it clearly is not as inferred and represented in the original SA Sucks article; casting serious doubt on the other photos, in the same article, as originally stated. [** See 16 Nov '09 Update.]

In compiling a transcript of the email correspondence between myself and Lone Wolf et al, on this matter, for transparency disclosure purposes; a further very strange ‘Red Flag’ occurred:
There is one email missing from my Microsoft Email Account Sent box, and I am pretty sure I sent it to Lone Wolf and [Name Withheld], sometime around Nov 3, or 4. The only other time any email has ever disappeared from my computer, that I am aware of, was an email written in May 2001, to President G.W. Bush; CC: FBI, CIA et al; requesting the suspension of Timothy McVeigh’s execution, for McVeigh and the victims of the OKC bombing to get closure, via Radical Honesty Truth and Forgiveness.

This missing email was a copy of the Molotov Cocktail, March ‘07 article: Paramilitary Training Camps in South Africa [http://whatisyourrrintelligence.blogspot.com/2009/11/paramilitary-training-camps-in-south.html], with the Cryptome PDF attachment of the alleged 2001 NIA Briefing of Pres. Thabo Mbeki, regarding alleged Hamas Paramilitary Training Camps in South Africa. I did not delete the email; and if intentionally removed by any individual, then I consider it a plausibility the removal of the email, from my computer, is yet another Plausible Deniable Crypto Message from the NSA, whom I granted permission to monitor all my written, telephonic et al communications on 28 October 2001[11].


Cryptome PDF Original at: http://cryptome.org/za-hamas.htm
Copy: https://docs.google.com/fileview?id=0B4TzWFmSUmx9ODAwZTBiMGItMTQyOC00M2ZmLWJjMmItYmE2MmJmZTM2MjBj&hl=en


Note: The Military Intelligence Agencies who were contacted (CC’d to my ICC complaint) about these Population Policy Common Sense: ‘White Refugee’ and ‘Assymetrical Resource Warfare’ matters, are listed among others, at www.miragestorum.co.nr

I accordingly include as an attachment hereto, the full Transparency Disclosure transcript of all email correspondence between myself and Lone Wolf, et al, in this matter.


Conclusion, Retraction and Apology

The arguments[12] and evidence I have submitted previously and elsewhere for the claims I have made, in regard to crime and racially motivated acts of crime in South Africa, based upon the evidence stated therein, remain. I still think the South African government are not being remotely transparent and have, and continue to, violate the Social Contract; as I have repeatedly accused them of since 2002, in various legal complaints[13] (et al). However, I do not support making accusations against anyone, based upon known false information.

I accordingly am honour bound to inform you that I herewith retract the aforementioned article provided to you. I furthermore unequivocally apologize, should the photographs have distressed you, they certainly disturbed me greatly.

Please herewith accept my unreserved apologies and retraction of aforementioned article, from the contents of my communication to you.

Respectfully Submitted,


Lara Johnstone, Pro Se Applicant
P O Box 5049, George East, 6539
Tel: (044) 870 7239

Encl. Annexure AA: Transparency Disclosure: Email Correspondence: Lara Johnstone to & from: SA Sucks: Doodler & Lone Wolf. Dates: Friday Oct 30, to Nov 5, 2009

Source: PDF:55K: Encl: PDF:2603K

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Cape Bar & Intn'l Bar Assoc: Pro Bono Comm's: RE: Freedom of Speech Political and Cultural Rights, or Secession?; Constitutional, & Intn'l Law Issues

Photos from Wake Up Whitey! (aka Population Policy Common Sense)

“Karl Marx had it wrong. Class has, been a major factor in history; but class itself is a derivative concept that is based on the ultimate causative power in history: sex. Control -- or the claim of control -- over the means of reproduction has been even more fundamental to history than has control of the means of production.”
~ Eve's Seed: Biology, the Sexes and the Course of History ~

“Unlike plagues of the dark ages or contemporary diseases which we do not yet understand, the modern plague of overpopulation is soluble by means we have discovered and with resources we possess. What is lacking is not sufficient knowledge of the solution, but universal consciousness of the gravity of the problem and the education of the billions who are it’s victims” -- Martin Luther King
~ Africa, Don't Blame the Whites | The Problem with Africa | Africa's Leaders Need a Paradigm Shift in Their Thinking ~



Letter to Cape Bar & Intn'l Bar Assoc: Pro Bono Committees

Subject: HC-WC In Forma Pauperis (Crimen Injuria) Review Application; RE: Freedom of Speech Political and Cultural Rights, or Secession?; Constitutional, Foreign and International Law Issues


* 09-11-07 Correction Update *
Letter: Notice of (i) Correction of Errors & (ii) Retraction of Enclosure; re: Encl. Your Life is In Danger (www.zasucks.com/?p=6151) (PDF:49K)
Enclosure: Annexure AA: Transparency Disclosure: Email Correspondence: Lara Johnstone to & from: SA Sucks: Doodler & Lone Wolf. Dates: Friday Oct 30, to Nov 5, 2009 (2603K)


S v. Johnstone: 5 x Crimen Injuria

Honourable Sirs/Madam,

[1] I am writing to request your Pro Bono Committee’s support, as follows:
[a] [Cape/Intn’l] To peruse the brief overview of legal arguments of fact and law; upon which I wish to found my Application for Leave, and Judicial Review;

[b] [Cape] Assist Mr. Stage, Registrar of the High Court, should he wish to contact you, in suggesting a suitably practicing Attorney or Attorney’s firm, in Capetown (or as relevant), whom the High Court, can accordingly refer my In Forma Pauperis application to, in terms of the provisions of Sub-Rule 1(a) of Rule 40 of the Rules of the High Court;

[c] [Cape/Intn’l] Please forward this correspondence to any Attorney, Attorney’s firm, or as appropriate, whom your Pro Bono committee consider may be interested or suitably qualified to provide me with Pro Bono Legal Assistance, in the capacity of either: (i) representation of counsel, or (ii) assistance of counsel; or (iii) a legal expert in the particular relevant fields of issue.


[2] Brief Summary of Grounds for Leave and Review:
[a] Absence of Jurisdiction: Crimen Injuria is Unconstitutional; State’s Irretrievable Breach of Truth and Reconciliation Social Contract Principles, and Denial of International Political, Civil & Cultural Rights provides legal grounds for Secession.
  • The law of Crimen Injuria is unconstitutional, in that, it violates the fundamental principle which is the foundation of a ‘democracy’; namely the principle of freedom of speech. In a constitutional republic, there is no such right as the ‘right not to be offended/insulted’.[23]

  • Denial of International Constitutional Right to a Jury Trial: The denial to South African citizens of access to a Jury Trial, to be judged by a jury of their peers, is unconstitutional, and a violation of the principles of International Political, Civil and Cultural Rights. Furthermore, a democracy is dangerous because it is a one-vote system as opposed to a Republic, which is a three-vote system. Three votes to check tyranny, not just one. Citizens have not been informed of their other two jury votes.

  • Due Process Irregularity: Denial of Freedom of Religion, Belief, Opinion and Expression, Language, and Linguistic Culture, Admissible and Competent Evidence: » Secession and Self Determination:

    • Law of Crimen Injuria conflicts with Applicants Radical Hon(our)sty Religion, since the law of Crimen Injuria requires the Applicant to lie, pretend and be a two-faced hypocrite; whenever it may be possible, that someone either with a sensitive ego, or a vengeance minded axe to grind, may choose to pretend to feel offended or insulted, by Applicants honest opinion, shared non-violently, in person to their face (not behind their back): verbally, or in writing[24]; by filing crimen injuria charges, and abusing taxpayers money on criminal prosecutions to massage their ego’s.

    • Furthermore, if the constitutionality of Crimen Injuria is upheld, at the expense of Applicants Radical Hon(our)sty Cultural Religion, as founded upon (i) Radical Honesty Social Contract[25] and (ii) The Laws of Sustainability[26]; and those on behalf of whom she conducted her original civil disobedience act[27]; then such denial amounts to the final and irretrievable breach and nullification of the Truth and Reconciliation Social Contract[28]; providing for the Applicants international legal standing, for grounds for Secession and Self Determination, in accordance with the principles enunciated in Security Council Resolution of 1244, the “recognition of a human community within a sovereign state enjoying a right to self-determination.” (Radical Hon(our)sty Social Contract Offer: Revolution of “Being Black/ Being White” Consciousness; OR Minutemen Secession?[29])

[b] Gross Irregularities in the Proceedings & The Admission of the State’s Inadmissible or Incompetent Evidence, and the Rejection of Pro Se Defendant’s Admissible and Competent Evidence
  • Courts Rejection of Applicants Pro Se Admissible and Competent Application: Notice of Intention: Correct the Record: Withdrawal of Formal Admissions (PDF[30]; Proof of Service PDF[31])

  • Courts Rejection of Applicants Pro Se Admissible and Competent Application: Notice of Intention: Application for Leave, and Judicial Review (PDF[32], Proof of Service PDF[33]), filed subsequent to conviction, with supporting Affidavits, by two expert witnesses, supporting the Founding Affidavit (PDF[34]):

    • Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D, evidencing the legal, psychological, and socio-political ‘citizens privilege’, Nuremberg Principles skills and competencies of Individual Responsibility, required for acts of civil disobedience to perceived illegitimate authority; and their application to the common law ‘reasonableness test’ (PDF[35])

    • Affidavit of Leonard George Horowitz evidencing the Origin of AIDS sourcing from Hepatitus B Vaccine experiments conducted by Agents and Agencies of the Federal Government of the United States of America and the Merck Pharmaceutical Company (PDF[36])


  • Courts Rejection of Applicants Pro Se Admissible and Competent Application Prior to Conviction: Legal Argument: Political Necessity, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF37]; Proof of Service PDF)

  • Courts Indifferent and Repeated Rejection of all Applicants Pro Se Applications, with the requirement that the content thereof is unworthy of serious impartial consideration, unless the legal format and application process procedures of its submittal meets the exact same legal standards as those required of qualified legal representatives, demonstrates the courts choice to act as a Critical Legal Literacy Interpreter Parasite instead of a Legal Social Engineer[39]; not to mention a confirmation of the facts, to which the court and State repeatedly demonstrated their indifference; as –- for example -- stated Applicants Application for Leave, and Judicial Review, dated 22 September 2009 [Pt 10] (PDF[40], Proof of Service PDF[41])
    South African Law Commission Issue Paper Six, alleged the Criminal Justice System to have a severe Legitimacy and Inefficiency Crisis, in that:
    • Communities are intimidated by the legal system, and ignorant of how it works.
    • Legal representation is inadequate and discriminatory.
    • Legal aid has not been able to serve its intended purpose.
    • The justice system's inaccessibility means it is perceived as illegitimate, ineffective, unfriendly, resulting in alternative dispute resolution whether legal or illegal.
    • Unnecessary complexities brought into access to justice and the mystifying language used.

  • Due Process Irregularity: Denial of Nuremberg Principles Skills and Competencies in interpretation and application of common law ‘reasonableness test’ [Application and Interpretation of the Bill of Rights, in terms of the Common Law, International Law and Foreign Law; & spirit, purport and object of Bill of Rights]

    • Courts Incorrect Interpretation of the Unreasonableness Test, and application thereof to Crimen Injuria: The correct test the court should have applied, was not the ‘man on the Clapham omnibus test’, but the test of the ordinary skilled political activist exercising or professing to have the special skills, in non-violently, by means of civil disobedience Nuremberg and ‘citizens privilege’ principles, confronting – perceived to be -- illegal political authority[42].(Affidavit: Brad Blanton PDF[43])

  • Due Process Irregularity: Denial of Access to Information and Just Administrative Action Principles, and Admissible and Competent Evidence.

    • Plaintiff’s Use of Crimen Injuria Charges were not honourable: Plaintiffs Intentions: Political Persecution of Applicant; by means of Perjury, and Fraud.

    • State’s Prosecution of Crimen Injuria Charges were not honourable: Irregular and Illegal Actions of Complicity to Plaintiff’s Perjury, Fraud and Political Persecution of Applicant.

  • Courts Refusal to allow Applicant the opportunity to invoke the Political Necessity Defence [Civil Disobedience and the Necessity Defence, John Alan Cohen, Pierce Law Review (PDF[44])]; renders Applicants Formal Admissions -- made, as required by, the Political Necessity Defence – null and void

    • Court made irregular use of Applicants Null and Void Formal Admissions, as factual evidence to its findings of Guilt of the Applicant.

    • Courts Refusal to accept Applicants Formal Admission Facts, as sufficient proof of such facts; renders (i) Applicants Formal Admissions as null and void; (ii) shows that 84% of the politicians who received the ‘crimen injuria’ text messages, considered them to be lawful, because they did not file any charges of crimen injuria; accordingly the crimen injuria text messages do not pass the crimen injuria ‘reasonableness test’, when only one out of six text message recipients, allegedly considered them to be an ‘insult to their dignity’; the exact same recipient who committed perjury in her affidavit and on the witness stand. (SAPS: Complaint of Perjury, Fraud & Persecution against Hon. Patricia de Lille PDF[45])

    • Courts Refusal to Honour Applicants Notice to Correct the Record: Withdrawal of Formal Admissions, in accordance with Criminal Procedure Act § 105A Plea and Sentence Agreement principles.


[3]Crimen Injuria, Freedom of Speech (Secrecy/Transparency), Human Rights, SA Constitution, International Human Rights, Secession, Justification Defenses & Jury Nullification Legal Experts.

Furthermore, I have also CC’d the following, Legal Experts on these issues, who may, or may not, be willing to consider providing a bit of Pro Bono assistance, in regards to their particular areas of expertise, if so requested:
  • Prof. Jonathan Burchell[46], Professor of Law, UCT. Professor Burchell is not only a legal expert on Criminal Law and Procedure; but also on Crimen Injuria; as the co-author of Personality Rights and Freedom of Expression: The Modern Actio Injuriarum (1998) Juta & Co. Ltd;

    Crimen Injuria Legal Authorities, among others:

    • In Primary Legal Code Word: Crimen Injuria, and Decoding Crimen Injuria & Racially Offensive Language: Legal Case Law et al, under Propositions of Law with Reference to Authorities, and Application of Facts to Propositions of Law, as found in State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF[47]; Proof of Service PDF[48])

  • Prof. Richard Calland[49], Assoc. Prof of Law: Constitutional, Human Rights & Administrative Law, specialising in the law and practice of the right to access to information and whistleblowing protection; in administrative justice, public ethics and constitutional design. He is a member of the Transparency Task team of the Institute for Public Dialogue at Columbia University, which is led by Professor Joseph Stiglitz.

    Transparency Quotes and Argument, among others:

    • S v Hoho (493/05) [2008] ZASCA 98; [2009] 1 All SA 103 (SCA) ; 2009 (1) SACR 276 (SCA) (17 September 2008), as per: Decoding Crimen Injuria & Racially Offensive Language: Legal Case Law et al, under Propositions of Law with Reference to Authorities, and Application of Facts to Propositions of Law found in State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF[50]; Proof of Service[51])
    • Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone (PDF[52]; Proof of Service[53])
    • Supporting Affidavit of Dr. Len G. Horowitz (PDF[54]: Proof of Service[55])
    • Supporting Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D (PDF[56]: Proof of Service[57])
    • Complaint to SAHRC (WC-2009-0455BS): Crimes Against Peace, Crimes Against Humanity & Crime of Apartheid (PDF[58]; Service[59])

  • Prof. Thomas Bennet[60], Prof. Customary & Public International Law, UCT, expert on customary law and human rights; teaches principles governing foreign judgements in South African private international law; principles of public international law; and international law on disputes.

    Customary Law: Radical Hon(our)sty Cultural Religion, among others:

    • Justification Defence: Political Necessity: (I) Freedom of Speech: Radical Hon(our)sty Cultural Religious Practice; (II) Disobedience to Legalisation of Evil/Nullification of TRC-RSA Social Contract, as found in Brief Statement of Defendant: Justification Defence: Political Necessity: (PDF[61]; Court Proceedings, 08 July 2009; et al: Proof of Service[62])
    • Propositions of Law with Reference to Authorities, and Application of Facts to Propositions of Law found in State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF[63]; Proof of Service[64])
    • Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone (PDF[65]; Proof of Service[66])
    • Supporting Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D (PDF[67]: Proof of Service[68])
    • Complaint to SAHRC (WC-2009-0455BS): Crimes Against Peace, Crimes Against Humanity & Crime of Apartheid (PDF[69]; Service[70])

  • Prof. Pierre de Vos[71] is the Claude Leon Foundation Chair in Constitutional Governance and teaches in the area of Constitutional Law, at UCT. He is also the chairperson of the Board of the Aids Legal Network.

    Human Rights & International Law Quotes (Too many to refer to all)

    • Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone (PDF[72]; Proof of Service[73])
    • Supporting Affidavit of Dr. Len G. Horowitz (PDF[74]: Proof of Service[75])
    • Supporting Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D (PDF[76]: Proof of Service[77])
    • Complaint to SAHRC (WC-2009-0455BS): Crimes Against Peace, Crimes Against Humanity & Crime of Apartheid (PDF[78]; Service[79])

  • Prof. Wouter de Vos[80], teaches law of evidence and criminal procedure. He is a member of the Council of the International Association of Procedural Law and a member of the International Civil Litigation Committee of the International Law Association.

  • Professor Francis A. Boyle[81], Professor of Law: International Law & Human Rights, at Univ. of Chicago. He is the author of Protesting Power: War, Resistance and Law (Rowman & Littlefield Inc. 2007) which has been used successfully in anti-war protest trials. In the September 2000 issue of the prestigious The International History Review, Professor Boyle's Foundations of World Order: The Legalist Approach to International Relations (1898-1922) was proclaimed as “a major contribution to this reinterrogation of the past” and “required reading for historians, political scientists, international relations specialists, and policy-makers.”

    Human Rights & International Law Quotes (Too many to refer to all)

    • Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone (PDF[82]; Proof of Service[83])
    • Supporting Affidavit of Dr. Len G. Horowitz (PDF[84]: Proof of Service[85])
    • Supporting Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D PDF[86]: Proof of Service[87])
    • Complaint to SAHRC (WC-2009-0455BS): Crimes Against Peace, Crimes Against Humanity & Crime of Apartheid (PDF[88]; Service[89])

  • Prof. Christian Tomuschat[90], Emeritus Professor of Public International Law and European Law at Humboldt University in Berlin; former member of the UN Human Rights Committee and the UN’s International Law Commission. He is the author of Secession and Self-Determination, in Marcelo G. Kohen, Secession: International Law Perspectives, Cambridge 2006; wherein he comments on among others, how Security Council Resolution of 1244, “displaying recognition of a human community within a sovereign state enjoying a right to self-determination” (p34).

    Secession Quotes, among others:

    • “Radical Hon(our)sty Social Contract Offer[91]: Revolution of “Being Black/ Being White” Consciousness; OR Minutemen Secession?”, at Pt.60, stated as the Heading for the Conclusion, in Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone, in Support of Application for Leave, and Judicial Review (PDF[92]; Proof of Service[93])

  • Prof David Skover[94], Frederic C. Tausend Professor of Law, at University of Seattle Law School; the author of among others, The Tactics of Legal Reasoning, and The death of Discourse, and The Trials of Lenny Bruce. In 2003, Skover and his coauthor, Ron Collins, successfully petitioned Governor Pataki of New York State to posthumously pardon Lenny Bruce. In 2004, they received the Hugh Hefner First Amendment Award for The Trials of Lenny Bruce and their pardon effort.

    Prof. Kover quoted:

    • Law: Critical Literacy Interpretation of Legal Code Words: under Propositions of Law with Reference to Authorities in State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF[95]; Proof of Service[96])

    Lenny Bruce Quotes:


  • Prof. James Joseph Duane[102], Assoc. Professor at Regents Law School, Virginia Beach, VA: Author of among others: Jurors Handbook: A Citizens Guide to Jury Duty, which includes: Jury Nullification: The Top Secret Constitutional Right[103].

    Jury Nullification Quotes:

    • Decoding: Legal Justification: Jury Nullification; under Propositions of Law with Reference to Authorities, and Application of Facts to Propositions of Law, as found in State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF[104; Proof of Service[105])
    • Jurors Handbook, submitted as Evidentiary document to Application for Leave, and Judicial Review, dated 22 September 2009 (PDF[106], Proof of Service PDF[107])

  • Dr. Robert Schopp[108] is Professor of Law and Psychology at Univ. of Nebraska, and the author of Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Law: Justification Defenses and Just Convictions[109]. This major study advances an interpretation of criminal justification defenses (including necessity and nullification) that views them as an integral component of the structure of criminal law. It integrates philosophical analysis with a consideration of contemporary applications, & shows how these defenses are key components of criminal law, in the relationship between legal & moral justification.

    Justification Defence: Political Necessity, references, among others:

    • Justification Defence: Political Necessity: (I) Freedom of Speech: Radical Hon(our)sty Cultural Religious Practice; (II) Disobedience to Legalisation of Evil/Nullification of TRC-RSA Social Contract, as found in Brief Statement of Defendant: Justification Defence: Political Necessity: (PDF[110]; Court Proceedings, 08 July 2009; et al: Proof of Service[111])
    • Propositions of Law with Reference to Authorities, and Application of Facts to Propositions of Law found in State v. Johnstone: Legal Argument, dated 11 August 2009 (PDF[112]; Proof of Service[113])
    • Founding Affidavit of Lara Johnstone (PDF[114]; Proof of Service[115])
    • Supporting Affidavit of Brad Blanton, Ph.D (PDF[116]: Proof of Service[117])
    • Complaint to SAHRC (WC-2009-0455BS): Crimes Against Peace, Crimes Against Humanity & Crime of Apartheid (PDF[118]; Service[119])


  • Attorney Lowell (Larry) Becraft, Jr.[120], is a constitutional attorney based in Huntsville, Alabama, who specializes in criminal defense cases, primarily defending federal income tax protestors. Attorney Becraft is the attorney for Dr. Leonard Horowitz, whose Affidavit as an expert witness is filed in this matter, as a Written Statement of Consent in terms of § 213 of the Criminal Procedure Act: Affidavit of Leonard George Horowitz evidencing the Origin of AIDS sourcing from Hepatitus B Vaccine experiments conducted by Agents and Agencies of the Federal Government of the United States of America and the Merck Pharmaceutical Company. (PDF[121]: Proof of Service[122]; Proof of Service to SAHRC[123])

  • Attorney Katya Komisaruk[124] Just Law Collective[125], Oakland, CA. Attorney Komisaruk is an ‘anarchist lawyer’, who specialises in defending and advising protestors engaged in civil disobedience tactics. She perhaps best known for her successful defense of hundreds of demonstrators arrested during the 1999 World Trade Organisation meeting in Seattle. She is a Harvard educated lawyer, who can speak with authority on the repercussions of civil disobedience, from personal experience of two years she spent in prison for vandalizing nuclear weapons navigational equipment at Vandenburg Air Force Base in 1987.

  • Jon Roland[126], Founder & President of the Constitution Society. He is the 2002 and 2006 Nominee of the Texas Libertarian Party for Texas Attorney General; and currently exploring a ‘Ron Paul Libertarian like’ candidacy for the U.S. Senate in Texas. He has done a great deal of work in the field of constitutional history. Speaker at We The People Congress conference in Alexandria VA, 2007: Common Constitutional Errors. Accepted by a court in Williamson County, Texas in 2005, as an expert witness on constitutional and legal history. Seeks to revive the constitutional militia system envisioned by the Founders, involving the organizing and training of the entire population to defend their communities against threats, including threats from terrorism, foreign invasion, insurrection, crime, and disasters, and to secure national borders against unlawful entry. Discussed in Jonathan Karl, The Right to Bear Arms: The Rise of America's New Militias, HarperCollins, New York (1995).


Dated at George, Southern Cape, South Africa, on this day, the 28th of October, 2009

Lara Johnstone, Pro Se Applicant
Per: P O Box 5049, George East, 6539
Tel: (044) 870 7239


» » » » [PDF Archive: In Forma Pauperis Correspondence]